COVID Fraud – Lawyers & Medical Experts start legal proceedings against W.H.O

COVID Fraud – Lawyers & Medical Experts start legal proceedings against W.H.O and World Leaders for ‘Crimes against Humanity’

By The Daily Expose on May 7, 2021 • ( 198 Comments )

A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.

Fuellmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death as fraud. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases / ”infections” tracked by the use of this faulty test.

In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention.

The “experimental” vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws.

The “vaccine” fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine and is by definition a medical “experiment” and trial:

Provides immunity to the virus
This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims to reduce symptoms yet double-vaccinated are now 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU with covid infections.

Protects recipients from getting the virus
This gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus.

Reduces deaths from the virus infection
This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-Vaccinated infected with Covid have also died.

Reduces circulation of the virus

This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.

Reduces transmission of the virus

This gene-therapy still permits the transmission of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.

9 Zul-Hajj 1442 – 20 July 2021





England ends lockdown: No facemasks, no distancing

05 July 2021 – 19:04 By Reuters

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson set out plans on Monday for the final step in easing England’s Covid-19 lockdown, including the removal of laws governing social distancing and face coverings, and an end to official advice to work from home.

Johnson said he expected the lifting of restrictions to go ahead on July 19. He said a final decision would be announced on July 12. Some elements, including education and travel policy, will be announced later this week.

Here’s the plan:

FACEMASKS – Regulations mandating facemasks will be lifted. The government will continue to recommend certain circumstances where they may be worn, but this will be a personal choice.

Transport providers can still choose to insist on masks, if they decide to.

SOCIAL DISTANCING – There will be no limits on how many people can meet socially, or where they can meet. This applies to weddings, funerals and other life events. It also includes care homes, although enhanced infection control measures will apply.

There will be no further rules dictating people maintain at least one metre apart.

HOSPITALITY – There will be no limits on capacity at hospitality venues, or a requirement to provide table service. Nightclubs and other businesses previously subject to forced closure, will now be able to open.

TRAVEL – The government will work with the transport industry to allow fully-vaccinated individuals to return from amber-list countries without quarantining.

LARGE EVENTS – There will be no restrictions on the number of people who can attend large events like sports matches and concerts.

VACCINATION – To speed up the vaccine rollout, the dosing interval for those aged under 40 will be reduced to 8 weeks from 12 weeks.

WORK FROM HOME – People will no longer be instructed to work from home. It will be up to individual employers to decide the pace of employees’ return.

The government will ditch rules for employers on how to make their premises ‘COVID secure’, replacing it with a lighter touch set of guidelines.

TESTING – The government’s testing system for those with COVID-19 symptoms will continue. Free asymptomatic testing will be available until September.

SELF ISOLATING – It will still be a legal requirement to self isolate after testing positive for COVID-19 or when instructed to by the government’s test and trace system.

However, the government intends to exempt those who have had two vaccine doses from the need to self isolate if they have been identified as a contact of someone with COVID.

SELF CERTIFICATION – The government has decided not to pursue a legally-enforced system of COVID status certification.

25 Zul-Qa’dh 1442 – 6 July 2021




Those Muslims, especially molvis and muftis who have committed the zulm of negating the Laa Adwaa (There is no contagion) declaration of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) – the zulm of advocating closure of the Musaajid – the zulm of suspending Jumua Salaat – the zulm of banning Jamaat Salaat – the zulm of believing in the efficacy and goodness of the Niqaab of Iblees (the shaitaani mask) – the zulm of observing shaitaani distancing, and the zulm of supporting the theories and protocols of the atheists – all such Muslims MUST resort to Taubah.

Allah’s Athaab is severe. When his Whip strikes, then it will be too late for Taubah, and too late to regret. The very Athaab (the covid satanism) which these molvis and muftis believe can be combated and thwarted by observing the protocols of the atheists will hem them in. Maut which these molvis and muftis believe can be foiled with the implements of Iblees – the protocols of the atheists – will apprehend them at the appointed time. Flight from Maut and Allah’s Taqdeer is not possible.

