*RESPONDING TO SANHAS LATEST STATEMENT*
BY ASK GORA MOTA-ENDORSED BY QALAMUL HAQ
SANHA, after realizing that the public have smelt a rat, have attempted to save some face by releasing a statement which attempts to answer the objections made.
The points made by SANHA in a nutshell are
*SANHA is not money orientated as they defended Cadbury even though they had no contract with them in the past
*Claimed that the basis of the dramatic statement was only due to the wine connotations and they didn’t state it as Haraam all they said was exercise caution.
*Didn’t wish to breach Amaana and feared legal implications therefore kept vital information away from the public
The claim of SANHA of being altruistic and being unconcerned regarding monetary gain is laughable, they might as well carry out their duties as a charity work, they would ofcourse give us stories of how nothing in life is free and everything has costs which cannot be covered when being done in this sense,however we are all certain that the cash benefits are well over and above cost.
Defending Cadbury without a contract doesn’t necessitate selfless service, defending an entity could be done with the hope of luring them to become clients. We can only imagine the despair when a fellow halaal body shatters one’s dreams.
We are not understanding the stance of SANHA in the light of Shariah, the Shariah allows the usage of vinegar that is made from wine despite it being derived from a wine source, are SANHA becoming more pious then the Shariah itself?What exactly is there view regarding tabdeel E maahiyat ie metemorphisis in this context?
This breach of Amaana story is laughable, is the” Amaanat”of a non Muslim company more important then the Amaanah of the entire Muslim community of South Africa?
The Shariah concept of Amaanah is being misapplied, to expose a matter of concern to the public is not contrary to Amaanah.
The legal excuse is baseless, one has a moral obligation to bring these matters out in the public sphere, this was done before by SANHA. There are no legal repercussions for doing such. It is surprising that SANHAs legal concerns had been abated the moment NIHT became the halaal authority that certifies Cadbury.
In essence it would be better if SANHA remains silent, we dont like taking out time to expose fallacies, but when a statement with such hogwash is released we feel constrained to respond.
UK GOVERNMENT TAKEN TO COURT – DISEASED CARRION
SANHA’S & MJC’S HARAAM FILTHY, DISEASED CARRION
UK GOVERNMENT TAKEN TO COURT
UK in court over ‘genetic monsters’ with claim ‘Frankenchickens’ grown to staggering size
AN ANIMAL welfare charity is taking the Government to court to end the farming of what they call “Frankenchickens” – birds they claim have been bred selectively for phenomenal growth but that suffer numerous health conditions as a result.
By IAN RANDALL
08:03, Wed, Mar 16, 2022 | UPDATED: 08:23, Wed, Mar 16, 2022
The Humane League UK senior public affairs lead Amro Hussain said: “For decades the animal industry has selectively bred chickens to grow faster and faster — these animals grow 400 percent faster than they did in the 1950s.”
“Today they reach slaughter weight at only five weeks old — they’re just babies.
“The results are huge, often immobile birds, who struggle to walk, get burned by their own waste, suffer heart-attacks, and whose flesh is streaked with fat.
“We call them ‘Frankenchickens’ because we have created a genetic monster — animals who live lives of inescapable misery.”
Alongside causing the birds’ short lives to be beset with pain, The Humane League claim that the health complications inherent to “Frankenchickens” can also interfere with the meat they yield.
Marks called “hock burns” are said to be left when the ammonia found in chicken excrement burns through the skin on the bird’s leg, these blemishes are known to put off customers, and so many meat producers now take steps to remove them prior to sale.
According to a 2005 study in the journal British Poultry Science, 82 percent of chickens sold in British supermarkets had identifiable signs of hock burn.
Meanwhile, a condition known as “green muscle disease” — which, as the name suggests, turns flesh a yellowish-green colour — can be caused when the birds flap their wings excessively despite having not had the exercise needed to first build up their circulatory supply in their breast muscles.
The resulting swelling starts off reddish-brown but rapidly fades to a putrid green. Despite the colour, however, the condition does not spoil the meat’s flavour or make it unsafe to eat.
Under the Welfare of Farmed Animals Regulations 2007, animals may only legally be kept for farming purposes “if it can reasonably be expected, on the basis of their genotype or phenotype, that they can be kept without any detrimental effect on their health or welfare”.
