KHATAM BUKHARI JALSAH

FOOD FOR THOUGHT
Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (Rahmatullah alayh) narrates in Husnul Azeez:
“Haafiz Ahmad Saahib, the Principal, narrated that Haaji Imdaadullah Saahib (Quddisa sirruhu) said: ‘Molvi Muhammad Qaasim Sahib (i.e. Hadhrat Maulana Qaasim Nanotwi) had always accepted wholeheartedly whatever I had said to him verbally or in writing. However, once he gave me such a curt reply which left me stunned. It was the occasion after the dismissal of Nawaab
Muhammad Ali Saahib, the Raees of Tonk when he desired to organize Khatm-e-Bukhaari in the Haram of Makkah Muazzamah. (He requested Hadhrat Haaji Sahib to intercede on his behalf for Hadhrat Nanotwi to participate in the Khatme Bukhaari jalsah. Hadhrat Haaji Sahib said to Maulana Nanotwi): ‘I have already promised Nawaab Muhammad Ali Saahib. You should now participate in the Khatam.
However, Maulana Nanotwi responded: ‘Hadhrat! I did not study Bukhaari Shareef for this.”
(Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi commented): “This had a very profound impact on Hadhrat Haaji Sahib.”
In this episode there is much food for thought and soul searching for those who enact Maulana Nanotwi Jalsahs and Khatm-e-Bukhaari Jalsahs. Even seniors fail to apply their minds when organizing these jalsahs which are functions of takabbur, riya and israaf. From the refusal of Hadhrat Maulana Nanotwi (Rahmatullah alayh) to participate in the Bukhaari jalsah held even in the Haram Shareef of Makkah Muazzamah and despite his Shaikh requesting him, others who organize such jalsahs using his name should reflect deeply and try to fathom their hearts and nafs: Would Hadhrat Nanotwi be happy with these jalsahs?

TAKEN FROM THE MAJLIS VOL 24 NUMBER 4

RAMADHAN 1438 /JUNE 2017

MUFTI TAQI’S BOMBSHELL COMMENTS ON THE BID’AT OF KHATM-E- BUKHARI JALSAS

The comments of Mufti Taqi Uthmani were made on the 12 March 2021 at the Annual ceremony of Khatm Bukhari Jamia Darul Uloom Education of Quran Raja Bazar Rawalpindi

Transcription follows:

Now since there is very little time, I shall therefore, Insha Allah, according to the directive, recite the last Baab of Bukhari Shareef Insha Allah, and my dear students have submitted that I give them ijaazat of Hadith. Insha Allah I shall do that as well.

However, before that I wish to submit (guzaarish) something. The guzaarish is that for some time now the ceremonies of Bukhari Shareef that have started in every street, every neighbourhood, every Madrasah; in such a way that I fear that these are going in the direction of Bid’at. This is also becoming an Urs. And I am the culprit behind it. For perhaps I was the first; upon Hazrat Maulana Nazeer Ahmed Saheb telling me in Faisalabad’s Jaamia Imdaadiyah Khatme-e-Bukhari. I attended and for several years I would attend.

At that time this thing was not so widespread. But now for Khatm-e-Bukhari elaborate invitations are printed and handed out; notices are put up and then people are invited; and then someone is called from out of town; an extravagant gathering (ijtima) is enacted. My heartfelt appeal is that this should be reviewed.

This is a place [the Madrasah] where Bid’aat are uprooted. They are uprooted or not? So, if from here, if the end of this Bid’at is announced then it will be much appreciated. Or I don’t say that it is a Bid’at, but it will become (a Bida’t), if such importance is attached to it. Is it not so, O Maulana Abdul Ghaffaar Saheb? (Jee, Jee)

For this reason, it is my appeal that you reconsider. There were Khatm-e-e-Bukharis in Darul Uloom Deoband as well. There were also by Hazrat Shaikhul Hind (Rahmatullahi alaih); also by Hazrat Shah Anwar Shah Saheb Kashmiri (Rahmatullahi alaih) also by Hazrat Maulana Madani (Rahmatullahi alaih). Did you ever here that those illustrious personalities organized a Huge Jalsah for Khatm-e-Bukhari?!

