The response to our rebuttal of the zigzag fatwa of Ebrahim Desai, is nothing but a regurgitation of drivel and clutching at straws by the ZigZagger. Here we shall content ourselves to rebut his stupid straw-clutch pertaining to the notice which he has reproduced. Other issues shall, Insha-Allah, be tackled and demolished in future articles.

The purpose of the notice which was written on the board by a brother, not by The Majlis, was not to advocate wearing the mask out of Salaat. Some musallis do come to the Musjid with masks, perhaps three or four among a couple hundred musallis.

Rather than expelling such musallis from the Musjid, the notice advises them to keep their masks in their pockets. Another reason for keeping the masks in pockets at all times, is to be saved from the oppression of the kuffaar authorities when they accost one in the street.

Most certainly, it is a sign of Imaan and Yaqeen to abstain from wearing the mask. The notice does not encourage wearing masks outside Salaat. The notice contends with a practical problem with the people of Imaan are beset with in consequence of the oppressive draconian laws of an oppressive regime, which is supported by munaafiq, maajin, zig zag ‘muftis’ who misinterpret the fatwas of the Aakaabireen.

18 Zul Qa’dh 1442 – 29 June 2021

Masks in Salaah

Masks in Salaah
It is the trait of a coward to write anonymously. They lack the courage to stand firm and unwavering upon their views regardless of opposition; hence, fear constrains them to cover themselves in a niqaab and veil of anonymity. Despite ostensibly being males, they suddenly become purdah-nasheen ladies and even their voices become awrah. One such male pseudo “purdah-nasheen lady” has been writing some baatil articles under a cloak of anonymity. In a previous article he has hallucinated himself as being a Muhaddith capable of overriding the illustrious Muhadditheen of the past using his own contemporary, puerile “Jarh wat-Tadeel”. Most recently, he has brought out an article supporting the wearing of masks in Salaah as well as social-distancing, thus opposing the 1,442 years of how this Ummah has
performed Salaah and, more importantly, opposing the direct commands of Rasoolullaah .صلى الله عليه وسلم
Generally, articles written anonymously are not worth responding to, because if the writer is too much of a coward to attach his name to what he has written, then what he has written is not worth reading let alone
responding to. Nevertheless, due to some requests we have received to refute the baatil disgorged by the anonymous pseudo purdah-nasheen lady, we will answer briefly, In Shaa Allaah.

  1. He starts off his anonymous article by saying that there are two potential approaches on how to answer the issue, one of them being “using an independent Ijtihad to deal with this issue.” To “use an independent
    Ijtihad”, one has to be a Mujtahid. There are no Mujtahideen in this era, hence this point is moot and this “potential approach” is invalid and so it is كالعدم (like something that does not exist). If the anonymous writer believes himself to be capable of independent Ijtihad, then he is indeed a lost cause.
  2. His second mistake is that he says: “The Fuqaha have concluded a general rule; to cover the mouth during Salaah is disliked (Makruh).” This explanation of makrooh is incorrect. In a previous publication we wrote which was published by the Mujlisul Ulama of South Africa, the issue of makrooh was explained in detail. Those who wish to understand the issue of makrooh in more detail may refer to that publication, In Shaa Allaah. The term makrooh is a technical term employed by the Fuqahaa. Practically, there is no difference between haraam and makrooh tahreemi. The consequence of both is sin. Furthermore, the ruling of the Fuqahaa is that if Salaah is performed in a way that is makrooh, then Qadhaa of it must be done if the time of that Salaah has not yet lapsed. Makrooh does not simply mean “disliked”. The term used by the writer, “disliked”, gives the impression to the readers that makrooh means that a person has the choice of whether to do it or not. A person has no such choice. Makrooh must be avoided just as haraam must be avoided.
  3. The anonymous male purdah-nasheen lady then stupidly tries to dupe the readers by mentioning acts such as coughing, leaning against a wall for support, etc., and lumping wearing a mask and social-distancing in amongst those actions. Firstly, the Fuqahaa never spoke about wearing a mask in Salaah as is being done today: they were against a person even just covering his face in Salaah with his hand or with a turban, etc. The wearing of the “niqaab of Iblees” during Salaah is entirely different and much worse. It is therefore ludicrous for the anonymous writer to have lumped all of these actions together. Either he knows and is being devious in an attempt at misleading, or he is simply stupid. Perhaps the constant wearing of the mask has starved him of oxygen and led to his brain becoming “vermiculated”.
  4. The anonymous writer states: “In extenuating circumstances, something impermissible can become permissible.” This is a principle that is widely abused in this day and age, as each person has taken to deciding for himself what these “extenuating circumstances” are. Once again, cowardice causes these people to hallucinate extenuating factors and circumstances which do not exist in reality. Ulamaa-e-Soo’, hallucinating “extenuating circumstances”, pray in churches under crosses and in the presence of idols, attend kufr interfaith gatherings, take part in LGBTQI+ rallies, etc. For the Ulamaa-e-Soo’ these days, anything and everything is an “extenuating factor” that permits the legalisation of any haraam act in the world and even kufr itself.