Advocates for Animals’ solicitor Edie Bowles, who is representing The Humane League in their case, claimed: “The science shows that fast-growing chickens slaughtered for meat cannot be kept without such detriment.”
Fast-growing chickens, she said, are those that have been bred to reach slaughter weight in around 35 days — or around five weeks.
Ms Bowles added: “It is our position that keeping these birds is unlawful.”
However, she claimed: “The Department of Food Environment and Rural Affairs [Defra] is allowing this to continue.”
Part of the problem, Ms Bowles claimed, is that “there is not an adequate system in place to detect and respond to these breaches of law”.
“We hope a ruling will force Defra to take responsibility and stop allowing these birds to suffer.”
She added: “It is also our client’s position that the system in place creates an unfair competitive advantage in favour of those who produce fast growing chickens.
“The system is unable to detect those producers who break the law meaning they are able to place cheaper birds on the market than their competitors who comply with the law.”
The Humane League has claimed that improving the welfare of broiler chickens will result in both better meat for the public and greater profits for farmers.
In support of this, they point to their “Better Chicken Commitment” — a science-based welfare policy that aims to eliminate some of the worse problems involved in factory farming.
Since its launch in 2018, the league said, more than 140 companies have signed up, including KFC, Marks & Spencer and Waitrose.
The first step in The Humane League’s request for a judicial review will be an initial permission hearing at the High Court, which is scheduled to be held on March 22, 2022.
If the league’s argument proves successful, the review will move to a full hearing.
15 Sha’baan 1443 – 18 March 2022
SANHA’S FLEECING FEES ARE OPPRESSIVE EXTORTION
SANHA denies the charge of extortion and charging exorbitant fees for the services it renders. Vindicating itself against the charge, SANHA says: “For information purposes SANHA fees are commensurate to the work required in maintaining the Halaal programme. Therefore the amount on the contracts willingly entered into will vary. SANHA’s average current certification fees in the categories stated are:
|Butcheries||R550.00 per month|
|Take Away/Restaurants||R500.00 per month|
|Beef Abattoir||R 5.00 per carcass|
|Sheep Abattoir||R 2.00 per carcass|
|Poultry Abattoir||from R1 500 per month|
|Retail Bakery||R500.00 per month|
Is there truth in SANHA’s claims? Please comment.
The aforementioned charges are a part of the carrion scheme of fees. SANHA has perpetrated deception in mentioning only a portion of the fees. SANHA is also silent on the massively exorbitant fees it charges Rainbow Chickens. In its carrion fleece-fee chart, is mentioned: “Poultry Abattoir from R1,500 per month”. SANHA dare not mention the limit – from R1500 to what? Besides the several types of haram gangster type taxation, SANHA should inform of the actual amount of carrion tax it extracts from Rainbow Chickens.
Further, SANHA should not attempt to deceive people by saying “R5 per carcass and R2 per carcass”. SANHA should declare the total sum of the protection tax it acquired from these two ‘carcass’ fees. There is no basis in the Shariah to charge even 10 cents per carcass. SANHA does no slaughter the animals. It does not contribute physically to the slaughtering or to any other aspect related to the slaughtering, skinning, packing, etc., etc. These “per carcass” fees are haraam, having absolutely no basis in the Shariah.
It should also be understood that the ‘services’ rendered by SANHA are of its own volition and are imposed in a haraam manner on traders and animal-killing plants. It is haraam to charge fees for unsolicited ‘services’. The fees of SANHA in terms of the Shariah are extortion and haraam.
We have explained the evil system of SANHA’s extortion in a booklet several years ago. The title is: SANHA’S HARAAM FLEECING FEES. The booklet is available on our website. Hard copies are also available.
The following is an extract from the booklet to show the falsehood peddled by the Carrion Purveyor.
…………. We are confronted here with compound extortion – and much of it is ambiguous since the amounts to be extorted will be calculated in future when the mock inspection transpires. (v) The story of the mock inspection and fleecing fees has still not ended. In addition to the aforementioned ‘inspections’, there is another inspection about which the agreement states: “Inspections will be carried out at SANHA’s discretion at least once per calendar month.” The expenses of this inspection is also borne by Rainbow. Since large amounts of money are extorted for each inspection separately, what is the monthly licence fee for? And, what are the carcass fees for? (vi) The Fleecing Fees extortion racket also provides for the company to pay SANHA’s supervisors separately. Although the supervisors are executing services for SANHA, the carrion company pays the salaries of the supervisors.
