DISEASES ARE NOT CONTAGIOUS, BUT THE EFFECTS OF SINS ARE!
FROM THE MALFOOZAAT OF HAKEEMUL UMMAT MOULANA ASHRAF ALI THANWI RAHIMAHULLAH
Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “LAA ADWAA – There is no contagion.” “A sick person does not infect a healthy person.”
Q. A person takes a Covid test. The test shows positive. Either they are symptomatic or asymptomatic. There are 4 questions that arise:
(A) They, in accordance with government guidelines, isolate for the stated period in the belief of indiscriminate contagion. What is the state of such a person’s Imaan and Nikah?
(B) Some argue, that Islam teaches us to take reasonable precautions and this constitutes a reasonable precaution. This in reality is a disingenuous argument to cover for their belief in contagion contrary to the explicit teaching of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam. What is the state of such a person’s Imaan and Nikah?
(C) Persons in above 2 categories then tell others that they should test themselves and isolate if need be. In other words they are pushing their ideology on to others. How should a Muslim deal with such requests which are constant?
(D) There are many “Muslims” who hold such beliefs. Does this mean a whole swathe of them exit the fold of Islam?
A. 1) If the isolation is self-imposed, not forced by the zaalim government, and if this person has been informed that disease is not contagious, then his belief based on what the atheists inform him, is kufr. He should renew his Imaan as well as his Nikah.
2) While Islam advises laymen such as us to adopt reasonable, lawful precautions, it NEVER advises adoption of kufr. Kufr is not a precaution. It is satanism. If these protocols of the atheists are valid precautions, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah would have adopted same on the command of Allah Ta’ala. However, the Qur’aan and Sunnah emphatically negate these acts of shaitaan being precautions. Please read the numerous articles and booklets we have published on this subject. All are available on our website.
3) Their ideology and advice to others are kufr with the same consequences mentioned in No.1 above.
4) Most certainly it “means that a whole swathe of them exit the fold of Islam.” And, this is not surprising because Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had predicted this type of kufr which cancels Imaan. Hadhrat Abdullah Bin Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu) narrated the following Hadith:
“An age will dawn when the people will gather in their Musaajid and perform Salaat whilst not a single one will be a Mu’min.”
FROM THE MAJLIS 26/03
DEVIATE MACKOOJI’S KUFR ON CONTAGION – OUTRIGHT REJECTION OF RASULULLAH’S EXPLICIT DECLARATION
“LAA ADWA” – “THERE IS NO CONTAGION IN DISEASE”
(Rasulullah- Sallallahu alayhi wasallam)
Some miscreant, Mackoojee, parading as a ‘mufti’, in a flapdoodle article consisting of some flaccid arguments to bolster his baatil, kufr opinion of ‘validity’ of contagion, blatantly and stupidly misinterpreting Qur’aanic Verses and Ahaadith, says:
“PROOF FROM THE QUR-AAN AND HADITHS OF CONTAGIOUS SICKNESSES”
Pandemic or not, wherever your death has been decreed, you will taste death. The Qur-aan talks of a nation that fled an epidemic and left their native city fearing a plague death.”
Then the moron presents the Qur’aanic Aayat:
“Have you not seen those who left their homes, thousands in number, to escape death? So Allah told them: “Be dead”. Then He raised them alive…. (Baqarah:243)
According to the tafseer on the ayah, Allah Ta’ala sent a very severe punishment to that nation that He killed them all. All died. Then Allah Ta’ala revived them again through their prophet’s dua’s.”
Just what is the deviate trying to prove with this Aayat? The Aayat knocks out the bottom from his kufr contagion view. Allah Ta’ala had slain the entire populace of tens of thousands because they believed in contagion as the Mulhid Iblees Mackooji believes and propagates to promote the wares of Bill Gates, Pharma & Iblees. This miscreant’s brains are convoluted with kufr, hence he stupidly proffers this very Aayat which denounces and proscribes the shirki/kufr idea of contagion.