    The anonymous male purdah-nasheen lady says: “When warranted by circumstances, pronouncing a statement of kufr is permitted.” What he fails to explain to the readers is what exactly those “circumstances” are. The Fuqahaa are very strict in that regard; they state that fear of being beaten up
    or even being arrested is not enough of an “extenuating factor” to permit uttering kufr. They state that the extenuating factor that permits uttering kufr is the guaranteed threat of death or loss of limb. A hallucinated threat does not count. Explaining this, they mention that if a person is threatened
    by the kuffaar that if he does not utter kufr, they will kill him after some time, then even this does not count as a valid extenuating factor which would make it permissible for him to utter kufr, unless the ones making the threat are such that there is absolute certitude that they will definitely carry it out.
    The readers can tell from this how strict the rules are for the uttering of kufr under coercion to become permitted. A person cannot utter kufr simply because of an imaginary fear or an imaginary threat that may or may not be carried out. Cowardice is highly unbecoming of any Muslim, let alone of an `Aalim of Deen. Cowardice is for kuffaar and Munaafiqeen, not for those who have Imaan in their hearts.
    Furthermore, the Fuqahaa have explained that even in such circumstances where, if a person does not utter kufr, he will definitely be killed, it is still better for him to rather not utter kufr and to choose death instead, and if he does so, he will be a Shaheed.
  5. Why has the anonymous writer translated the word غزاة as “holy battle”?
    The word means “an invasion; an incursion; a raid; an attack; an assault; a military expedition; a conquest”. It is the same as the word ghazwah. The word “holy”, however, is not connected to it. “Holy” is a term used by Christians. We, as Muslims, do not use Christian terminology. All Jihaad is for Allaah Taaalaa; if it is not for Allaah Taaalaa, it is not Jihaad, so there is no need to add stupid Christian words like “holy” to it. Jihaad is Jihaad.
    Furthermore, when the term “Jihaad fee Sabeelillaah” is used, it refers to fighting on the battlefield. Mozlem “apologists” labour tirelessly in a futile attempt at changing that meaning to anything and everything else besides fighting on the battlefield.
    For what reason has he added the word “holy” from his own side? In Islaam there is Jihaad. This term “Holy War” is taken from the kuffaar.
  6. The anonymous writer claims that when the Plague of Amwaas broke out in Shaam, Hadhrat Umar ibn al-Khattaab رضي الله عنه simply “applied his mind and decided to return to Madeenah.” That is a blatant lie. Hadhrat Umar رضي الله عنه made his decision after consulting with the senior
    Sahaabah-e-Kiraam who were present from the Muhaajireen and the Ansaar.
  7. At this point, the anonymous writer denudes himself of his niqaab of Iblees and exposes his nifaaq. He disgorges ridiculous bunkum by trying to use the concession to fast whilst on a journey as proof that people MUST wear a mask in Salaah, asking the question: “Will a person not be answerable before Allah Ta’ala if he does not take the concession and something goes wrong?”
    The amount of jahaalat, blatant stupidity present in this one ridiculous paragraph alone is enough to strip the article of all Ilmi value and render it unfit for anything besides being chucked like a dirty rag into the writer's niqaab-wearing anonymous face. If the person had any shred ofIlm of
    Deen, he would not have written such trash. There are certain questions which are so ridiculously stupid that they do not deserve an answer. In fact, even to take out time to respond to such stupid questions is in itself a form of stupidity. It is the equivalent of responding to a fool who asks, “Who says the moon isn’t actually a ball of cheese?”
    This person should shut up and focus on studying Deen instead of blurting out rubbish. Each nonsensical article is even more stupid than the previous one, yet in his vermiculated mind he probably feels himself to be a great Mujtahid and Muhaddith, that perhaps he can start his own Madh-hab and we can do away with the four Madhaahib of Haqq and all follow this moron instead.
  8. It is difficult to even describe the amount of shivering cowardice present in the next part of his article. The male purdah-nasheen lady is so overwhelmed with fear of the kuffaar and even fear of his own shadow that he cites Salaat-ul-Khawf as proof for the new-fangled fong-kong “prayer” being done today! Allaahu Akbar! Is it possible for a person of sound Imaan to be filled with so much cowardice? Does he understand what Salaat-ul-Khawf is?