Understand well that it is KUFR to reject the declaration of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). No amount and no kind of interpretation can justify the rejection by the miscreant muftis of this era. These muftis, molvis and sheikhs have become agents of Iblees and agents of the government. Thus, instead of being the Defenders of the Shariah, they find themselves in the camp of the atheists and defending and propagating the haraam theories and protocols of the enemies of Allah Ta’ala.

One by one Allah Ta’ala will apprehend them with the very Athaab (the covid satanism) which they seek to escape by way of rejecting the Shariah and adopting the excreta of the atheists. Nothing will save them. Hasten to Taubah. Renew your Imaan and make Dua.

24 Zul-Qa’dh 1442 – 5 July 2021


Shariah on Vaccines
 Note: The following is a publicly endorsed declaration by Mufti Ahmad Sadiq Desai and his body of Ulema at Majlisul Ulama of South Africa and other esteemed Ulema. If other Muslim leaders, Imams or Ulema would like to add their public endorsement of the declaration below then contact us by clicking HERE. For additional declarations from other Ulema see by clicking HERE. For a current list of public signatories see by clicking HERE.

Urdu version of the declaration below now available click HERE

Electronic Poster for the declaration below click HERE

Printable Poster for the declaration below click HERE
                                                                                                  DECLARATION ON VACCINES:
Timely Reminder of the Shariah on Vaccines

The Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Allah has not placed a cure for your diseases in things that He has forbidden for you.” (Baihaqi, Bukhari). And Allah has forbidden constituents that are inextricably harmful as the Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam also said: “There (must be) no harm and no harming.” (Ibn Majah). And hence ‘vaccinations’ as we know them (including the current globally propagated COVID-19 vaccines) are not permissible by the Creator as vaccines contain proven harmful components such as:
bacteria, aborted fetal tissue, cells and blood from animals, harmful chemicals and neurotoxins such as formaldehyde, phenoxyethanol, mercury, aluminum and others.Vaccines can cause serious health problems, including permanent injuries and death.*
Do not kill yourselves, indeed God is the Most Merciful upon you.” (Qurʾan: 4:29)
Do not throw yourselves into destruction with your own hands. Do good, for God certainly loves those who do good.” (Qurʾan: 2:195)
Rather than being a treatment for the sick human body, vaccination introduces, in most cases, cancerous and neurotoxic substances. In other words, clearly harmful contents are administered into a healthy body. No case in the acquittal of the clear harmful outcomes of vaccination will have any legitimacy as long as the exponents of ‘vaccination’ fail to rationally respond to the solid medical findings of injurious effects, including permanent injuries and deaths caused by this particular intervention of ‘vaccines’ as known today.
After acquainting oneself with the overwhelming evidence of the clear harm and thus haraam of “vaccines” of the current criminal capitalistic drug manufacturing establishments a true Muslim will never believe that Shifa (healing) is contained in this concoction of neurotoxins and poisons, and, would never forget the irrefutable fact that Allah has not ordained the Shifa of His Ummah in the defiled – in najaasat – and substances which He has made harmful.
If one just takes a look behind the sophisticated veneer of the pharmaceutical industries’ propaganda the published proofs by medical experts conclusively proving the irreparable damage that vaccines cause to the human being are insurmountable. This makes more than clear the impermissibility to inject najaasat into our Allah entrusted bodies. Note it is by clear default according to the plain nass of the Shariah that “vaccines” as currently known are Haraam and thus Muslims will be held accountable by the Creator of consenting to this najaas intaking/injecting brew. For a Muslim supporter of vaccines the onus is on him/her to present an evidenced “fatwa” to make this obvious haraam concoction of vaccination as permissible – this task would be a tenuous one to say the least especially after being apprised of the overwhelming evidence of the clear harm and danger of ‘vaccinations’ since its inception from the late 18th century. Hence it is Waajib to abstain from the rijs (filth) of ‘vaccines’ just like it is obviously Wajib in Islam to abstain from taking/inserting a known poison into a healthy body.
He makes lawful to them what is good and pure and prohibits them what is foul and impure.” (Qur’an 7:157)

*For References & Resources on the Inextricable Harm/Haraam of “Vaccines” click HERE.

