A few Musallis of our Musjid have decided to break the lock which the trustees have put on the Musjid door, and have their own Jamaat Salaat according to the Sunnah. Is this permissible?

Q. A few Musallis of our Musjid have decided to break the lock which the trustees have put on the Musjid door, and have their own Jamaat Salaat according to the Sunnah. Is this permissible?

A. It is permissible and commendable. The Musjid is not the property of the trustee devils. They did not inherit the Musjid from their fathers. The Musallis have the right to dismiss the trustees and to appoint other trustees who will not conduct themselves as these munaafiqeen do.




Question: The Majlis quoted a Hadith which states that when disease / calamity descends from the sky it is deflected from the Musaajid. An anonymous maulana claims that this Hadith is a false attribution to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Is the Hadith authentic? Please comment on the claim of the maulana.

Answer: What the moron said is false. Briefly, this maulana character is a moron at the minimum. His stupidity is perfect. He is bankrupt in the knowledge of Hadith. Our advice is that thispaper ‘muhaddith, and moron ‘mujtahid’ should apprize himself of the rudiments of Istinja to ensure that his act of cleansing himself is valid. Invalid Istinja has a detrimental effect on the brains of a person who has gleaned a smattering of ‘knowledge’. In view of intellectual dysfunctionalism, the fellow simply disgorged some egoistic drivel without understanding the gravity of branding a Saheeh Hadith ‘false’ and a ‘lie’.

Nowadays, neo-Salafis and stupid so-called ‘deobandis’ who lack in Ilmi expertise are the victims of moronic Salafi anti-Hadith propaganda. As a result these moron molvis who have become too big for their boots suffer from the malady of deglutition. They lap up just any drivel the Salafis excrete.

The Hadith is authentic and has been affirmed by senior Muhadditheen and Fuqaha who were experts and well aware of the conditions for authenticity of Ahaadith many many centuries prior to this moron molvi appearing on earth. The few lines which the moron has written in his silly attempt to brand the Hadith false portrays his stupidity and total lack of understanding. His expertise in the sphere of Hadith is a conspicuous NIL.

This is a very brief comment on the stupid denial of the authenticity of the Hadith by the anonymous molvi. In view of the pedestal of authenticity assigned to the Hadith by the Fuqaha, there is really no need to waste time with the drivel the moron has disgorged. One of the Signs of Qiyaamah is the denial of Ahaadith which have been accepted and used as Mustadallaat by the Authorities of the Shariah from the era of the Salafus Saaliheen.

The limit of the stupid ‘knowledge’ of all of these Salafi and neo-Salafi morons is Al-Baani who passed away just yesterday.

The acceptance by the Fuqaha of a Hadith is the highest category of authentication which overrides the views of even the greatest Muhadditheen.

15 Jamaadiyu Thaani 1442 – 29 January 2021




Question: According to a Hadith published by The Majlis, people in a Musjid are safe from contracting any disease. A Mufti says that it is possible for a disease to be contracted in a Musjid. What is the correct interpretation for the Hadith? Is the Mufti right?


The Hadith in question is: “When disease descends from the sky, it is diverted from the people of the Musaajid.”

Now, when Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that disease is diverted away from the Musjid, it is imperative for the Mufti Sahib to renew his Imaan. His implied refutation of the categorical negation of disease in the Musjid by our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is kufr. The Hadith is sufficient for us, the Mu’mineen. There is no need for lopsided interpretation to accommodate zigzag fatwas which are the inspirations of Iblees, and which are pliantly designed for acceptance by sceptic minds which incline to kufr. What the Mufti said is baseless and stems from doubt and uncertainty.

Disease descending from the sky is turned away from the Musaajid. Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said so with emphasis just as he proclaimed Laa adwaa (Disease is not contagious). This is absolute. Thus, no one will contract the disease in the Musjid as the super-munaafiqeen claim. If a musalli contracts the disease, it does not follow that he had contracted it inside the Musjid. He acquired the disease outside the Musjid by the decree of Allah Ta’ala. So if a diseased person comes to the Musjid it does not follow that he became diseased inside the Musjid. He came from outside with the disease.