    Salaat-ul-Khawf is a form of Salaah made on the Battlefield, by Mujaahideen, in order to continue fighting the enemy. This Salaah was performed in the past when Mujaahideen were in the heat of the battle and the kuffaar were in their faces with swords and the battle was raging. You want to draw a parallel between that and a person sitting in a Masjid, him and a few others, in peace, no battle taking place, no shots being fired, no bombs being dropped overhead, and yet say Salaat-ul-Khawf applies to them? If you have so much fear while sitting in a Masjid with a handful of other Muslims, everything quiet, no fighting taking place, how in the world would you handle being on a battlefield?
    The Muslims have been taught a Duaa to get rid of cowardice. This person should read that Duaa. As it is, he is so terrified that he might faint just by seeing his own shadow.
    One `Aalim rightly said: “Many get cowardly in times like this. They don’t want to speak the truth. They don’t want to hear the truth. They don’t want to even practice the truth. Some are so terrified today they are even afraid to think the truth.” That is the condition of this anonymous writer.
  9. The male purdah-nasheen lady cloaked in anonymity avers: “…Based on these principles and after having consulted with many medical experts in the field who believe that covering the mouth/nose, as well as practicing social distancing will be useful in curbing the spread of the deadly virus, the Fuqaha have deemed this as a valid enough excuse for its implementation during Salah, and the Salah will be done with the full reward received.”
    He has written that section in bold.
    Firstly: due to your cowardice, you have misunderstood and misapplied every “principle” that you have quoted, so your averment is not “based on any principles”. It is simply based on being a coward overwhelmed with fear. More precisely, it is based on being overwhelmed with the “wahn” mentioned in the Hadeeth. Rasoolullaah صلى الله عليه وسلم stated that in the latter days, the reason for this Ummah being devoured by the kuffaar will be due to the wahn in their hearts. Sahaabah-e-Kiraam رضي الله عنهم enquired
    what this “wahn” is, so Rasoolullaah صلى الله عليه وسلم said that it is: “Love for the Dunyaa and fear of death.”
    Hubb-ud-Dunyaa wa Karaahiyatul Mawt
    Secondly: the “many medical experts” you refer to are Satanists who simply push the agenda fed to them by Shaitaan and the agents of Dajjaal. To them, whatever Islaam says is harmful and must be avoided. Only fools with no connection to Deen follow them. Other “medical experts in the field” have stated that the mask brings more harm than good, so which “medical experts” will be taken? Only those who promote and further the cause of Satanism and eradication of Islaam?
    Thirdly: who are these “Fuqaha” you speak of? There are no Fuqahaa and Mujtahideen alive today. Give us the names of these so-called “Fuqaha”.
    Today, people who have not even learnt how to perform istinjaa correctly have suddenly become “Fuqaha” and “Muhadditheen” who think they can change the Shareeah based on their own whims and desires and the whims and desires of the kuffaar whose boots they lick with relish. We conclude with just one, single point which neither he nor any of his fellow anonymous male purdah-nasheen ladies will be able to answer: “There were many plagues in the past. Show us where Sahaabah-e- Kiraam wore masks and did social-distancing, or where the Taabioon did so, or where the Atbaa-ut-Taabieen did so.”
    It is kufr to call for changing Salaah. Despite plagues in the past like the Black Plague which resulted in the deaths of more than 200 million people, never ever did the Fuqahaa call for changing the form of Salaah. Were they unaware of the “principles” cited by the anonymous writer? Does he and his so-called “medical experts” understand the Deen of Islaam better than Sahaabah-e-Kiraam did?
    His entire article is bereft of any `Ilmi value. The “proofs” he presents are no more than a smokescreen. Any reader who sincerely wishes to follow the Haqq will easily see through it. It is nothing more than the excuses presented by a coward who is desperately trying to justify his cowardice.
    والله تعالى أعلم وعلمه أتم وأحكم
  • Muhammad Huzaifah ibn Adam Aal-Ebrahim