Now that Rainbow pays separately for SANHA’s inspections, supervision and administration, what are the confounded monthly licence fees for? And what are the carcass fee for? Answering this question, the fatwa states: “The fee which is charged for inspections and supervisions is in actual fact in lieu of the fuel used by them for inspecting the outlet.” Someone must have been perpetrating some type of substance abuse when making this stupid statement. Or the mind is befogged as a consequence of devouring SANHA’s carrion chickens. Does SANHA use R50,000 every month for fuel to inspect one carrion plant twice or thrice a month? This is the approximate amount which SANHA charges for licence fleecing fee and inspection fleecing fee every month.
Furthermore, the fatwa fails to distinguish between ‘inspection’ and ‘supervision’. While the inspectors come to the carrion plant twice a month using about R100 fuel per time, the supervisors are paid a full wage separately by Rainbow. What are the R50,000 monthly confounded fees all about? It is all about extortion and fleecing the company. The fatwa then draws a plainly stupid and baseless analogy between the carrion fleecing fees and the fee a hunter pays to hunt in a game farm. Says the fatwa:
“We can regard this (SANHA’s carrion) transaction taking place between the hunter and the game farm owner as an Ijarah (lease) transaction. In other words, the hunter is paying a fee for utilizing the facilities provided to him by the owner such as using their roads etc. The animal that will be hunted in this case will be a gift from the owner.” In this false analogy, who is the ‘hunter’ and who is the ‘game farm owner’ in relation to SANHA’s haraam agreement with Rainbow? In the game farm scenario, the hunter coughs up the money, hence in the light of the corrupt analogy, Rainbow is the ‘hunter’, and SANHA is the ‘game farm owner’. However, the ‘gift’ element is lacking in the carrion transaction. SANHA presents no gift or bonus to Rainbow in lieu of the huge sums of money it extorts from the company.
Whilst the example of the hunter and the game farm also requires some rebuttal, for the sake of brevity we shall not deal with it in this discussion. The hunter pays the owner of the farm, a simple, flat one-off fee for the utilization of his facilities. But the ‘hunter’ (Rainbow) in the chicken carrion scenario is loaded with a variety of elements of extortion. Rainbow does not pay for any services rendered to it. Rainbow pays exorbitant sums of money for a range of phantom ‘services’. Inspecting the plant by a carrion purveyor is not a ‘service’ ordered by Rainbow. It is a condition imposed by SANHA for issuing its carrion certificate. All the other hallucinated ‘services’ which we have already discussed and refuted, are not services ordered by the Carrion Company. They are conditions which SANHA imposes on Rainbow to dupe the Muslim community – to make us believe that the carrion is halaal.
SANHA publicizes itself as a non-profit ‘deeni’ organization rendering service to the Muslim community. If the community accepts that SANHA is indeed rendering it a service, then it is the duty of Muslims to bear the expenses of the inspections, supervision, etc., and this will be light years away from the tip of the iceberg, i.e. the R50,000 monthly licence and corruption fees. Far from this miserable carrion outfit being a ‘non-profitable’ and a ‘deeni’ body, it is Islamically corrupt. Its greed for haraam boodle is insatiable. It extorts millions of rands for haraam and luxury expenditure. It misappropriates the Deen and the Halaal logo for monetary objectives, then it flaunts the naked audacity of claiming to be a ‘non-profitable deeni’ organization.
Furthermore, it is incumbent to proffer some advice to the honourable Mufti Sahib who has endorsed the corrupt ‘fatwa’ of his student. The honourable Mufti Sahib should understand that operating a Darul Ifta with student ‘muftis’ under his wing is a sacred responsibility. The students training under him are an Amaanat. It is absolutely imperative for the honourable Mufti Sahib to abandon whatever other activity he may be involved in to enable him to contribute 100% of his time and mind to the shenanigan ‘fatwas’ which his incapable students are fabricating. The ‘fatwa’ which we have just now discussed is not a Fatwa. The student has simply put together a very unprofessional essay, and it appears that the honourable Mufti Sahib had lackadaisically scanned over it and endorsed it without applying his mind. The ‘fatwa’ is scandalous and portrays the incompetency of the student who has compiled it. It will be salubrious for the honourable Mufti Sahib and his Ifta students to re-study Rasmul Mufti, etc. with minds and hearts fully applied. If the honourable Mufti Sahib acquits himself with laxity regarding the fulfilment of his obligation of correctly nurturing his students, both academically and morally, then we can assure him that they – his students – will become haatibul lail characters labouring in the self-deception of them being expert muftis when in reality they will be one-eyed juhala misleading others and themselves.