The thousands believing in contagion had fled from their town/city and went into self-imposed quarantine to, fleeing from Maut which they believed they could thwart by escaping the hallucinated ‘contagion’ of the plague which had ravaged their town. Despite Mackooji conceding that the flight of the populace from the plague was such a sin which justified “a very severe punishment”, the jaahil presents this Qur’aanic Aayat to substantiate the kufr of the atheists and to peddle the wares of Bill Gates, Pharma & Iblees. There is absolutely not the slightest vestige of proof in this Qur’aanic Aayat for the hallucinated validity of contagion.
Excreting another LIE, the Mulhid, Mackooji says:
“According to a tafseer, Samiriyi the person who misled Bani Israeel with the calf statue in the absence of Musa a.s. got the curse of a contagious sickness that he was condemned to stay away from people and continue saying: “No touching please.”
The condition which had settled on Saamiri was a Curse which had a peculiar effect which may not be interpreted as Adwaa (there is contagion) in negation of the explicit ‘Laa adwa’ declaration of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). A command of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) on which is based a Shar’i mas’alah may not be abrogated with a peculiar occurrence applicable to a specific person thousands of years prior to the Islam taught by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). On the contrary, the Qur’aan abrogated even the Taurah, Injeel and all previous Shariats. It is the height of jahaalat and kufr to attempt abrogation of the directives of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) with episodes which had transpired thousands of years ago. The episode of Saamiri mentioned in the Qur’aan Majeed has absolutely no relevance to contagion. Saamiri’s condition was a lifelong punishment imposed on him for his treacherous idol-making. His condition was peculiar and exceptional.
Citing another Hadith, Mackooji translates: “The sickly contagious should not be brought close to the healthy.” Either he is too stupid or he is guilty of chicanery for not translating “Laa adwaa”, mentioned in the very same Hadith. Firstly, there is no mention in the quoted Hadith about “sickly contagious” as the miscreant mentions. While the word ‘sick/sickly’ is mentioned, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) did not say “sickly contagious”. This is a lie and a kufr fabrication attributed by Mackooji to our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). On the contrary, negating contagion, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) states in the very same Hadith: “Laa adwaa”. After negating contagion, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) mentions the ‘sick’.
Secondly, the ‘sick’ mentioned in this narration cited by the jaahil fake mufti, refers to sick camels, not to human beings. The advice of not bringing the sick camel in touch with healthy camels, was due to the embedded kufr contagion belief which lingered on in the hearts of people since the era of jaahiliyyah, and to this day this kufr idea persists. In fact Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had said that this idea will continue lingering in the hearts of the people, hence he explicitly and emphatically refuted it by saying: “Laa adwaa’.
It is kufr to present a narration to refute the explicit declaration of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). An interpretation should be found to reconcile the apparent contradiction, or a suitable meaning should be ascribed to it, and in the event of inability to reconcile, it should be set aside. But it may not be presented to set aside, refute and abrogate what Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had explicitly ordered.
In another flaccid bid to prove existence of contagion, Mackooji presents a Hadith which he translates:
“Reported in Muslim that a leprous man was between the Thaqeef group of people (that came to Madina). So Rasulullah Swalallahhou Alaihi Wasallam sent to inform him that: “We have already taken his oath of allegiance from far and hence he should step back.”
Then, the miscreant jaahil presenting his kufr interpretation of this nafration, says:
“Allegiance is done normally hand with hand. But Rasouloullah (Swalallahou Alaihi Wasallam showed us to keep distance from contagious disease.”
This is a blatant lie ascribed to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) by the jaahil, mulhid, bogus mufti. There is absolutely no reference to “keeping distance” from the sick. Whatever the reason was for instructing the leper to return, it never was maintenance of devil’s distance as these munaafiqeen of our day are observing at the behest of the atheists.
The jaahil fails to understand that the leper was not ordered to separate himself from the delegation in which he was. The other members of the group were not ordered to distance themselves from the leper. The leper was not ordered to go into quarantine, The people of Thaqeef were not ordered to adopt devil’s distance from the leper. The leper was not prevented from the Musjid. The leper was not isolated in any way whatsoever. He was only instructed to return. If the reason was to adopt devil’s distance, Rasulullah (Sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) would have ordered this. He would not have contented himself with only the return of the leper. This leper freely mingled with society. He was not isolated in any way. There is no proof whatsoever in this Hadith for the contagion theory which the mushrikeen and atheists propagate and which the munaafiqeen have lapped up.