Mufti Ebrahim Desai, in a fatwa, says that it is permissible to wear a covid mask. He says that the prohibition in the Hadith falls away when the mask is worn because of a need. The need is the danger of being infected with the covid disease. He quoted from several kitaabs of the Hanafi Fuqaha. One such quotation is:

“Covering one’s mouth in Salah is prohibited due to the Hadith of Abu Dawud and others. It will only be permissible to cover at the time of need.” (Emphasis not mine)

The mufti basis the permissibility on the need “to save oneself from being infected”. Is this fatwa valid?


This is one more of the zigzag fatwas for which the wayward mufti has a penchant. There is no valid Shar’i substance in his zigzag fatwa which is designed for bootlicking the atheists and the government. This miserable mufti is a sell-out. He has become a traitor to the Deen. He mis-manipulates the texts of the Shariah for sinister agendas. The current shaitaani objective is to accord Shar’i acceptability to the baatil covid shaitaaniyat dinned into his ears by anti-Islam forces.

The Hadith and the texts of the Fuqaha are abundantly clear. With clarity the prohibition is stated. The exception is an exigency of Dhuroorat (real need), not a hallucinated need, and not a need according to the kufr theories of the atheists.

No one denies the principle of Dhuroorat. But every imaginary ‘need’ does not come within the Shariah’s concept of Dhuroorat. If there is genuine Dhuroorat, Salaat may be performed wearing only a female’s panties or even stark naked. When there is legitimate Dhuroorat in the meaning of the Shariah’s concept, then liquor and pork may also be consumed, and for such consumption there is no need for the rubbish ‘halaal’ certificates of the Carrion & Pork cartel.

The conjectured or imagined ‘need’ on which the zigzagger basis his corrupt fatwa is underlined by the kufr contagion belief which is in blatant denial of the explicit La Adwaa proclamation of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). This miserable miscreant mufti shamelessly peddles the idea of the atheist in stark denial of the Law stated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

In view of the Shariah’s explicit negation of the kufr idea of contagion, there is absolutely no need to don the niqaab of Iblees in Salaat. Thus, the original Mas’alah remains in its place. The exception proffered by the miscreant has no basis. It is spurious and baatil, hence donning the niqaab of Iblees in Salaat is Haraam. The fear of infection is unfounded and kufr.

Furthermore, wearing the niqaab of Iblees in the current context of the circumstances is not only Makrooh, it is kufr, and it invalidates Salaat. Donning the Ibleesi niqaab is accompanied by the kufr belief of contagion. It is the kufr idea of the atheists which this miserable mufti is promoting.

The function of a true Mufti is to strengthen the bond with Allah Ta’ala, not to widen the existing chasm between the bandah and Allah Ta’ala. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Seek a fatwa from your heart.” The sincere searcher of the Truth should, with an unbiased mind, scrutinize the fatwa of this wayward mufti.

Who and what is this mufti promoting with his zigzag fatwa? The fatwa of the heart will adequately reply this question. Everyone can understand that the fatwa of permissibility for donning the niqaab of Iblees is designed to promote the theory of the atheists and to curry favour with the government. There is no Deeni objective for this confounded baatil fatwa.

He completely side steps the original purport of Rasulullah’s prohibition, and clings on to the straw of the exception on the fallacious basis of imaginary dhuroorat to peddle the wares of Bill Gates and his ilk.

The fatwa of Deoband is just as putrid as the fatwa of mufti Ebrahim Desai. Deoband is no longer a reliable institution. We scrutinize the fatwas emanating from today’s Darul Ifta if Deoband. The Janaazah of Ilm has long ago departed from Darul Uloom Deoband. Now there remains only a skeleton. Their fatwa also emphasizes on the exception instead of the prohibition stated with clarity by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

Both fatwas are bunkum. It is haraam to don the niqaab of Iblees. Salaat with the evil niqaab on, due to the kufr belief underlying it, is not valid.