The Ummah Times conversation with Mufti Ahmad Sadiq Desai on the COVID-19 Crisis and the state of the Ummah

The Ummah Times
March 23, 2021

Following is the transcript of the recent Ummah Times conversation with the esteemed Mufti Ahmad Sadiq Desai who heads the body of the Ulema organization of Majlisul Ulama ( in South Africa. Among the topics covered were the status of the newly instituted ‘distanced salaat’ in Masjids, Islamic legal status of vaccines and the current COVID-19 restrictions on the Hajj.

Ummah Times: What are some of the pragmatic steps Muslims can take to overcome the misinformation regarding the vaccinations in general but more specifically Covid-19 inoculation?

Mufti A.S. Desai: Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Majeed:
“It is not lawful for a Mu’min nor for a Mu’minah to have any choice whatsoever
in any of their affairs when Allah and His Rasool have decided (given a verdict).”
(Al-Ahzaab, Aayat 36)

“Then have We established you on a Shariah regarding matters. Therefore follow it (the Shariah), and do not follow the vain desires of those who do not know.”
(Al-Jaathiyah, Aayat 18)

For Muslims there is no pragmatism without the Shariah. Every issue, development or expedient must be incumbently viewed in the light of the Shariah. Muslims should in entirety ignore the misinformation which the mainstream press and governments subservient to the Bill Gates cartel disseminate. If Muslims view in the light of the Shariah the claims and theories pertaining to the covid nonsense, they will then have no difficulty in understanding that something massively sinister is underlying this bogus pandemic.

The primary problem is that the bootlicking molvies and sheikhs are keeping the masses in the darkness of ignorance. If the Ulama educate the masses and keep them informed of the reaction and action of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and of his Sahaabah during epidemics, then there will be no confusion among Muslims.
They will then understand that in terms of Islam, there are only two reasons for an epidemic and which were explicitly stated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), viz. it is either an Athaab or Shahaadat. There is no third objective for an epidemic.

However, since the masses have been brainwashed by the Ulama-e-Soo’ who peddle the wares of the Bill Gates-Pharma cartel, there is really no hope in them being extricated from the cesspool of misinformation and inequity in which Muslims are today floundering. The colossal ignorance of the masses is being exploited by evil ulama who have pernicious motives, and this combination of gross ignorance and ulama villainy precludes the eradication of misinformation. They will simply continue with their deglutition of misinformation and falsehood. There is nothing dehortative in the sermons of the evil ulama to assist Muslims in understanding the reality of the fraud and misinformation which is being fed to the world by a satanic clique.

Ummah Times: What is your view on the so-called social distancing Salat that’s been implemented in the Masaajid globally during this global lockdown? Can it carry any Islamic basis?

Mufti A.S. Desai: Far, very far from there being any basis in Islam for devil’s distancing (so-called social distancing), the very opposite was emphasized by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). We have elucidated on this issue in several articles which are available on our website. In brief, Rasulullah (Sallaallau alayhi wasallam) had:

(a) Prohibited the slightest gaps between musallis in the saff.
(b) Warned that the gaps are filled by shayaateen
(c) Said that distance between musallis cultivates mutual enmity in the hearts of
(d) Said that distance between musallis will disunite Muslims.
(e) Commanded shoulder to shoulder standing in the saff.

Furthermore, numerous plagues and epidemics had ravaged the Lands of Islam. But never was devil’s distance introduced in any of the Musaajid. Epidemics and plagues are not new developments in the Ummah. These creations of Allah Ta’ala existed from time immemorial. It is inconceivable for there not to be any clear directive in the Shariah on an issue with which Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was directly involved in. Thus, ‘social distancing’ is in terms of the Hadith devil’s distancing. The distances (gaps) are filled with shayaateen according to our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

Ummah Times: We understand that your organization of esteemed Ulema have reminded and
declared to fellow Muslims of the Haraam nature of the vaccinations currently known, however it seems many, if not most, Muslim leaders and Imams have bought the WHO global vaccine push. Are you also attempting to help educate and convince other Muslim leaders and Imams concerning the impermissibility of ‘vaccines’? And if so how successful has it been?