There was no need for the Mufti to have embarked on his unnecessary exposition and baatil extrapolation which ostensibly is in refutation of the claim of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

Furthermore, if a munaafiq becomes afflicted with the disease in the Musjid, it simply means that Allah’s Athaab has overtaken him. There is no place for the munaafiq to hide and to save himself from Allah’s Athaab. While the descending disease dare not afflict the Mu’mineen, the munaafiq is divinely earmarked for Allah’s athaab, hence the Musjid offers no succour for him. The athaab befalling the Munaafiq in the Musjid in no way whatsoever negates the veracity of our Nabi’s categorical claim.

It is correct that the virus will not afflict one in the Musjid because Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said so. Hitherto no one has proved nor can prove that anyone contracted the covid satanism inside the Musjid.

It is incorrect to understand that the plague can enter the Musjid on account of it being a mercy and a cause for Shahaadat. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that a plague will not settle in a Musjid, and this was said bilaa tafseel. The hukm is general, without exceptions, hence may not be restricted, watered down or assailed with zigzaggery by means of personal opinion to titillate the palates of those whose Imaan is riddled with doubt and uncertainty to the degree of kufr.

There is no reason for interpreting away the clear, apparent (zaahiri) meaning of the Hadith. There is no other Hadith conflicting with this Hadith. Hence there is no need for reconciling conflicting narrations with any interpretation. If some decrepit mind conjectures some mirage of conflict based on an oblique vision of realities on the ground, then the safest for his Imaan is to hammer out an interpretation to argue away into oblivion the ostensible contradiction. But never should he resort to an interpretation which will entangle him in kufr.

Kufr has become a norm in the Ummah. There is an imperative need for extra-diligence when dealing with Ahaadith which appear contradictory to minds scarred and jarred by the flotsam of kufr spewed out by the university education. While the Qur’aan emphatically declares: “This is the Kitaab. There is not the slightest doubt in it”, the brains of Muslims of this era have become necrotized with doubts, uncertainly and even downright kufr, hence the stupid apologetic baseless interpretations in the kufr bid to appease the convoluted brains of the modernist zindeeqs such as the KUFFAAR medical doctors whose kufr, the juhhaal molvis are lapping up. Allah Ta’ala says:

“The Haqq is from your Rabb, therefore, do not become of the doubters.”

While HIZBUSH SHAITAAN, bootlicking the Atheists says that the Musjid is a ‘super-spreader” of disease, Allah Ta’ala, via His Nabi says that disease which descends from the sky is diverted away from the Musjid.

6 Jamaadiyu Thaani 1442 – 20 January 2021













  • MENK




20 Jamaadil Awwal 1442 – 4 January 2021



By A Brother from U.K.

‘They have taken their rabbis and their monks-as well as the Maseeh, son of Mary-for their lords beside Allah, although they had been bidden to worship none but the One Allah, save whom there is no deity: the One who is utterly remote, in His limitless glory, from anything to which they may ascribe a share in His divinity!’ (Glorious Qur’an, 9:31)

Today we are witnessing the total transformation of our Masaajid and Madaris into Theatres/Stages for the final appearance of Dajjal. Neither our Masaajid nor our Madaris any longer appear to have a spiritual link to the Office of Nabuwwat and the Maslak of our Salf-e-Saalihoon (pious predecessors).

Copies of the Glorious Quran have been removed, by Muslims themselves, from shelves and placed in storage – out of bounds. No atheist government official nor any law enforcement officer entered our Masaajid to even suggest let alone remove them. A conglomerate of Munaafiq Councils and treacherous Maulvis/Muftis masquerading as senior scholars and shuyook issued disgraceful bootlicking guidelines, verdicts, posters and categorised even the wearing of Shaytaan’s niqab as Waajib. Like supine and spineless morons, other Imam’s, Maulvis, trustees, committees and Muslim medical personnel latched onto these guidelines like vultures and scared witless, implemented them without question.