Committing more fraud, Mackooji cites the Arabic text of a Hadith, but deceptively and dishonestly translates only a portion which in his necrotized mind he believes supports the contagion theory of the atheists. Thus he says:
“Hazrat Abu Hureirah r.a. said Rasouloullah Swalallahou Alaihi Wasallam said:
“….run away from a leprous just like you run from a lion.”
Then adding his stupid commentary, he says:
“Normally, it is sunnah to visit a sick and make du’as for him. But here we are prescribed by medical sunnah to stay away from contagious diseases. Hence all healthy precautions prescribed by our health authorities is under this sunnah protocol of protecting oneself from contagious diseases.”
We do not know for how many dollars acquired from the atheist authorities has this miserable jaahil mufti sold his Imaan. He very stupidly and cunningly omits in his translation. This miscreant as well as all other munaafiqeen are misinterpreting Qur’aanic Aayaat and Ahaadith, not for reconciling apparent contradictions as is the practice of the true Ulama. The objective of these mkscreants is to use and misuse the Ahaadith to peddle and promote the kufr theories of the atheists. They have bartered away their Imaan for dollars. They have been appointed as agents of Iblees to promote the covid satanism of Bill Gates, Pharma & Iblees.
The aforementioned Hadith in which the miserable jaahil has committed chicanery begins off with the explicit negation of contagion. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“Laa adwaa (there is no contagion), no tiyarah, no haammah and no safar.” After making this explicit declaration, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) added the portion of fleeing from the leper. Whatever the reason for fleeing from the leper may be, it was never because of contagion because Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) refuted contagion before making mention of the leper. Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) made it abundantly clear that there is “no contagion”. He preceded the leper portion with negation of contagion thereby clarifying that fleeing from a leper is not on account of contagion. Whatever the reason may be, it is not contagion, hence the negation stated explicitly by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
If the disease was contagious, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) would not have first negated contagion. But, we see that before mentioning about the leper, our Nabi corrected the shirki belief of contagion which was embedded in the minds of the people. The manner of the expression of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) means: Flee from the leper. However, leprosy is not contagious. This is the clear purport of “Laa adwaa” mentioned before proffering the advice of fleeing from a leper, and this portion of the Hadith, that is, “Laa adwaa” has been concealed by the Mackooji chap in a futile attempt to hoodwink ignoramuses.
Tiyara refers to bad omens. Haammah are owls bringing bad luck in terms of the shirki belief of the Mushrikeen. Safar is the belief that misfortune befalls people during the month of Safar. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) refuted all three beliefs of shirk in the same breath, in one statement.
Further negating the contagion rubbish promoted by the Mackooji jaahil, is the fact that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah during the plague did not flee from infected persons. On the contrary, they all huddled together in the Musjid. It is indeed an act of egregious perfidy to utilize the Hadith of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to refute him and to negate the explicit Laa adwaa declaration made by our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
The logical conclusion of negating contagion, that is, interpreting Laa adwaa to mean adwaa, is to also confirm the validity tiyarah, haammah and safar just as the rubbishes confirm validity for contagion despite the express negation stated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
The rationale underlying the advice to flee from the leper was because of the embedded belief of contagion in the minds of the people, especially the simple village folk and Bedouins. It was a belief so ingrained that it could not be easily eradicated from fickle minds. Precisely for this reason Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“Four things of Jaahiliyyah will remain in my Ummah. (1) People will not abstain from taunting on the basis of lineage (i.e.racialism). (2) Wailing (on the occasion of someone’s death). (3) Rain is caused by the moon. (4) The belief of contagion.”
Today even these moron molvis, paper muftis, sheikhs and the glut of munaafiqeen believe in the very same shirki concept of contagion which Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had refuted more than fourteen centuries ago. The atheists have perpetuated this belief of shirk, and at their behest the jaahil mufti is promoting the shirki belief.