Mufti A.S. Desai: Muslim leaders and Imaams who are urging Muslims to submit to the satanic plot of vaccination cannot be educated or convinced. They will perish in their evil. Only those who are sincere, but misled by misinformation and false propaganda by the evil molvis and sheikhs can be convinced of the egregious and heinous villainy of the vaccination programme.

There were many sincere Ulama who were misled by so-called ‘grand muftis and senior ulama who are all lackeys of governments who are part of the Bill Gates Cartel of conspirators. The dollars have purchased their allegiance. Alhamdulillah, after studying our literature their eyes opened up and they understood the reality of the satanism of vaccination*. Many have written to us on this issue. However, it should be understood that we are moving towards Qiyaamah. The tide of evil will necessarily gain momentum and the stage for Dajjaal is being prepared. Therefore the vast majority will remain trapped in evil and falsehood. This has been predicted by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

Our obligation, like the obligation of the Ambiya (Alayhimus salaam), is to only deliver the Message of Truth regardless of who accepts and who rejects. Hidaayat (Guidance) is the prerogative of Allah Ta’ala. Only those whom He wills to be guided will see the light. The vast majority will remain trapped in darkness.

Ummah Times: Now that the Saudi regime has made the Covid-19 vaccination mandatory for the pilgrimages, how do you foresee the adaptability factor increasing even amongst the “unruly” Muslims who are resisting the inoculation propaganda?

Mufti A.S. Desai: The situation in Saudi Arabia where currently a kuffaar government holds sway is unpredictable. Anything can happen overnight to eliminate the precarious and current evil kuffaar rulers, or to plunge the country into internecine warfare without there being a viable government. The Libyan and Syrian scenarios could be repeated in Saudi Arabia.

It is our belief that currently it is not permissible to go for Hajj and Umrah. Musjidul Haraam has been transformed into a weird temple by the evil Saudis. The entire environment and atmosphere in even the Holy Cities are violently in conflict with the Shariah. Sincere Muslims can never adapt to the evil and haraam which the Saudi American bootlickers have perpetrated by de-sanctifying the Holy Land and all the Musaajid.

Those who resist the haraam vaccination programme will be thrown into dungeons in Saudi Arabia. We can only supplicate to Allah Ta’ala to reform the evil Muslim population of Saudi Arabia and to remove the kuffaar rulers who are masquerading as Muslims.

Ummah Times: Do you believe that the only viable option for the Ummah to escape the oppression and calamites is to revive Islamic Way of Life through the Polity structure of Khilafa? If so, what methodology needs to be adopted? If not, what do you propose we can do get our dignity back?

Mufti A.S. Desai: We believe that a true, valid and viable Khilaafah is a vain, distant pipedream as long as the Ummah on the ground remains sinking in the quagmire of moral degeneration which it has prepared for itself by having abandoned the Sunnah.

We need to adopt the Sunnah methodology which is the one and only way in which to regain our dignity and a semblance of our former Pedestal- i.e. the Pedestal occupied by the Sahaabah. Even for this objective there is the Sunnah pattern to follow. In the first 13 years of the mission of Nubuwwat, i.e. during ther Makki era, the emphasis was only purification of Aqeedah (Belief), Islaah of the Nafs (Moral Reformation) and Salaat. Besides this, nothing else. The Sahaabah were proscribed by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) from even mentioning Jihad.

This Sunnah clearly indicates that minus moral reformation which is possible only by adherence to the Original Sunnah, there will be no success, no respect and no dignity for Muslims. The Ummah today is light years away from moral reformation which is vital for Muslim success and victory over the kuffaar. But Muslims are not poised to understand this reality. Since the brains of Muslims are colonized by the western kuffaar, they are totally blind and fail to understand that our victory is reliant on the Shariah, not on emulating the Yahood and Nasaara whom Muslims, especially the evil ulama of today, are insanely bootlicking. Allah Ta’ala states in the Qur’aan Majeed:

“If you help (the Deen of) Allah, He will aid you and plant your feet Firmly (against your enemies).”