O Muslims! Not a single person is observed reciting the Glorious Qur’an in our Masaajid now – it has been snatched away from our hands whilst there are thousands of Huffaz and Maulvis in our midst.

If this rate of degeneration continues, how long before it is snatched away from our hearts?

In reality, it already has for the overwhelming majority of Huffaz who remain are now Ramadhaani Hafiz – they can only swat up the few Rukus they are due to recite in Taraweeh – and with calls for lockdown to continue until next Ramadhaan, the damage to this unique institution of Hifz will be dramatic as calls are heard to reduce Taraweeh from 20 Rakaats to 8.

This was the first time in history of Haram Shareef and Masjid An Nabawee where only 8 Rakaats of Taraweeh were recited. Elsewhere in Arabia, the Wahaabi/Salafi had managed to reduce it to 8 Rakaats – but even they had not dared to instigate such measures in Haramain Sharifain until today.

The headlong plunge of taking the Madrasah atmosphere away from the Cave of Hira and onto online platforms has already seen traditional Madrasah Talabah Numbers and attendance dramatically reduced.

Enter the ubiquitous ‘Koran Club;’ where hybrid Munaafiq Maulvis, Apas and Muslim Teachers treat the Glorious Quran, with connivance of Muslim Parents as another subject in the curriculum to be taught as an act of convenience so everybody is free by 5pm. What atheist education officials had tried for centuries to achieve, namely cut the Muslim child off from the Glorious Quran and Maktab, Muslims themselves have enacted with their own hands.

Some jerk has already rendered Juz Amma into a comic version and it has circulated within Ulama Forums without a murmur. Offer some naseehah to any of these celebrity shaykhs and their lackeys will raise a furore – but not a word from any Maulvi when the Glorious Quran is either withdrawn, shelved or reduced to a comic. Now online lessons are replacing the age-old Maktab system. Websites are springing up offering diplomas and certificates, all for a fee. Pictures of Celebrity Shaykhs and Female Tutors appear (sometime superimposed together) on glossy posters and flyers, approving all these businesses, programs, seminars, workshops, etc, etc.

As Masjid donations and Madrsah fees continue to drop, Maulvis have come up with promoting Maulviwood (televised programs) to welcome the ‘return’ of Makshoofaat into our Masajid.

The rulings and fatwas of Ameerul Mumineen t and Umm ul Mumineen t prohibiting Masjid attendance for Ladies are brushed away by liberal Maulvis themselves. They will not hesitate to use gender-equality, LGBT and a host of other atheist government laws to hoist upon the Masaajid their ploys. To attract ladies and remove all barriers, it was necessary for these Celebrity Shaykhs to first enter Muslim homes via the media of YouTube, Netflix, Facebook and WhatsApp.

Under guise of promoting Islamic Values, History, Heroes, Heroin’s and the ubiquitous call for Islaah, Turkish Drama’s and Tours to Balkans were widely promoted within Muslim Circles (at a national and international level) by this new breed of Maulvis, Muftis and Shuyookh.

Such Celebrity Shaykha will embark on an all-expense paid tour with a film crew (Khuddam) in attendance – to photograph, video-record and write up these grand tours, revival of the Ottoman Empire and ‘Halal Holidays’ in Balkans, Bodrum, Antalya, Marmaris, Masjid Aqsa, etc., etc.

Surreptitiously, Muslim minds are being conditioned to accept the appearance of firstly, Makshoofaat and thereafter Dajjal in these bizarre temples. The majority of men, especially the Huffaz, Maulvis and Tableegh Jamaat brethren have for one nafsaani reason or another – stopped attending Masaajid – the void will now be filled by Makhshoofaat. Anarchy will reign – as this gender fights its way incrementally onto Masaajid and Madrasah Committees with their promise of donations, jewellery, gifts and picnic hampers.

In desperation, mercenary Maulvis, Imams, Crank Sufis and Vainglorious Trustees will accept all their demands – quoting fictitious government rules, regulations and guidelines. Token separate entrances and screened areas will be designated as a precursor to full intermingling and the appearance of Dajjal.