Whilst Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) negated contagion, the munaafiqeen extravasate the very opposite by refuting Rasulullah’s explicit negation of contagion. And, this they do to bootlick the atheists for the dollars. Now why did the jaahil Mackooji conceal the ‘Laa adwaa’ statement which preceded the leper issue? His hidden kufr agenda is quite conspicuous.
Furthermore, despite the advice to flee from the leper, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), himself did not flee. On the contrary, he ate with a leper from the same bowl, saying: Have Tawakkul! This was Rasulullah’s practical refutation of the shirki belief of contagion. Both verbally and practically, by word and deed, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) negated contagion.
Regarding the Hadith which prohibits people from going to a region affected by a plague, the jaahil Mackooji flaunting his kufr-coated jahaalat comments:
“The sunnah teach us to visit the sick. But in these contagious cases, we are instructed to take medical precautions of distancing and segregating.”
Only brains necrotized by kufr are capable of venturing such rubbish understanding of the Hadith. While outsiders are prohibited from entering the epidemic zone, the thousands within the plague-afflicted locality are not ordered to adopt the stupid, ludicrous, satanic ‘medical precautions of distancing and segregating’. Those within the precincts of the plague-ravaged area who are the ones most at ‘risk’ of contracting the disease according to the theory of the baboonist atheists who happen to be the handlers of Mackooji and others of his ilk, are not segregated. The Hadith does not prescribe any devil’s distancing or devil’s segregating for them. No protocols have been prescribed for them by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alahyhi wasallam). The only protocols which Muslims, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah knew during a plague was to rush to the Musjid and increase Istighfaar and Dua.
If contagion was a reality, most certainly, Allah Ta’ala would have revealed detailed protocol guidance to adopt as precautions against the hallucinated contagion. The theory of contagion and its meaning are not new. This was known to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). He made specific reference to it, negating and refuting it. Now whoever promotes the opposite in refutation of the explicit Laa adwaa declaration of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), eliminates his Imaan.
5 Rabiul Awwal 1443 – 12 October 2021
Shariah on Vaccines
| Note: The following is a publicly endorsed declaration by Mufti Ahmad Sadiq Desai and his body of Ulema at Majlisul Ulama of South Africa and other esteemed Ulema. If other Muslim leaders, Imams or Ulema would like to add their public endorsement of the declaration below then contact us by clicking HERE. For additional declarations from other Ulema see by clicking HERE. For a current list of public signatories see by clicking HERE.|
Urdu version of the declaration below now available click HERE
Electronic Poster for the declaration below click HERE
Printable Poster for the declaration below click HERE
DECLARATION ON VACCINES:
Timely Reminder of the Shariah on Vaccines
The Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Allah has not placed a cure for your diseases in things that He has forbidden for you.” (Baihaqi, Bukhari). And Allah has forbidden constituents that are inextricably harmful as the Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam also said: “There (must be) no harm and no harming.” (Ibn Majah). And hence ‘vaccinations’ as we know them (including the current globally propagated COVID-19 vaccines) are not permissible by the Creator as vaccines contain proven harmful components such as:
bacteria, aborted fetal tissue, cells and blood from animals, harmful chemicals and neurotoxins such as formaldehyde, phenoxyethanol, mercury, aluminum and others.Vaccines can cause serious health problems, including permanent injuries and death.*
“Do not kill yourselves, indeed God is the Most Merciful upon you.” (Qurʾan: 4:29)
“Do not throw yourselves into destruction with your own hands. Do good, for God certainly loves those who do good.” (Qurʾan: 2:195)
Rather than being a treatment for the sick human body, vaccination introduces, in most cases, cancerous and neurotoxic substances. In other words, clearly harmful contents are administered into a healthy body. No case in the acquittal of the clear harmful outcomes of vaccination will have any legitimacy as long as the exponents of ‘vaccination’ fail to rationally respond to the solid medical findings of injurious effects, including permanent injuries and deaths caused by this particular intervention of ‘vaccines’ as known today.