It is ludicrous to equate the range of complex fleecing fees extorted by SANHA with a simple, reasonable monthly fee to cover necessary expenditure which any how should not be an expense for Rainbow. It should be an expense for the Muslim community IF it is established that the carrion clique is able to distinguish between haraam and halaal.
We trust that the honourable Mufti Sahib will set his Darul Ifta in order and drill real academic ability in his students, and this is not possible without inculcating Taqwa in them. (End of extract)
The aforementioned naseehat is from our booklet published several years ago. We can now safely say that the mufti implicated in this carrion scandal is a mudhil who has betrayed Allah Ta’ala, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), Islam and the Muslim community with his rubbish zigzag fatwas.
There are two evils attendant to the Fleece Fees which SANHA and other Carrion Halaalizers impose on traders:
(1) Extortion (2) Exorbitant charges.
The fees are in terms of the Shariah Extortion. It is the unjustified imposition and extraction of money in a bloodthirsty, parasitic manner from traders who mistakenly have been led to believe that their business will suffer if they do not cough up the haraam tax imposed on them by SANHA, MJC and the other members of the satanic cartel of carrion halaalizers.
Fees charged by these Carrion shayaateen are just like protection tax charged by gangsters. Carrion fees are a glorified form of gangster ‘protection tax’. There is no Islamic validity for this haraam extortion which is pure zulm. The ‘service’ provided by SANHA & Carrion Co. is a hallucinated, baseless, unsolicited, hated ‘inspection’ required by the smokescreen dubbed ‘supervision’. In reality there is no supervision. Supervision is another fake designed to mislead, deceive and bamboozle ignoramuses. Our booklet on hallucinated supervision is also available on our website.
Regardless of the fee amount, even if just R1, according to the Shariah it is haraam extortion. There is no concept in the Shariah into which this haraam, gangster tax could be fitted into. The charge per carcass is abhorrent and pure extortion of a vile kind. The silly chart of charges presented buy SANHA for public consumption is a poor red herring which does not secure SANHA’s objective of convincing anyone of the alleged justification for levying such haraam gangster protection tax on traders who fear for their business suffering adversely by the maliciously designed comments of SANHA regarding such traders who refuse to apply for a carrion certificate.
The one and only objective of the halaal certification racket is to line the pockets of the carrion cartel gangsters. It is a satanic profession devoid of even a vestige of Islamic altruism.
Furthermore, the haraam carrion tax is literally exorbitant. It is an extravasation – sucking parasitically – money from traders to enable the members of the carrion cartel to live in opulence. But they should not bask in the comforts and luxuries the ill-gotten taxes allow them, for Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“The Fire has a greater claim over a body nourished with haraam.”
11 Shawwaal 1442 – 24 May 2021
SANHA CONCEDES ITS OWN LACK OF SUPERVISION
SANHA CONCEDES ITS OWN LACK OF SUPERVISION
A Brother writes:
After the recent SANHA ham flavoring saga some concerned brother raised some questions. I prompted the brothers to contact SANHA themselves for clarity on the question which infact is very interesting.
They wanted to know if SANHA approves a product do they only inspect the factory where the final product is made or do they also inspect the factories/ laboratories where other ingredients are manufactured. i.e other ingredients present in the final product
For example SANHA approves Lays chips. But lays do not manufacture every ingredient in the Lays chips themselves. Additives such as flavoring, colorants, MSG, etc are all sourced from suppliers. The question is, does SANHA know what is going on in the factories/Labs of the suppliers of each and every ingredient present in the Lays chips. Is there a chance of contamination, what else is being produced in these factories/Labs, what extraction methods are being used to manufacture these additives, is there ethanol present in the extraction process, etc etc. At times there are up to 20 different ingredients in a single packet of chips. Does SANHA visit the suppliers of all these ingredients.