In his latest moronic, kufr, bootlicking fatwa, the maajin mufti Ebrahim Desai, promoting the theme of the atheists, and peddling their satanic wares, says:

“If a person is tested Covid positive, he should take full precaution and avoid going to the Musjid until Covid 19 symptoms are clear.”

He abortively attempts to justify this SAREEH (Explicit) kufr with a Hadith which he stupidly misinterprets and which has absolutelyno relevance to the issue which he seeks to promote on behalf of the kuffaar proponents of the contagion baatil and fussaaq, munaafiq, murtad ‘muslim’ doctors who are promoting the kufr covid protocols more zealously than even their atheist handlers who have fitted their brains into kufr straitjackets.

Prohibiting a Muslim from participating in Jamaat Salaat is sareeh kufr notwithstanding the Muslim being afflicted with any type of sickness. When Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was overwhelmed with severe fever, he would lean on the shoulders of two Sahaabah who would literally drag our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to the Musjid. And, this was the Sunnah adopted by ailing Sahaabah. But here we find moron maajin muftis peddling and promoting the theories and protocols of the atheists banning Muslims from the Musjid.


In 2014, this selfsame mufti who has now slipped into the dregs of dhalaal and kufr, propounded the exact opposite of what he is disgorging today. The following is his fatwa issue in September 2014 when there was no covid agenda to promote.

“The plague of Amwaas

In the Name of Allah. The Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

The plague of Amwaas took piece in the 18th year alter Hijrah (about 639AD),during the caliphate of Umar {Radhiallahu Anhu] The plague occurred in the town of Amwaas, Palestine, somewhere close to Bait al Muqaddas.

A large number of people, estimated 30.000 died in this plague. Amongst them were many Sahahah. Some of the Sahabah that died in the plague of Amwaas are: Abu Ubaidah, Mu’aadh ibn Jabal, Yazeed bin Abi Sufyaan, Suhail bin ‘Amr (Radhiallahu Anhum).

The following Hadith mentions the plague of Anwaas and the lmaan and Yaqeen in which the Sahabah met it with.


It was narrated from Shahr bin Hawshab al-Ash’ari, from Rabbih, a man from among his people who married Shahr’s mother after his father died, that he witnessed the plague of Amwas. He said: When the epidemic grew severe, Abu ‘Ubaidah bin al-Jarrah [Radhiallahu Anhu) stood up to address the people and said: O people, this epidemic is a mercy from your Lord and the answer to the prayer of your Prophet and this is how the righteous before you died. Abu ‘Ubaidah is asking Allah to give him his share of it. Then he got the plague and died, may Allah have mercy on him. Mu’adh bin Jabal [Radhiallahu Anhu] succeeded him as the people’s leader and stood up to address them after he died. He said. ‘O people, this epidemic is a mercy from your Lord and the answer to the prayer of your Prophet an , this is how the righteous before you died. Mu’adh is asking Allah to grant a share of it to the family of Mu’adh.

Then his son ‘Abdur Rahman bin Muadh got the plague and died. Then he asked his Lord for his own share of it, and [symptoms of the plague] appeared on his hand. l saw him looking at it then he turned hand over, then he said o his hand: l would not like to have anything in this world in return for what you have got. When he died, ‘Amr bin al-‘As succeeded him as the people’s leader. (Ahmad 1697)

And Allah Ta’aala Knows Best

Arshed Ali

Student Darul lftaa, Trinidad

Checked and Approved by Mufti Ebrahim Desai.

(End of the fatwa issued in 2014)

In 2014 he maintained that the stance of the Sahaabah who supplicated to become victims of the plague and who had glowingly spoken of the Plague Rahmat had displayed “Imaan and Yaqeen”. Thus he said:

“The Hadith mentions the plague of Amwaas and the Imaan and Yaqeen in which the Sahabah met it with.”

In 2014, he held that the manner in which the Sahaabah had met the plague was of the demands of “Imaan and Yaqeen”.But today this most unfortunate miscreant who has slipped gravely from Siraatul Mustaqeem, and who is promoting pure kufr which he has acquired from the atheists via the munaafiq murtad doctors, deems it haraam to adopt the Sunnah of the Sahaabah and to meet the plague with the Imaan and Yaqeen demonstrated by the Sahaabah.