First, we witnessed the appearance of gawdy TFT Monitors on Masaajid Walls, apparently to display Salaah Times and Sunnah Du’a. Now, these very screens are being used to promote collection and appeal for so-called worthy causes. Already Qira’at, Naat, Nazm, Islaahi Programs and Tours of Celebrity Shaykhs are being broadcasted. Thereafter so-called Islamic Drama Programs will follow.

The Masjid will open a few minutes before a sham performance of Fardh Salaah – despite many congregating outside before and after, nobody will be able to stand together in Jamaat, or perform Tahayatul Masjid or Wudhu herein. Immediately thereafter the handful of Musallees who attended will make way for the exit and the Masjid is locked. Before our Masaajid were scented with perfume – now these temples are sprayed with alcoholic desanitizers. Even the humble Madrasah bench (patla) is wiped umpteen times and despoiled with chemicals before a child may place his kutub thereupon. Priests will argue over the percentage content, source of alcohol and permissibility thereof and the fiqh ruling of Covid 19 measures – but the reality is every single act of defilement possible has already been enacted.

The reason why Allah Ta’ala has highlighted in the Glorious Quran the treachery of the Banu Isra’eel Ulama is to warn the Maulvis of this Ummah not to follow in their footsteps; not to commit the same blunders of compromising and diluting Deeni Ahqams; not to bootlick the wealthy and affluent for pecuniary gain. If Maulvis continue to do so, the same fate which affected the Banu Israeel awaits us…

‘And do not overlay the Haqq with falsehood, and do not knowingly suppress the Haqq…’ (Glorious Qur’an, 2:42)

11 Safar 1442 – 29 September 2020


Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“Laughing in the Musjid will be zulmat (darkness) in the grave.”
“Conversation in the Musjid devours good deeds just as cattle devour grass.”
Numerous among the Ulama and the Tabligh Jamaat are lamentably oblivious of the prohibition of conversing and laughing inside the Musjid. At times their talk is so loud as to be a befitting sign of Qiyaamah.
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that among the signs of Qiyaamah is that “voices will become loud in the Musaajid.”
The worst culprits in this misdeed are the so called people of piety –
molvis and tableeghis.
Even whilst the Athaan is being proclaimed, they continue private discussions right inside the Musjid.

Laughter and worldly talk are sacrilegious inside the Musjid.
When even reciting the Qur’aan Majeed loudly in the Musjid is not permissible when musallis are present, how can indulgence in worldly conversation and laughter ever be permissible? The total indifference in this regard renders these misdeeds kabeerah (major sins).

Will The Real Aya Sofia Please Stand Up?

They say history is the biography of great men and women. Well, history is also the story of great buildings. This case is rarely more painfully obvious than when it comes to identity of The Hagia Sophia or Aya Sofia (“the Holy Wisdom”).

Church, Mosque, Museum: the Aya Sofia has lived under many guises over the years and each transformation came hand-in-hand with momentous political change. This year, it was no different.

By reverting to the previous designation of Aya Sofia into a mosque, the Turkish courts have set off a firestorm of controversy across the world. It is understandable that faithful Christians would object. The sense of loss they must feel is the same feeling that many Muslims get when they see the Grand Mosque of Cordoba’s conversion into a cathedral. However, what is confusing is that some Muslims are also conflicted – or even downright hostile – to the idea of the Aya Sofia being used as a mosque.

Why are they upset? Is there weight to their feeling that this was an act that was against the laws and spirit of Islam? How true is it that this was pure political theatre?

A summary of the arguments are detailed below as each point reveals a great deal about us as Muslims today and our current mentality:

1. “It should just remain a museum…”
The Aya Sofia IS remaining a museum. The ruling states and the government echoes that it is a mosque and museum but, unfortunately, if you read the headlines you will be given the impression that the museum is being destroyed. This is not the case.