The answer to all of this was honestly answered by SANHA themselves in one simple question
CALLER: ……. So if Lays source their colorants and flavorings from another factory do you guys go to that factory where they getting their ingredients for inspection aswell
ANSWER GIVEN: There is a check in but obviously it would not be at the same level because ummm, Im just giving you hypothetically, if Lays has a SANHA agreement with us then we would check their stuff but we wouldn’t now just say everyone… for example if the product is halaal certified we would not just be able to get into everyone’s factory unless they have an agreement with SANHA also. But the ingredients is checked properly
It is amazing to see that SANHA so confident to put their stamps on products that have ingredients that they themselves haven’t seen being manufactured, who knows what goes on in the hundred’s of suppliers factories and Labs. A simple internet search will prove that many food additives go through heavy chemical processes involving various types of alcohols and animal derivatives. And even if an ingredient is known not to have alcohol or animal derivatives who can guarantee no contamination in factories without physically visiting these factories.
Jazakallah for always standing up and warning us. Hadhrat has for years warned us about these type of issues but people find it very difficult to believe.
May Allah Ta’ala allow us to continue taking maximum benefit from Hadhrat
The brother who made the call wishes to remain anonymous
(End of letter)
Supervision by SANHA and all other shaitaani carrion halaalizers, is a massive lie, falsehood and hoax to deceive the stupid masses who have become addicted to devour carrion like vultures.
We have explained in several articles that it is humanly impossible to supervise the billions of kuffaar factories and other links in the chain of production. The innumerable ingredients are camouflaged with hieroglyphics, chemical names, many unpronounceable, and with deceptive e-numbers, many representing swine derivatives. All of this is acceptable to SANHA and the cartel of carrion halaalizers.
In the answer which the SANHA shaitaan gave to the Brother, is a clear admission of SANHA’s unawareness of the ingredients which it halaalizes. The whole filthy devilish mess centres around only haraam boodle. Boodle is the only objective for the shaitaani profession of halaalizing carrion.
17 Muharram 1441 – 17 September 2019
SANHA THE EXPERT PORK HALAALIZER
SANHA THE EXPERT PORK HALAALIZER
Please find attached picture of chips and explanation given by SANHA for the permissibility of the HAM flavour in the chips. Are these HAM-flavoured chips halaal?
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Seek a fatwa from your heart.” If the Muslim’s heart has not been darkened and convoluted with the addiction of haraam carrion, pork and the like of satanic food, then the fatwa which will emanate from a healthy Imaan will be adequate for guidance regardless of any corrupt, zig zag fatwa any mufti issues to halaalize the HAM favour or any other haraam ingredient of which there is a deluge in all commercial products halaalized by the haraam, shaitaani carrion-certifying outfits such as SANHA, MJC, NIHT, etc.
SANHA’s explanation of ‘synthetic’ pork, bacon and ham will soothe the Devil and his progeny. It does not satisfy those whose Imaan is intact and untarnished by carrion consumption. The questioner says:
“According to SANHA this was not fraudulent usage of their logo as the product uses synthetic ham flavouring and is produced in a SANHA certified plant.”
The whole certifying mess is a massive FRAUD akin to kufr. While this jaahil, zindeeq SANHA group of carrion halaalizers does “not
permit the logo to be appended on any product which has connotation with Haraam such as ham, bacon, etc.’, the pork substance is produced in a SANHA-certified plant. What happens in these certified plants is the action of Iblees. The claim of supervision by any of these carrion juhala is a massive LIE. Haraam ingredients are utilized in almost all ‘halaal’ certified products.
The appearance of the HAM ingredient on the packets of haraam chips is not a mistake. These satanic ‘mistakes’ are a recurring issue. When consumers discover the ‘mistake’, then only will SANHA come to know of it. In the numerous cases of malpractice ‘mistakes’, the discoveries were made by only consumers, never by SANHA’s so-called supervisors. The claim of supervision is a satanic lie and rubbish.
If the satanic ‘halaal’ SANHA logo is not permitted by SANHA to appear on packets if the product contains synthetic HAM, then by what logic does SANHA certify the plants where such HAM is produced? The convolution of SANHA’s illogical principle is the effect of the crave for haraam boodle which is extracted from entrepreneurs against their volition.