After acquainting oneself with the overwhelming evidence of the clear harm and thus haraam of “vaccines” of the current criminal capitalistic drug manufacturing establishments a true Muslim will never believe that Shifa (healing) is contained in this concoction of neurotoxins and poisons, and, would never forget the irrefutable fact that Allah has not ordained the Shifa of His Ummah in the defiled – in najaasat – and substances which He has made harmful.
If one just takes a look behind the sophisticated veneer of the pharmaceutical industries’ propaganda the published proofs by medical experts conclusively proving the irreparable damage that vaccines cause to the human being are insurmountable. This makes more than clear the impermissibility to inject najaasat into our Allah entrusted bodies. Note it is by clear default according to the plain nass of the Shariah that “vaccines” as currently known are Haraam and thus Muslims will be held accountable by the Creator of consenting to this najaas intaking/injecting brew. For a Muslim supporter of vaccines the onus is on him/her to present an evidenced “fatwa” to make this obvious haraam concoction of vaccination as permissible – this task would be a tenuous one to say the least especially after being apprised of the overwhelming evidence of the clear harm and danger of ‘vaccinations’ since its inception from the late 18th century. Hence it is Waajib to abstain from the rijs (filth) of ‘vaccines’ just like it is obviously Wajib in Islam to abstain from taking/inserting a known poison into a healthy body.
“He makes lawful to them what is good and pure and prohibits them what is foul and impure.” (Qur’an 7:157)
*For References & Resources on the Inextricable Harm/Haraam of “Vaccines” click HERE.
TAHA KARAAN’S RED HERRING DEFENCE OF HIS KUFR ACTS
In a misleading article, captioned ‘IF ONLY SOMEONE ELSE SAID IT’, Karaan vainly attempted to draw an analogy between our strident criticism of all kufr of the munaafiq cartel and the manner in which Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) had acquitted himself in response to Hadhrat Ubaidah (Radhiyallahu anhu) who was in disagreement with Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) for not visiting the plague-stricken region.
When Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) had decided to return to Madinah without going to Amawaas where a plague had broken out, the Commander of the Islamic army, Hadhrat Abu Ubaidah who is one of the Ashrah Mubash-sharah, objected. He said: “Are you fleeing from the Qadr of Allah?” Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) responded: “Would that someone else had said so.”
With this episode, Karaan seeks to mislead Muslims. Karaan’s deception is twofold: (1) He implies that fleeing from a region ravished by a plague is justified by Hadhrat Umar’s action. (2) His response to Hadhrat Abu Ubaidah was extremely mild and shorn of acrimony.
With this episode Karaan seeks to divert attention from the core issues we have criticized. This is a red herring attempt in which the people of baatil such as MJC, NNB and bogus uucsa are adept.
Firstly, Karaan has not presented Hadhrat Umar’s decision to return to Madinah with honesty. He has concealed certain facts. In his article, Karaam says: “Umar called the commanders of his Syrian armies into conference. Along with the senior Sahaabah who had come with him from Madinah, they took their seats on the ground……….Opinions differed. Some felt that the journey should go ahead, while others thought it undesirable that the Muslim leadership should enter a land in which plague was spreading. Umar listened attentively. When the time came to decide, all fell silent. Everyone’s eyes were fixed on Ameerul Mu’mineen. “I and those with me will return to Madinah.”
The smattering of imagery and flowery expressions Karaan uses in his article does not add to the truth. With such expressions he seeks to impress morons.
The factual scenario on the occasion was not as flowery as Karaan presents in his red herring. Karaan has conveniently omitted an important aspect of the conference. It was not one conference. There were three conferences attended by different personalities. It is not the way Karaan has deceptively paraphrased the detailed account of the Hadith.
All did “not fall silent” as Karaan alleges. In fact, Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu) anhu ordered the groups of the first two conferences to “get away”. “All eyes” were not “fixed on Ameerul Mu’mineen” in the stupid flowery expression of Karaan. The fact is that the groups with opposing views clung to their respective opinions, hence Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) was unable to formulate a decision on the basis of certitude. He therefore called for a third conference in which none of the participants of the earlier two conferences were called.