22 Jamaadil Awwal 1442 – 6 January 2021



Peddling the bogus covid wares of his handlers in the Pakistani government, Taqi Uthmani with regard to the hallucinated ‘second wave’, said: “Practice on all the precautions with diligence. Hospitals are full.”

What are these ‘precautions’? And, for what are the ‘precautions’? Even for genuine and valid expediencies only precautions which are lawful in the Shariah may be adopted in general while men of Taqwa have the Shar’i right to abstain from even such valid and Islamically lawful protections. Once, Ameerul Mu’mineen Umar Bin Khattaab (Radhiyallahu anhu) was severely indisposed. A Sahaabi suggested that a hakeem should be called. Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) said: “If I know that the cure for my sickness is only in lifting my hand and placing it on my head, I would desist from it.” In dismissing the suggestion to resort to medical treatment, his lofty degree of Taqwa constrained the display of this attitude of Tawakkul and Ridha. He was pleased and contented with the Will of Allah Ta’ala.

Hadhrat Junaid Baghdaadi (Rahmatullah alayh) was suffering from a severe eye problem which threatened blindness. The hakeem / doctor who examined him advised that whilst he will be under treatment, he has to abstain from applying water to his eyes thereby implying abstention from Wudhu. Hadhrat Junaid (Rahmatullah alayh) said that he was prepared to accept blindness, but not abstention from wudhu despite Tayammum being permissible in the circumstances. Thus, he refused the hakeem’s treatment.

While we lack such lofty states of Taqwa and Tawakkul, it does not follow that we have to jettison our Imaan from our hearts by submitting to the kufr of the atheists and peddled by their agents such as Taqi Uthmani and other scholars for dollars of similar ilk.

The ‘precautions’ advised by the mudhil agent of the atheists refer to the haraam covid protocols structured on the haraam basis of the kufr theory of contagion which was explicitly and emphatically refuted by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) by word and deed. Aggravating the hurmat of the conditions is the bogey of the ‘second wave’. In fact there was not even a ‘first wave’. The whole mess is a Bill Gates trillion dollar conspiracy into which he has succeeded to rope in most of the moron government officials. Taqi Uthmani and the ulama-e-soo’ cartel are all members of Hizbush Shaitaan (The Legion of Iblees), hence they lick the boots and hinds of the western atheists most obsequiously, and they do so with relish in view of the chimera of the dollars dangling infront of them.


(1)The niqaab of Iblees: While Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) forbade that the face be covered during Salaat, Taqi Uthmani and the whole gamut of Hizbush Shaitaan insist on donning the niqaab of Iblees. They believing that by muzzling themselves so hideously, they will be able to thwart Allah’s decree. Even muzzled dogs present a better spectacle than those buffeted by fear into these satanic protocols of the atheists.

The Sahaabah would sharply jerk off any face-covering from the face of a musalli. Covering the face during Salaat for any reason other than the kufr theory, is haraam. But donning the hideous niqaab of Iblees on the basis of the kufr contagion theory of the atheists is kufr. It is for this reason that Salaat behind a moron imam donning the niqaab of Iblees is not valid.

Regarding the niqaab of the devil, the moron mufti asks: “What Hardship is there in wearing a mask?” We say that you, Taqi Uthmani, are either too stupid to understand the hardship involved in donning the niqaab of Iblees, or you are deliberately pretending to be oblivious of the hardship in obedience to your handlers.

Firstly, it is haraam to don the niqaab of Iblees during Salaat. Secondly, the rationale underlying the niqaab of Iblees is kufr. Thirdly, it is an imposition of corrupt, brutal mafia gangster personnel. Fourthly, it is in violation of Allah’s natural law of exhaling filth from the body. Allah Ta’ala has ordained that filthy air and menstrual blood be expelled from the body. Besides the kufr factor, inhaling and retention of filthy air and putrefied haidh blood bring in their wake diseases which have extremely harmful health consequences in the long term. While filthy air has to be incumbently expelled from the body, the devil’s niqaab constrains the diffusion of the filth into the body. All things unnatural have harmful consequences.

Fifthly, the physical discomfort caused by covering the face, especially on hot days, is a cruel hardship imposed by governments in league with Bill Gates.