The world is full of buildings with dual functions. The White House is the seat of government and the residence of the President. The Vatican is a museum, a church and the home of the Pope. St Paul’s Cathedral is a tourist attraction as well as functioning church. If Muslims alone were somehow exempt from the ability to combine museum and mosque in one building, then that would be very strange indeed. Yet that is exactly what opponents of the mosque designation are saying.

What opponents for the reversion of the building are arguing for is not for the preservation of the museum – in fact, it will be more accessible than ever by becoming free and open till the late evening – but for the prevention of worship in a building that was built and intended for that very purpose.

2. “It was illegal to turn it into a mosque in the first place…”
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: many Muslims quote the example of Umar (R) and his treatment of the Church of The Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. In fact, this is the number one excuse used by many so-called Muslim intellectuals who lazily have projected their own biases on to our pious predecessors. They say, not without a little pious sanctimony, that Umar (R) exemplified that Islam is not a triumphalist religion and – though he could have converted the church into a mosque – he chose not to.

For most of history, it was common practice that any conquering army gained full ownership of the conquered lands. Islamic law was actually quite progressive in this regard, stipulating that property in surrendered lands would remain with their owners and not the conquerors. It was only if a land was taken without surrender, according to Imam Al Qurtubi amongst others, should their properties be forfeit. Jerusalem surrendered and Damascus surrendered. Constantinople – despite multiple attempts requesting it to do so – did not. Therefore, Islamically and according to the norms of the time, the conversion of the Church into a mosque was legal.

This is highlighted by the case of a district of Constantinople called Psamatya (present day Koca Mustafa Pasha) whose residents surrendered to Muhammad Fatih separately. The area had the highest density of extant churches, since none were touched or taken over.

3. “But it has been a museum for so long now, so why turn it back?”

Some sources say that they have found evidence of the Church being purchased by Muhammad Fatih with his own money. The evidence has yet to be verified by external sources although it is accepted by the Turkish authorities, but even if you withhold it, the established status of the entire complex as a Waqf (Islamic endowment) is definitive. Waqfs cannot be unilaterally taken over or converted to another use.

The reality is that the conversion of the Aya Sofia from mosque to museum was a highly contentious decision taken in a manner that went against the then legal, moral and spiritual standards. It was a state sanctioned action to satisfy a political objective of the hyper-secular post-war Government. This was an injustice and it is not a good look to say that an injustice should be allowed to continue because it has been there for over eight decades.

4. “We don’t need more mosques in Istanbul…”

Would anyone think it reasonable if their local mosque was taken over unilaterally by the Government and then, when they ask for it back, they are brushed off by officials saying, “there are lots of mosques in the city and many are half empty: we are keeping this one.” Of course not. So, if it is not good enough for you, why should it be good enough for anyone else? In fact, this was the argument used by the RSS in taking over the Barbari mosque in India.

A mosque is not a property like every other. It is owned by Allah and not something we are allowed to rationalise or barter away. Allah has no need for even one mosque, but that does not mean we should stop building them or start giving them away. To go by the utilitarian argument, then anything that is not in full use by its owner is fair game for someone else to usurp. We would never accept this for our possessions so how can we accept it for something that does not belong to us?

5. “This is all a politically motivated…”

Every decision in a public sphere is political, or can be construed to be political, in some way. Building the Aya Sofia into a magnificent cathedral was a political decision by Justinian. Turning it into a mosque upon conquest was also a political decision by Muhammad Fatih. Stopping prayers in the mosque and converting it into a museum was a political decision by Mustafa Kemal. And now, returning the building to use as a mosque and museum is also a political decision by the current Turkish state.

The question is not whether it is a political act to convert the building: it will always have a political dimension. The question is whether you like the politics of someone who was praised by the Prophet ﷺ in a hadith and turned it into a mosque (Muhammad Fatih) or someone who insulted that same Prophet ﷺ as an “immoral Arab” and turned it into a museum (Mustafa Kemal.)

Pick a side.

6. “This will hurt the feelings of non-Muslims and make us look bad.”