Since some things initially seem appealing, however, later when it is incumbently carried out, and if any Madrasah does not have it then it is looked upon as strange. “They did not even have a Bukhari Khatm!”. So, this Iltizaam Maa Laa Yalzam (making incumbent that which is not incumbent) is in fact the beginning of Bid’aat.

So my request to all my brothers and friends; Maulana Abdul Ghaffaar is sitting; Maulana Zahoor Ali’s son is sitting; my request to all of them is, and I shall, Insha Allah also send this message out, that in future do not allow this to become a Bid’at. If there is dastaarbandi then let it be. However, the Saheeh Bukhari Khatm with the title Saheeh Bukhari Jalsah which are now taking place, I understand that we should desist from it. (Emphasis added)

End of Transcript

‘PRECAUTIONS’ OF TAQI UTHMANI

THE KUFR ‘PRECAUTIONS’ OF TAQI UTHMANI

Peddling the bogus covid wares of his handlers in the Pakistani government, Taqi Uthmani with regard to the hallucinated ‘second wave’, said: “Practice on all the precautions with diligence. Hospitals are full.”

What are these ‘precautions’? And, for what are the ‘precautions’? Even for genuine and valid expediencies only precautions which are lawful in the Shariah may be adopted in general while men of Taqwa have the Shar’i right to abstain from even such valid and Islamically lawful protections. Once, Ameerul Mu’mineen Umar Bin Khattaab (Radhiyallahu anhu) was severely indisposed. A Sahaabi suggested that a hakeem should be called. Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) said: “If I know that the cure for my sickness is only in lifting my hand and placing it on my head, I would desist from it.” In dismissing the suggestion to resort to medical treatment, his lofty degree of Taqwa constrained the display of this attitude of Tawakkul and Ridha. He was pleased and contented with the Will of Allah Ta’ala.

Hadhrat Junaid Baghdaadi (Rahmatullah alayh) was suffering from a severe eye problem which threatened blindness. The hakeem / doctor who examined him advised that whilst he will be under treatment, he has to abstain from applying water to his eyes thereby implying abstention from Wudhu. Hadhrat Junaid (Rahmatullah alayh) said that he was prepared to accept blindness, but not abstention from wudhu despite Tayammum being permissible in the circumstances. Thus, he refused the hakeem’s treatment.

While we lack such lofty states of Taqwa and Tawakkul, it does not follow that we have to jettison our Imaan from our hearts by submitting to the kufr of the atheists and peddled by their agents such as Taqi Uthmani and other scholars for dollars of similar ilk.

The ‘precautions’ advised by the mudhil agent of the atheists refer to the haraam covid protocols structured on the haraam basis of the kufr theory of contagion which was explicitly and emphatically refuted by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) by word and deed. Aggravating the hurmat of the conditions is the bogey of the ‘second wave’. In fact there was not even a ‘first wave’. The whole mess is a Bill Gates trillion dollar conspiracy into which he has succeeded to rope in most of the moron government officials. Taqi Uthmani and the ulama-e-soo’ cartel are all members of Hizbush Shaitaan (The Legion of Iblees), hence they lick the boots and hinds of the western atheists most obsequiously, and they do so with relish in view of the chimera of the dollars dangling infront of them.

THE DEVIL’S PRECAUTIONS

(1)The niqaab of Iblees: While Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) forbade that the face be covered during Salaat, Taqi Uthmani and the whole gamut of Hizbush Shaitaan insist on donning the niqaab of Iblees. They believing that by muzzling themselves so hideously, they will be able to thwart Allah’s decree. Even muzzled dogs present a better spectacle than those buffeted by fear into these satanic protocols of the atheists.

The Sahaabah would sharply jerk off any face-covering from the face of a musalli. Covering the face during Salaat for any reason other than the kufr theory, is haraam. But donning the hideous niqaab of Iblees on the basis of the kufr contagion theory of the atheists is kufr. It is for this reason that Salaat behind a moron imam donning the niqaab of Iblees is not valid.

Regarding the niqaab of the devil, the moron mufti asks: “What Hardship is there in wearing a mask?” We say that you, Taqi Uthmani, are either too stupid to understand the hardship involved in donning the niqaab of Iblees, or you are deliberately pretending to be oblivious of the hardship in obedience to your handlers.