The Devils’ social-distancing

Many Ahaadith explicitly inform us that the gaps between musallis in the Salaat sufoof are occupied by the shayaateen (devils). Thus, there will be a preponderance of devils in all the Musjids converted into weird temples where the satanic protocol of ‘social-distancing’ is observed. It is therefore not permissible to join a mixed congregation of humans and devils. Perform Salaat at home if a valid Jamaat is not available.

Besides the factor of devils filling the gaps, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) also mentioned that the effect of the gaps in the saff is disunity in the hearts. It causes enmity and disunity among Muslims.

The number restriction

It is haraam to debar any Muslim from entering the Musjid for Salaat. Yet, this miserable bootlicking mufti supports the protocol of the atheists limiting the number of musallis. When the protocoled number is reached, musallis are debarred entry. While this satanic restriction is haraam for all Salaat, it negates the validity of Jumuah Salaat. According to the Hanafi Math-hab, Jumuah is invalid on the basis of two evil factors: (a) The condition of Ithnul Aam is violated. (b) It is a condition structured on the basis of kufr.

Taqi Uthmani and the rest of Hizbush Shaitaan come fully within the glare of the Qur’aanic Aayat: Who is a greater zaalim than the one who prevents the Thikr of Allah’s Name from the Musaajid of Allah, and who strives to ruin the Musaajid?”

Besides the aforementioned three devilish haraam ‘precautions’ presented to Taqi Uthmani by his kuffaar handlers, there are several other haraam/kufr conditions which have been explained in many of our articles on this topic. These are available on our website.


The claim by Taqi Uthmani, viz, ‘hospitals are full’, i.e. full of covid victims, is a blatant, satanic lie. This misinformation has been fed to him by his handlers. Either Taqi is aware of the falsity of this claim or he is too dim in the brains to understand and to ascertain the misinformation which has been disgorged into his mouth. A Brother from Karachi, Pakistan, commenting on the rubbish excreted by Taqi Uthmani writes:

“Last night my uncle let me listen to mufti Taqi’s recent audio on corona. Thereafter we called a hospital. We ascertained that they were not filled as mentioned by mufti Taqi in his speech. I have ascertained from other hospitals as well and have realized the gross amount of exaggeration by him.”

Many people from U.K. and other countries have informed us of similar blatantly false claims of hospitals overrun with corona patients.

Rasulullah’s Warning for Muslims

Hadhrat Abu Tharr (Radhiyallahu anhu) narrates: “Once I was walking with Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), and he said: ‘Besides Dajjaal something is more fearful for my Ummah.” He mentioned this statement thrice. I (Abu Tharr) said: “O Rasulullah! What is this which causes you greater fear for your Ummah than even Dajjaal?” Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: ‘Aimmah Mudhilleen!”

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had a greater fear for the Aimmah Mudhilleen than for even Dajjaal. The gravest danger for the Ummah is the Aimmah Mudhilleen. They are the scholars for dollars –the ulama-e-soo’ – who misguide and mislead the Ummah with their corrupt, baatil, zigzag fatwas. And, they do so for worldly, monetary, mercenary and nafsaani objectives.

6 Jamaadil Awwal 1442 – 21 December 2020



When a molvi’s brains are convoluted by shaitaan, then in the words of the Qur’aan Majeed, he blunders with shaitaani intoxication. In this regard, the Qur’aan Majeed states:

“Those who devour riba do not stand except as one who has been afflicted by the touch of shaitaan stands. That is because they say that trade is like riba whilst Allah has made halaal trade and made haraam riba.”

Although the specific circumstance for the revelation of this Aayat is the prohibition of riba, it has a general application. Those who halaalize any of Allah’s prohibitions come within the scope of this Qur’aanic stricture.

The niqaab of Iblees, i.e. the covid mask designed, advised and forced by the atheists and the enemies of Allah Ta’ala, is haraam. Even a face covering not designed by the kuffaar and not accompanied by the kufr contagious belief, and not donned to bootlick the kuffaar, is haraam to wear during Salaat. That is, a man may not cover his face with any cloth or garment whilst performing Salaat. There is specific Nass on this prohibition.

The UK molvi, most ludicrously, stupidly and satanically elevates the haraam niqaab of Iblees to the stature of Sunnah. He disgorges the follow kufr effluvium:

“The blessed Sunnah of the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wasallam was that whenever he would wear something (clothes, shoes etc) he would start from the right. And when he would remove something he would remove the left side first.