Sight should not be lost from the fact that the so-called synthetic HAM does have the flavour and odour of real VARK (SWINE FLESH). Minus these essential pork-aligning attributes, ham-flavour will be meaningless. Even if the satanic food of synthetic HAM is without any real pig ingredient, it will be HARAAM to consume it. It is haraam for a man to say that he is having sexual relations with a prostitute when the woman is his wife. If at the time of sexual indulgence with his wife, he ruminates on another woman, then this ‘synthetic’ sex with the prostitute in mind will be recorded as zina in his Book of Deeds by the Recording Angel.
SANHA and the conglomeration of other carrion halaalizing outfits have absolutely no valid argument for certifying the meat and chicken establishments of the kuffaar. Their only valid shaitaani argument to soothe themselves is the boodle factor. For the sake of haraam monetary gain, they have ruined the Imaan of ignorant Muslims, their own Imaan and have driven themselves towards the precincts of kufr with their brazen and blatant violation of Allah’s commands.
Muslims who devour the meat, chicken, chip and other such products certified by SANHA and the other shayaateen outfits, have no valid argument to justify their haraam consumption. On the Day of Qiyaamah, passing the blame to SANHA will be of no avail.
“And, eat from the wholesome and lawful (halaal and tayyib) foods which Allah has provided for you, and fear Allah in Whom you believe.” (Al-Maaidah, Aayat 88)
20 Zil Hajj 1440 – 22 August 2019
SHELLAC- THE HARMS OF HARAAM SUBSTANCES
Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Shareef:
“O People! Eat from the earth that which is halaal and tayyib, and do not follow in the
footsteps of shaitaan. Verily, he is your open enemy. Verily, he instructs you with only evil
and immorality, and that you fabricate on Allah what you know not.”
Everything haraam is satanic and injurious to Insaan. Whatever Allah Ta’ala has made haraam, is harmful to us both physically and spiritually. The ordinance of Haraam is
not related to only the moral and spiritual spheres of life. It has a direct impact on even our physical bodies and life. Disease is the physical consequence of consuming haraam
substances. The ingredient Shellac is in this category of injurious substances. Shellac is the excreta of the female lac bug. Islam has made haraam the consumption of insects. By what stretch of wild imagination did ‘muftis’ find a loophole for declaring bug exreta to be halaal boggles the mind. The excreta of this female bug, namely Shellac, is
extremely powerful in its effects. Besides its usage in foodstuff, its other uses are as wood
finish, and a ‘tough all-natural primer. It is a sanding sealant, tannin-blocker, odour blocker, stain, and high-gloss varnish. It seals out moisture, hence is used in electrical applications. Gramophone records were also made from shellac. In the western world “shellac was the dominant wood finish until it was replaced by nitrocellulose lacquer’.
These insects suck the sap of trees and constantly excrete ‘stick-lac’. Delicious excreta
for SANHA. Their continuous excreting is remarkable. While excreta is naturally attracted by kufr, it is most surprising and lamentable to observe Muslims consuming with pleasure ‘foodstuff’ containing the SANHA-halaalized excreta. “Shellac is a natural polymer and is chemically similar to synthetic polymers, and thus can be considered a natural form of plastic. It can be turned into a moulding compound when mixed with wood flour and moulded under heat and pressure methods, so it can be classified as thermoplastic. …..Shellac yields a coating of superior durability and hardness. It was used as a oneproduct finish (combination stain and varnish-like topcoat) on decorative wood panelling used on walls and ceilings in homes.” What corruption does it do in your stomach? Other uses of shellac is for knotty pine panelling, on kitchen cupboards and hardwood floors. It is also used as polish for violins and guitars, toilet articles, picture frames, boxes, inkwells, dentures, as protective and decorative coating for cycle handlebars, as a harddrying adhesive for cycle tyres, particularly for track-racing,
binder in ink, protective coating on paintings, primer coat on wood. Shellac is an effective sealer and barrier against water vapour penetration. Most certainly it will drastically affect the bodily fluids and adversely tamper with the functioning of the internal organs. It has a variety of other uses as well. This is the substance that is
ingested by human beings. What harmful and injurious effects it exercises on the human body and its delicate internal organs can be imagined. Its E number is E904. It contains
crushed insects. So beware of this haraam, poisonous excreta of the female lac bug.