Firstly, it is haraam to don the niqaab of Iblees during Salaat. Secondly, the rationale underlying the niqaab of Iblees is kufr. Thirdly, it is an imposition of corrupt, brutal mafia gangster personnel. Fourthly, it is in violation of Allah’s natural law of exhaling filth from the body. Allah Ta’ala has ordained that filthy air and menstrual blood be expelled from the body. Besides the kufr factor, inhaling and retention of filthy air and putrefied haidh blood bring in their wake diseases which have extremely harmful health consequences in the long term. While filthy air has to be incumbently expelled from the body, the devil’s niqaab constrains the diffusion of the filth into the body. All things unnatural have harmful consequences.

Fifthly, the physical discomfort caused by covering the face, especially on hot days, is a cruel hardship imposed by governments in league with Bill Gates.

The Devils’ social-distancing

Many Ahaadith explicitly inform us that the gaps between musallis in the Salaat sufoof are occupied by the shayaateen (devils). Thus, there will be a preponderance of devils in all the Musjids converted into weird temples where the satanic protocol of ‘social-distancing’ is observed. It is therefore not permissible to join a mixed congregation of humans and devils. Perform Salaat at home if a valid Jamaat is not available.

Besides the factor of devils filling the gaps, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) also mentioned that the effect of the gaps in the saff is disunity in the hearts. It causes enmity and disunity among Muslims.

The number restriction

It is haraam to debar any Muslim from entering the Musjid for Salaat. Yet, this miserable bootlicking mufti supports the protocol of the atheists limiting the number of musallis. When the protocoled number is reached, musallis are debarred entry. While this satanic restriction is haraam for all Salaat, it negates the validity of Jumuah Salaat. According to the Hanafi Math-hab, Jumuah is invalid on the basis of two evil factors: (a) The condition of Ithnul Aam is violated. (b) It is a condition structured on the basis of kufr.

Taqi Uthmani and the rest of Hizbush Shaitaan come fully within the glare of the Qur’aanic Aayat: Who is a greater zaalim than the one who prevents the Thikr of Allah’s Name from the Musaajid of Allah, and who strives to ruin the Musaajid?”

Besides the aforementioned three devilish haraam ‘precautions’ presented to Taqi Uthmani by his kuffaar handlers, there are several other haraam/kufr conditions which have been explained in many of our articles on this topic. These are available on our website.

Hospitals

The claim by Taqi Uthmani, viz, ‘hospitals are full’, i.e. full of covid victims, is a blatant, satanic lie. This misinformation has been fed to him by his handlers. Either Taqi is aware of the falsity of this claim or he is too dim in the brains to understand and to ascertain the misinformation which has been disgorged into his mouth. A Brother from Karachi, Pakistan, commenting on the rubbish excreted by Taqi Uthmani writes:

“Last night my uncle let me listen to mufti Taqi’s recent audio on corona. Thereafter we called a hospital. We ascertained that they were not filled as mentioned by mufti Taqi in his speech. I have ascertained from other hospitals as well and have realized the gross amount of exaggeration by him.”

Many people from U.K. and other countries have informed us of similar blatantly false claims of hospitals overrun with corona patients.

Rasulullah’s Warning for Muslims

Hadhrat Abu Tharr (Radhiyallahu anhu) narrates: “Once I was walking with Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), and he said: ‘Besides Dajjaal something is more fearful for my Ummah.” He mentioned this statement thrice. I (Abu Tharr) said: “O Rasulullah! What is this which causes you greater fear for your Ummah than even Dajjaal?” Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: ‘Aimmah Mudhilleen!”

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had a greater fear for the Aimmah Mudhilleen than for even Dajjaal. The gravest danger for the Ummah is the Aimmah Mudhilleen. They are the scholars for dollars –the ulama-e-soo’ – who misguide and mislead the Ummah with their corrupt, baatil, zigzag fatwas. And, they do so for worldly, monetary, mercenary and nafsaani objectives.