For example when he sallallahu alayhi wasallam would wear footwear he would wear the right first and then the left. And when removing he would remove the left first and then the right.

Yesterday our respected Shaykh, Mawlana Muhammad Saleem Dhorat Saheb hafizahullah mentioned nowadays we are constantly a wearing the face mask. When wearing the mask we should tie the rightstrap first (behind the ear) and then the left. And when removing the mask we should remove the left strap first thereafter the right strap and whilst doing this a person should make the intention of acting upon the blessed sunnah. We are wearing and removing the mask multiple times in a day. Like this imagine how much reward we can reap in one day.”

(End of the molvi’s kufr rubbish)

“Like this”, those who don the niqaab of Iblees should imagine how much Wrath and La’nat of Allah Ta’ala settle on them in one day. The molvi has gone haywire with his kufr. Shaitaan has indeed “driven him to madness with his touch” as is mentioned in the aforementioned Qur’aanic Aayat.  Satanism has blinded the eyes of his heart. He has sunk deep into the gutter of kufr by promoting the niqaab of Iblees and by elevating it to the status of Sunnah.

Imaam As-Sarakhsi (Rahmatullah alayh) says:

[مَكْرُوهَات الصَّلَاة]
قَالَ: (وَيُكْرَهُ فِي الصَّلَاةِ تَغْطِيَةُ الْفَمِ) لِحَدِيثِ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ – رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ – أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ – صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ -: «نَهَى أَنْ يُغَطِّيَ الْمُصَلِّي فَاهُ» ، وَلِأَنَّهُ إنْ غَطَّاهُ بِيَدِهِ فَقَدْ قَالَ كُفُّوا أَيْدِيَكُمْ فِي الصَّلَاةِ، وَإِنْ غَطَّاهُ بِثَوْبٍ فَقَدْ نَهَى عَنْ التَّلَثُّمِ فِي الصَّلَاةِ، وَفِيهِ تَشَبُّهٌ بِالْمَجُوسِ فِي عِبَادَتِهِمْ النَّارَ.

It is prohibited (Makrooh Tahrimi) to cover the face during Salaat because of the Hadith of Abu Hurairah (Radhiyallahu anhu): ‘Verily Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) forbade that the musalli covers his face…….

He prohibited talath-thum in Salaat. (Talath-thum: i.e. covering the face with a veil), and in it tashabbuh (emulation) of the Majoos during their worshipping the fire.”

The mushrik Majoos (Fire-Worshippers) don the niqaab of Iblees when they worship the fire. Today molvis are promoting this face-covering of the devil and even elevating it to the status of the Sunnah during Salaat. The molvi’s rubbish kufr advice is in stark conflict and denial of the prohibition proclaimed by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

“Imaam Maalik (Rahmatullah alayh) narrates from Abdur Rahmaan Bin Al-Mujeer that he saw Saalim Bin Abdullah who would forcefully rip off the cloth (the veil/face-covering) from the face of a person performing Salaat.”

Arabic 1

“Imaam Abu Hanifah (Rahmatullah alayh) narrated that Ibraahim (Nakh’i) regarded as Makrooh that a man covers his face in Salaat, and he (also) regarded as Makrooh that a woman performs Salaat with a face covered with niqaab.”

Arabic 2

“Ibraaheem Nakh’i said: It is Makrroh that he (the musalli) covers his face. Imaam Muhammad said: ‘This is our view. We also regard as Makrooh that he covers his nose. And this is the view of Abu Hanifah (Rahmatullah alayh).

Arabic 3

The molvi’s advice is clearly kufr. He has implied by his satanic advice his rejection of the prohibition stated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). This rejection is tantamount to kufr.

“Salaam on those who follow the huda  of Allah”


The advice given by this molvi has been satanically calculated to convey the absolutely baatil idea of the niqaab of Iblees being permissible, hence the aadaab pertaining to other permissible acts should be extended to this haraam act as well. This stupid haraam advice is similar to saying that when eating pork or carrion one should commence with Bismillaah and eat with the right hand. It is similar to advising men to bestow the Masnoon Aadaab of dressing even if they clothe themselves with female garments or the type of garments which are the styles of immoral fussaaq and fujjaar. The elevation of a kufr act to the level of Sunnah is itself kufr.

Download full article with Arabic

1 Jamaadil Awwal 1442 – 16 December 2020