This is perhaps the only real argument of them all that has any weight to it. All the previous arguments are intellectual (and less than intellectual) smokescreens for the desire to not hurt the feelings of others – especially when we need all the friends we can get. This is understandable given our current geopolitical situation. This is also why you are more likely to find those Muslims living as minorities objecting to the change of status, reflecting their own precarious situations in their respective countries.

However, if looking at it objectively, we see that this argument also has limitations. Muslims are equally if not more hurt at the ethnic cleansing that took place in Andalusia. Does that mean we get the Al-Hambra or the Cordoba Mosque back? What about the Parthenon – since that used to be a mosque – conquered by the same Muhammad Fatih? What about the Kremlin, where St Basil’s Basilica was made from bricks of a Tatar mosque? And can we have the Philippines back while we are all trying to not offend each other?

Making decisions such as these on the highly subjective grounds of causing offence is not only impractical, but untenable. Many expressions of Islamic faith outside a narrow paradigm of what is palatable to specific audiences, can be seen as offensive to some. If we were to make decisions based first and foremost to protect the comfort of others, you would end up with a set of groundless rituals rather than a faith. It is the equivalent of changing your name to Bob instead of Muhammad since you were worried that even Mo was too exotic. Sometimes, the proper practice of our faith and upholding of our cultural and historical traditions will upset others not because what we are doing is deliberately offensive or wrong, but because we have different values and different standards.


What is most upsetting about the change of use for the Aya Sofia is the double standard at play. Athens has not even one mosque whilst Istanbul has hundreds of churches and synagogues: yet the Greeks are calling the Turks intolerant. The Roman Catholics plundered the Aya Sofia of all treasures and took them to St Marks church in Venice (where they still are to this day): yet it is the Pope that says that he is distressed at the Muslims – who preserved the Byzantine inheritance- for turning it into a mosque and Catholic churches calling for a day of mourning.

All the commentators calling for it to not be converted back into a mosque are also correspondingly mute regarding the Granada Cathedral built on site of a mosque, or the Barbri Mosque turned temple in India, or the Al Ahmar Mosque turned into a bar in Palestine.

But this is human nature and they will shoot their shot. Nonetheless, as Muslims, if we are against the reversion of the Aya Sofia to be a mosque again, then we really need to take a long hard look at ourselves. Just as Muhammad Fatih conquered Constantinople, we need to conquer our own ignorance, our own inferiority complex and our own insecurities.



Abdullaah ibn Amr ibn al-’Aas (Radhiyallahu Anhu) reported that  Holy Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) has said that: “In the last  ages of my nation there will be men who ride on means that resemble saddles (’Mayasir’).  They will alight at the doors of the mosques.” [Narrated by Hakim in Al-Mustadrak]

‘Mayasir’ was a very costly and fine silk which the rich men used in those days to cover the saddles of their horses. This hadith means that these saddles which men will ride on at the end of times are not real saddles which are placed on the back of horses, they only resemble saddles.

Holy Prophet (Peace be upon him) in all probability is referring to those vehicles which have been invented in this era, i.e., cars and bikes. Because they have comfortable, soft, and tender seats  like saddles in earlier days. And people use these cars and bikes to go to mosques.

At earlier time camels and horses were used as means of transport. No one could have imagined of mechanical vehicles e.g motorcycles, motor cars, etc

Also in earlier days, people were not used to riding camels or horses to go praying to mosques. As villages were very small, so people used to walk to mosques.

Holy Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that people will travel on something having comfortable big seats. i.e. they won’t be riding on beasts and people would alight from them on doors of mosques.