The issue as described in the Hadith kutub was as follows:
“Umar Bin Al-Khattaab (Radhiyallahu anhu) departed for Shaam. At Sargh he met the leaders (commanders) of the armies: Abu Ubaidah Bin Al-Jarraah and his companions. They informed him (Hadhrat Umar) that a plague has broken out in Shaam.”
Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) was in a quandary. He felt the need to consult others on the issue. Thus, he instructed:
“Call the First of the Muhaajireen.” They were called. Then he consulted with them. He informed them about the plague in Shaam. They differed among themselves. Some said: “You have left (Madinah) for a mission. We do not view (it proper) for you to return.”
Some of them said: “With you are others and the Ashaab of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). We do not regard it proper for you proceed with them to this plague.”
The difference of opinion was annoying to Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu). He therefore ordered: “Get away from me!” Then he said: “Call the Ansaar.” The Ansaar were called. They too differed as the Muhaajireen had differed. Umar ordered: “Get away from me!” Then he said: “Call for me from the elders of the Quraishi Muhaajireen who are here.” They were called. Not even two persons among them differed (There was unanimity among them). They said: “Our view is that you should return with the people and do not proceed towards this plague.”
On the basis of the unanimous decision / advice of the senior Quraishi Muhaajireen, did Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) decide to return and not proceed to Amawaas. Initially, it was not his decision as Karaan deceptively attempts to trade. The unanimous advice of the Quraish elders was bolstered by a Hadith of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), which was narrated by Abdur Rahmaan Bin Auf (Radhiyallahu anhu) who was not present during the initial discussions. The Hadith states:
“Verily, I heard Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) saying: ‘When you hear of a plague in some region, then do not go there. And, if it occurs in a region where you are, then to not flee from there.”
Thus, Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) neither fled from the plague nor did he go to the region of the plague because this was the command of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) which he had understood even before the confirmation by Hadhrat Abdur Rahmaan Bin Auf (Radhiyallahu anhu). His understanding was the effect of two factors:
(1) The unanimous advice of the senior Muhaajir Quraishi Sahaabah.
(2) Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “If a Nabi had to come after me, it would have been Umar.”
His firaasat was such that Wahi would arrive to confirm the correctness of his view, i.e. during the time of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
In this episode there is not the slightest shred of justification for the load of kufr rubbish and shaitaaniyat disgorged by Karaan, the MJC, the NNB, bogus uucsa and the myriad of munaafiqueen who have gone haywire in their satanic effort to bolster and justify the kufr theories of the atheists pertaining to plagues.
What motivated Karaan to write about this episode which has absolutely no bearing and no relationship with the kufr of:
Suspending Jumuah Salaat
Prohibiting the daily Fardh Jamaat Salaat in the Musaajid
Closing the Musaajid
Pleading with the kuffaar court to retain the ban on the closure of the Musaajid and on Jamaat Salaat
Introducing hordes of shayaateen into the Musaajid with the ‘social distancing’ measure of the atheists. The satanic wide gaps are filled with devils according to the Hadith.
Prohibiting musaafahah and muaanaqah (handshaking and embracing)
Isolating even healthy people
Donning niqaabs of the Shayaateen (the horrible masks of the atheists).
Underlying Karaan’s citation of Hadhrat Umar’s episode is the evil motive of hoodwinking the unwary and the ignorant regarding the Islamic stance pertaining to epidemics / plagues. Karaan’s attempt is actually to peddle the idea that even Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu) supported the ‘contagion’ theory of the atheists. But this notion is the furthest from the truth.
There is absolutely no contention regarding avoidance of a region where a plague has broken out. The command of the Shariah in this regard is clear and concise. Outsiders may not go to such a place. But those in that region should not flee believing that they will perish in consequence of the plague apprehending them. Anyone who is earmarked by Allah Ta’ala for apprehension by the plague will not escape his fate whether he is inside or outside the plague-ravished area.
Furthermore, we are not interested – Muslims should not be interested – with the rationale for the command not to flee from the plague area and not to go there. As Muslims we have to submit to the Commands without questioning the rationale and wisdom of the instructions of the Shariah. The Deen is not the product of our thinking and understanding. It is the Product of Wahi.