Despite the smallness of their size, the urine and excreta of insects can be dangerous.
The waste matter of insects has powerful effects. The following report appearing in The
Herald, 14 April 2011, is an eye-opener as to the power of the haraam excreta-poison
which SANHA has halaalized.
Worm wee gives chillis more heat
AN Australian farmer claims worm urine is helping him grow a chilli so hot it makes a jalapeno taste as mild as a strawberry.
The Trinidad Scorpion Butch T is so fiery that cooking with it requires protective clothing, including a face mask, Marcel de Wit said. He has had his harvest tested
and said it scores 1 463 700 Scoville heat units. Jalapenos rate just 2 750 on that scale
and Tabasco sauce 30 000. De Wit has put in for a world record, hoping to dislodge the
Naga Viper, which is recognised by the Guinness Book of World Records as the hottest
chilli variety.- Sapa-DPA
The consumption of halaalized carrion chickens has obliterated the villainy and gravity of eating crushed insects and SANHA-halaalized bug excreta. So dead has become the
Imaan of SANHA, that is if they have any Imaan left, that SANHA has taken great pleasure to announce the halaalization of the bug excreta describing it to be wholesome and halaal. What else can to be expected from the experts in the art of halaalizing rotten, diseased, haraam carrion?
THE MAJLIS VOL 20 NUM 09 MAY 2011
SHELLAC- HALAAL OR HARAAM?
Q. On the question of Shellac, SANHA has changed its stance. From haraam
SANHA has made shellac now halaal. SANHA’s previous statement on Shellac
was: “Whilst Shellac is generally defined as a secretion of the lac insect, our investigations have revealed that Shellac does not only comprise of the secretion but also
insect residue which cannot be avoided and this forms part of the ingredient. SANHA has
researched, and consulted with various Muftis on the issue of Shellac for almost two years and exhausted every possible angle on this issue. The Muftis are unanimous that Shellac is not permitted for consumption.” SANHA has made a most surprising turn-about, and now its new statement reads:
“SANHA is pleased to announce that the Shellac ingredient used in confectionary, bakery, and pharmaceutical products amongst others, has been declared HALAAL. Muslim consumers may enjoy Halaal suitable products containing Shellac.” How did the haraam become halaal?
A. The HARAAM became ‘halaal’ by the usual carrion tricks and stunts of SANHA, the carrion halaalizer. These incorrigible carrion halaalizers have an inordinate appetite for haraam riba money which they acquire in their carrionhalaalizing shaitaani trade. Just imagine! ‘Two years exhaustive investigations and the unanimous fatwa of a panel of muftis’ declared this substance haraam. Now suddenly the haraam Shellac has become ‘halaal tayyib’ to be enjoyed. What has happened to the ‘two years of investigations’? On what did the muftis now base their ‘halaal’ fatwa? What constrained them to review all the facts of the two years of study? SANHA and the muftis owe to the Muslim community and to Allah Ta’ala the obligation of publishing all the arguments for the hurmat and the hillat of Shellac. Why conceal the arguments under the mountains of haraam, rotten, diseased, halaalized carrion chickens?
Let SANHA produce the detailed fatwas of the muftis for scrutiny. The issue of shellac is straight forward and simple. SANHA’s talk of having researched shellac for two years and that a whole panel of Muftis had to probe the issue as if it dealt with something extraordinary is plain skulduggery. The simple truth is that shellac is derived from insects. In fact it is the excreta of insects. Eating insects is Haraam. How can it then be halaal to consume the excreta of something which is haraam? SANHA should be asked to provide the arguments of the Muftis who had earlier ruled that shellac is haraam, as well as their latest arguments on which they base their fatwa of permissibility. After all, these arguments are not ‘military’ secrets. They must release their full fatwa. After two years of intense probing and studying they had issued the fatwa of haraam. Now they fabricate an opposite fatwa. It will be interesting to see what their new arguments are.
Shellac is haraam. All edible products containing this haraam substance are HARAAM. SANHA’s haraam fatwa is the effect of mercenary motives – to gain haraam revenue for further halaalizing a range of haraam products.
THE MAJLIS VOL 20 NUM 09 (MAY 2011)