It is a prophecy which we witness every day

when cars and bikes gather in front of the mosques…Subhanallah!

from islam reigns



“Most assuredly, We shall give them to taste of the lesserPunishment, not the Greater Punishment, for perhapsthey will return (to Siraatul Mustaqeem and the Sunnah).”(Qur’aan)
Muslims themselves, by their wanton transgression and rebellion against Allah’s Shariah, have been the cause for the the defeats the Ummah suffered at the hands of the kuffaar, and for the ultimate loss of the entire glorious Empire established by Ameerul Mu’mineen Hadhrat Umar Ibn Khattaab (Radhiyallahu anhu).
Whatever sovereignty, respect and honour Muslims had were snatched away and the Ummah has laboured and trundled the trajectory of utter defeat and humiliation for centuries. The only spectacles of dignity and little independence left were our Musaajid and Darul Ulooms where we had enjoyed much freedom and the right to worship and teach the Qur’aan and Hadith as ordained by the Shariah.
However, in recent years, added to the cesspools of inequity, fisq, fujoor, bid’ah and kufr of the Muslim community among whom the worst culprits are the molvis and sheikhs, the Musaajid and Darul Ulooms have been pillaged, plundred and desanctified by Muslims themselves. The Musaajid became transformed into halls where najis tourists, men and women, were allowed to enter and pollute. Qawwaali, bid’ah jalsahs such as so-called ‘seerat’ jalsahs, women entering the Musaajid for Salaat, mass merrymaking I’tikaaf, fussaaq qaaris, allowing zindeeqs the Musjid platform, using the Musaajid as staging platforms for kuffaar sporting teams, introducing shayaateen en masse by means of the haraam spacing, etc., etc., are all acts which defiled the Musaajid.
In addition, one of the worst acts of pillage, is the non-attendance of 90% of the community for the daily Fardh Jamaat Salaat. Another villainous misdeed of the community is to allow absolute scoundrels to be the trustees and committees of the Musaajid. The Fajr and Isha attendance is the evidence for this percentage. These are the times when generally all persons are at home.
The villainy of Muslims have made the Musaajid ornate structures devoid of Deen. About our Musaajid of these times, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “There shall soon dawn an era when nothing of Islam will remain but its name. Nothing of the Qur’aan will remain but its text. The Musaajid of the people will be ornate structures devoid of guidance. The worst of the people under the canopy of the sky will be their ulama. From them will emerge fitnah, and the fitnah will rebound on them.”
These Musaajid and the Darul Ulooms were the last remnants of our Islamic heritage. These were our little ‘empires’ where we held sway. But, Alas! Allah Azza Wa Jal has now snatched away from us these little dominions because we, with our own hands, have abused and defiled the sanctity of the Musaajid and transformed the Madaaris into mercenary and nafsaani institutions totally bereft of the Noor of Ilm. Imagine a Darul Uloom which is supposed to imbue in it the spirit and ethos of Ghaar-e-Hira, having a kuffaar sportsground.
These Musaajid, according to the Hadith, have invoked the La’nat of Allah on us, hence Allah Ta’ala has closed down the Musajid. Just imagine! You can go to the mall to acquire rubbish. But if on the way or next to the mall there is a Musjid, you are not allowed to enter and offer two raka’ts Tahyatul Musjid. This is a lamentable commentary on our own villainy.
The oppression of the government is in fact a mild form of Divine Chastisement. It is Allah Azza Wa Jal Who has empowered the government to evict us from our Musaajid. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “If entire mankind unites to benefit you in any way whatsoever, they will be able to benefit you only to the degree prescribed by Allah, and if entire manking unites to harm you, they will be able to harm you only to the degree prescribed by Allah.”

If Muslims will continue with their drunken stupor of fisq, fujoor, bid’ah and kufr, the Greater Punishment (Al-Athaabul Akbar) mentioned in the Qur’aan will overtake us. Today we have lost the Musaajid and the Madaaris. Tomorrow it can be our homes. Allah forbid! Beware! Look at Burma, Palestine and Syria, and open your brains and heart for Muraaqabah.

“Beware of such a FITNAH (Punishment) which will not be restricted to only the transgressors among you.” (Qur’aan)
The Ulama and the Buzroogs will all be swept away in its onslaught. May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on us.