The target of our criticism is the aformentioned list of kufr acts in which Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) does not feature.
While Mr. Karaan seeks to capitalize on the mild reaction of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) to the objection of Hadhrat Abu Ubaidah (Radhiyallahu anhu), and with which he (Karaan) thinks he has scored some points over us on account of the manner of our criticism, he either conveniently overlooks or is blissfully ignorant of the general and permanent attitude of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu).
Hadhrat Umar’s whip is famous and he is famed as the ‘Man of the Whip’. He walked the streets of Madinah with whip in hand ever ready to enforce the Shariah on recalcitrants and villains of the MJC and NNB type. The episodes of his ‘harshness’ for the sake of the Deen and the Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala are numerous. If Allah Ta’ala grants us the taufeeq, we may compile a book with all such episodes of Umar’s ‘harshness’ for the benefit and intellectual edification of Karaan’s brains. His fierce and ‘harsh’ attitude in defence of the Haqq was such that people would flee from him. Hence, our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) supplicated to Allah Ta’ala:
“O Allah! Have mercy on Umar. The Haqq has not left a single friend for him.”
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) mentioned that even Iblees was so scared of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) that he (Iblees) would not walk in the street in which Hadhrat Umar was walking. The devil would make a wide detour to avoid crossing paths of Ameerul Mu’mineen Sayyiduna Umar Bin Al-Khataab (Radhiyallahu anhu).
Senior Sahaabah were stricken with fear when they realized that Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radhiyallahu anhu), the First Khalifah, during his final illness, was about to appoint Hadhrat Umar to succeed him as the Khalifah. They were fearful of his ‘harshness’.
The true nature and attitude of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) is not correctly nor honestly portrayed by the episode which Mr. Karaan highlights for scoring stupid and silly points.
If Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) was today present to witness the kufr and shaitaani shenanigans of Karaan, MJC, Reverend Bham, NNB jamiat and all the other bogus and munaafiq entities and characters, his famous Durrah (Whip) would have taken adequate care of the cartel of enemies of Allah, and the Friends of the Kuffaar Court – the Fiends of Allah who abhor the Houses of Allah, hence their licking the boots of the atheists to retain the ban on the closure of the Musaajid.
Now that the government has granted permission for houses of worship to partially open, the munaafiqs are seeking to take credit for this crumb offered by the authorities in terms of their laughable and oppressive levels. The munaafiqeen are now pretending to be pleased with the partial opening of the Musaajid. Since they have lost considerable support in the Muslim community and have become aware of the disgust of Muslims, they (the munaafiqeen) are seeking to appease Muslims with their belated hollow support for the Musaajid.
In the episode of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) cited by Karaan, there is nothing, absolutely nothing, to bolster the host of haraam and kufr acts of the munaafiqeen (MJC, NNB jamiat, bogus uucsa). Some of the worst munaafiqeen are the medical doctors who have blatantly demonstrated their true kufr colours. They are true kuffaar scoundrels.
Did Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) order the Musaajid to be closed during the plague? Did he order suspension of Jumuah Salaat? Did he prohibit the daily Jamaat Salaat in the Musaajid? Did he prohibit Tilaawat of the Qur’aan in the Musaajid? Did he instruct observance of kilometre gaps in the Salaat sufoof thereby inviting droves of shayaateen into the Musaajid? Did he prohibit musaafahah and muaanaqah? And what was the attitude and the action of the Jamaat of Sahaabah during any plague? Did they don the devil’s niqaab during the plague? Did they observe even a single kufr act which the munaafiqeen are propagating at the behest of the atheists?
Karaan’s motive underlying his deceptive citation of Hadhrat Umar’s episode is to create the idea that his departure from the plague-stricken zone or his abstention from visiting the place is justification for the host of kufr acts introduced by the munaafiqeen during this bogus pandemic.
“And, who is a greater oppressor than the one who prevents the thikr of Allah’s Name in the Musaajid, and who strives in the destruction of the Musaajid?