6 Jamaadil Awwal 1442 – 21 December 2020

ENEMIES OF THE DEEN

MOLVIS – ENEMIES OF THE DEEN

A Brother from the U.K. writes:

Two days ago, a few Local Authority Officials are ‘reported’ to have visited 1 or 2 local Masaajid here in UK and are ‘reported’ to have found all the silly Covid-19 measures in order except for their observation of noticing a few Musallees, although wearing face-masks, not covering their noses. They are reported not to have even logged this observation.

However some local Scholars have blown this visit and supposed ‘indiscretion’ of not covering noses out of all proportion claiming, the sin of any Masajid being forced to close will fall on the person not wearing a facemask.

They justify their ruling by quoting Mr Taqee Uthmaani and describing it as ‘waajib.’

No comments are ever made for the wanton neglect of face-masks in supermarkets, restaurants, markets, public transport, pubs, beaches, mass demonstrations, sporting events and a host of other venues of futility and sin.

However, this visit by Covid-19 Officers has gone viral with those very Maulvis trumpeting the possible ‘doomsday’ scenario of Masaajid Closures – who were the first to meet and issue a verdict to close Masaajid in UK over six months ago – well before any Government Ruling on closure of Places of Worship.

They quote Mr Taqee Uthmaani’s fatwa on following the laws of any country wherein we are residing, whilst maintaining silence when Charity and other Criminal Laws are brazenly flouted by their associates.

(End of letter)

COMMENT

Molvi Taqi’s fatwa is baseless. Increasingly, he is veering from the Path of the Akaabir Ulama and issuing fatwas to appease the modernist palate. In terms of the Shariah he is now person’a non grata. The brains of these deviant scoundrel molvis have been rendered impuissant with kufr.

While the ‘scholars’ of deviation were the very first scoundrels to close the Musaajid even well before the atheists had ordered the closure, they are now quick to shift the blame of their kufr to Muslims who seek to uphold the Deen. They have converted the Musaajid into some weird temples completely alien to Islam. It is not permissible to perform Salaat in the Musaajid if the host of kufr conditions of the atheists has to be adopted. In this case Salaat should be performed at home if there is no Musjid where Salaat is performed as commanded by Allah Ta’ala.

Regarding the Satanist conditions ordered by the authorities, there is no imperative need to submit. Muslims do have a choice – the choice of performing Salaat in a weird temple in conflict with the Sunnah and Shariah, and the option of performing Salaat correctly at home. By opting for performing Salaat at home, there will be no infraction of the laws of the atheist government, while at the same time the command of Allah Ta’ala will be correctly fulfilled.

Molvi Taqi and the other corona virus bootlicking molvis are very selective in their obedience and submission to governments. When it suits their whims and monetary objectives, they conveniently forget about obeying the government. They squander millions of dollars in haraam structures in their Darul Ulooms. The bulk of the money is transferred from foreign countries via channels which are criminal in terms of the laws of the atheist governments. Since these molvis indulge in these crimes and the crime of tax evasion and other attendant issues, they have a different standard in this regard. However, regarding the Deen, they have exhibited an appalling attitude of bootlicking to appease the atheist authorities.

Why did these scoundrel molvis close the Musaajid at a time when it was not required by the government? There is a deep underlying sinister objective, in fact a satanic plot to destroy the Deen. The munaafiq molvis and sheikhs all over the world, including South Africa, had decided to close the Musaajid even before the government had issued this satanic and draconian order. The unanimity with which the scoundrel ‘scholars for dollars’ had conducted themselves was not a chance coincidence. It was a planned plot vomited into their mouths by their atheist masters. The yield was extremely lucrative in terms of dollars. The government story fielded by Molvi Taqi and others of his ilk, is another satanic red herring to deflect Muslim focus from the real issue, namely, the plot to destroy Islam by gradual satanic interference and dismantling.

Performing incongruous ‘salaat’ in a Musjid converted into a temple, one will be in violation of the Shariah. Gradually, people will adopt the kufr style permanently and crooked molvis with crooked brains driven on by monetary objectives will dig out from the kutub ‘proofs’ to condone the kufr methods and ways innovated to change the entire Face of Islam. No one has harmed the Deen as much as these scoundrel molvis have. It is not at all surprising that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had described the molvis and sheiklhs of times in proximity to Qiyaamah as being “the worst of the people under the canopy of the sky from who will emanate fitnah.”

3 Safar 1442 – 21 September 2020