2 Shawwaal 1441 – 26 May 2020


Hadhrat Abdullah Bin Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu) said:“A time will dawn when the people will gather intheir Musaajid and perform Salaat while not asingle one of them will be a Mu’min.”
The Musaajid in Germany and in many other countries have opened, and people (perhaps most of them are not Muslims) are again visiting the Musjids where a host of haraam, humiliating conditions has to be observed.
On Friday 22 May, 2020, during Jumuah, the Musjid in Berlin could accommodate only 50 persons due to the satanic ‘social distancing’ regulation. A nearby church offered to accommodate the overflow. These ostensible ‘Muslims’ went to the church where their imaam led them in ‘jumuah salaat’. The imaam overjoyed with his performance in the church infront of the cross of shirk, commented: “That is an amazing sign of solidarity in these times” said Mohamed Taha Sabry. This pandemic has made us a community. Crises bring people together”, said the mosque’s imam, who led his congregation in prayer watched over by a stained-glass window depicting the Virgin mary.
Samer Hamdoun, one of the Muslim worshippers, said the church environment took some time to get used to. “It was a strange feeling because of the musical instruments, the pictures,” said Hamdoun.”(Reuters News Agency)The shirk, kufr and haraam environment did not bother the ‘imaani’ conscience of these worshippers because they were all bereft of Imaan – the Imaan which is so vigorously emphasized hundreds of times in the Qur’aan Majeed – the Imaan for which the Sahaabah and early Muslimeen conquered the world, smashing the Roman and Persian empires.
The hallucinated ‘solidarity’ overrides Imaan for these worshippers who derived pleasure in the environment of shirk, kufr and fisq. Their imaan, if ever they had Imaan, is dead. Their worship and pleasure in the church of shirk deracinated their imaan if ever they had imaan. How can such people still profess to me Muslims when they are in entirety ignorant or repellant of the very basic and fundamental belief of Tauhid?
There is nothing – absolutely nothing that is so repugnant and so abhorrent to Allah Azza Wa Jal as shirk. A church is the abode of shirk, and about shirk the Qur’aan Majeed says: “Verily, Allah does not forgive shirk being committed with Him, and He forgives besides shirk for whomever He wills.” “Verily, the mushrikoon are najas.” “It is not permissible for the Nabi and the Mu’mineen to seek forgiveness (from Allah) for the Mushrikeen even if they are close relatives.”
The Qur’aan Majeed is replete with hundreds of Aayaat in condemnation of shirk. The doctrine of trinity, the deification of Nabi Isaa (Alayhis salaam) and Maryam (Alayhas salaam) are among the vilest beliefs of shirk condemned by Allah Ta’ala. This cannot be hidden from any Muslim who is a true Muslim. Severely rebuking the Christians, the Qur’aan majeed says:
“Verily, those who said that Allah is Maseeh, the son of Maryam have committed kufr. Maseeh said: “O Bani Israaeel! Worship Allah, my Rabb and your Rabb. Verily, whoever commits shirk with Allah, (know that) verily, Allah has made haraam for him Jannat, and his abode is the Fire. And, for the oppressors (i.e. those who believe in trinity) there will be no helpers. Verily, those who said that Allah is trinity, they have committed kufr. There is no deity but Allah The One. Maseeh, the son of Maryam is only a Messenger. Messengers have gone before him. His mother was a Siddeeqah. Both of them used to eat food……..Those from Bani Israaeel who had committed kufr (with their belief of shirk) have been cursed by the tongues of Daawood and Isaa, the son of Maryam…”(Surah Al-Maaidah)
There are numerous Verses castigating the Mushrikeen and condemning the beliefs of the Christians, but today people who profess to be Muslims find ‘solace’ in the abodes of shirk. This deracination of Imaan is the consequence of socialization and fraternization in pursuit of the shaitaani concept of ‘solidarity’. What type of shaitaani ‘solidarity’ is it which deracinates Imaan?
This kind of solidarity was rejected by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) when the mushrikeen had endeavoured to negotiate ‘peace’ with our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The Qur’aan Majeed vigorously in hundreds of Aayaat denounces and debunks a ‘solidarity’ which compromises even one iota of Tauhid.
Insha-Allah a more fuller article elaborating on this La’nat shall be published.
30 Ramadhaan 1441 – 24 May 2020