29 Muharram 1442 – 18 September 2020
“FLU OR PLAGUE”
One of the Wives of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “O
Rasulullah! During the night I heard you making a dua. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“Verily, I supplicated to Allah that my Ummah should not be destroyed by
means of famine. This was granted to me. And, I supplicated that internecine warfare should not plague my Ummah. This was denied to me. Then I said:
‘In that case, Flu or Plague (thrice).”
Muslims should now understand well that whether it is a flu or a plague which wrought mass destruction with millions perishing, for the true Mu’mineen it is a blessing and the means of Shahaadat while for the
kuffaar and Munaafiqeen, and the villainously evil fussaaq / fujjaar Muslims, it is an Athaab.
QUR’AANS MESSAGE FOR THE CARTEL OF MUNAAFIQ BOOTLICKER OF THE ATHEISTS:
“Say (O Muhammad): ‘O you kaafiroon! I do not worship that (atheists and idols) which you worship. And you do not worship what I worship. And I do not (and shall not) worship what you worship. For you is your religion (of atheism to bootlick), and for me is my (glittering) Deen.’ ” (Surah Kaafiroon)
“No person will die except at the appointed time with the permission of Allah.” (Qur’aan)
“Whatever calamity befalls you, is on account of what your hands have wrought. And He forgives in abundance (your transgressions).” (Qur’aan)
This pandemic of satanic fear has sifted out the people of nifaaq and kufr from the People of Imaan. While the people of Imaan follow the Qur’aan and Sunnah, the cartel of bootlicking munaafiqeen follow the kufr theories of the atheists.
These minaafiqeen bootlickers satanically use Qur’aan and hadith to “prove” veracity for the Satanism of the atheists. They grovel in the gutters to find Hadith proof for the kufr ideologies of the atheists.
The camel has to be tied only within the fetters of the Qur’aan and Sunnah. Beyond these limits is kufr.
“These are the limits of Allah. Whoever transgresses these limits verily he has oppressed his own soul.”
Turn the pages of history to see and understand how our Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahabah had tied the camel in the plague of Madinah and in the plague of Amwaas.
The plague moves, assaults and kills by Allah’s Command. No one can flee from Maut. While the ideology of the atheists advocates flight from the sick who are in need, Islam commands visiting and aiding the sick – not abandoning them as the theories of the Satanists demand. Cowardice is integral to kufr and nifaaq, hence they abandon even their aged parents believing that maintaining a distance will save them from Maut.
The Munaafiqeen should search for themselves another religion and cease masquerading as Muslims. There is no space in Islam for these bootlicking munaafiqeen. These munaafiqeen are the slaves of the atheists who wallow in janaabat and kufr. They follow and lick these atheists right into the “lizard’s hole”, while the Mu’mineen follow the pure and holy ta’leem of the Qur’aan and Sunnah besides which there is no other directive for us. Our Pathway is bright and glittering, leading to Jannat whereas there is nothing but darkness and Divine Wrath for the Munaafiqeen who cherish an inveterate aversion for Salaat, for the Musaajid and for Islam. Like Iblees, they abhor Sujood. Iblees is their guide in abstention from Salaat and the Musjid. Our Abodes of Rahmat are the Musaajid, while the abodes of La’nat for the Munaafiqeen are the malls of the atheists whose boots they lick night and day. The La’nat of Allah and His Malaaikah are on them.
Increase Istighfaar, Durood Shareef and Kalimah Tayyibah. Keep the focus on Allah Ta’ala.
May Allah Ta’ala take us from this dunya with our Imaan intact. Aameen!
15 Zil Qa’dh 1441 – 7 July 2020
Many years ago, during a pandemic that spread through a district of India, Moulana Ashraf ‘Ali Thanwi (rahimahullah) had written this book as a ‘post pandemic treatment’ for the Iman and souls of the Muslims.
This temporary world and it’s losses, are definitely not worth grieving over. As Muslims, we should focus on the Akhirah (Hereafter).
This book revives one’s belief in the concept of Akhirah and instills a renewed desire for Jannah. A portion should be recited daily in the homes with the entire family gathered. With the help of Allah, we will physically witness the good effect of this.