Notwithstanding all his stupidity and bootlicking, he cannot be ignorant of the fact, that Hadhrat Abu Ubaidah (Radhiyallahu anhu) and Hadhrat Muaaz Bin Jabal (Radhiyallahu) anhu, had delivered their final khutbahs inside the Musjid to the crowds of Muslims among who were numerous Sahaabah. No one was prevented from the Musjid on account of the plague.

Both these senior Sahaabah described the plague glowingly, saying: “O People! This epidemic is a mercy from your Rabb, and the answer to the prayer of your Nabi, and the Maut of the Saaliheen before you.”

Then Hadhrat Muaaz (Radhiyallahu anhu) supplicated to Allah Ta’ala: “Muaaz is supplicating for a share (of the plague) for the family of Muaaz.”

Soon thereafter, his son Abdur Rahmaan contracted the plague, and died. Then Hadhrat Muaaz stood up and supplicated for a share of the plague for himself. Then he was afflicted with the plague. Seeing the symptoms of the plague on his hand, he said, looking at his hand: “Nothing is more beloved to me than that (i.e. the plague) which you have.” He too attained Shahaadat in the Plague.

Discarding this wonderful Sunnah, the mufti maajin is advocating the protocols of the atheists, which require the closure of the Musaajid, abrogation of Jamaat Salaat and prohibiting Muslims from attending the Musaajid, and more kufr.

His flaccid and flapdoodle arguments

Stupidly arguing in support of preventing sick Muslims or even healthy Muslims from the Musjid on the ridiculous basis of ‘covid symptoms’ which the atheists say are a light cough or sneezing, the ZigZag mufti cites the garlic hadith. Presenting his stupid interpretation, he says:

“If a person is tested Covid19 positive, he should take full precaution and avoid going to the Musjid until the Covid 19 symptoms are clear i. Hereunder are a few relevant points cited in the references:

• Rasulullah صلىاللهعليهوسلم has clearly prohibited the one who has eaten anything which has a foul smell from entering the Masjid and joining the Jamaat Salaah. The reason for this prohibition mentioned in the Hadith is the inconvenience caused to the Malaikah and fellow Musallis.”

This is a rubbish, flaccid, flapdoodle satanically designed ‘daleel’ to promote the kufr protocols of the atheists. There is absolutely no grounds in the ‘foul smelling’ factor to justify prohibition on the basis of illness or a cough or a sneeze. It is necessary to present a solid daleel, not a stupid inference for preventing Muslims from the Musjid.

Why did Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah not prevent Musallis from the Musjid during plagues? Despite Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) speaking negatively about the stench of garlic, neither he nor the Sahaabah prevented sick persons from attending the Musjid. They did not use the stupid garlic inference excreted by the Zigzag mufti. The Sunnah of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) during a plague is daleel, not the stench of garlic. The fact that no one was prevented from the Musjid on account of the plague is a vehement rejection of the rubbish which the zigzag maajin mufti has disgorged to appease his atheist handlers.

If the stench of garlic had been valid premise for inference, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah would have been the very first to have prohibited the plague-affected Muslims from attending the Musjid. But the factual reality is that during plagues the Sahaabah and the Muslims in general flocked in greater numbers to the Musaajid and remained in I’tikaaf for longer periods imploring the mercy of Allah Azza Wa Jal, while those of the loftiest degree of Imaan and yaqeen supplicated for Maut with the plague in order to gain the status of shahaadat.

It is indeed explicit kufr to prevent people from the Musjid because of a cough/sneeze and to promote the kufr protocols of the atheists and to utilize this satanism as valid grounds for preventing Muslims from the Musjid.

These zigzag muftis are maintaining an ominous and a deafening silence regarding the Sunnah observed by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah during plagues, and about the categorical Qur’aanic prohibition pertaining to satanic quarantine and fleeing from the plague in fear of Maut.

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “He who flees from the plague is like one who flees from the battlefield, and he who remains steadfast (with Sabr) during the plague, for him is the reward of a Shaeed.”

On this very basis, we can say that he who prevents Muslims from the Musjid because of a cough or a sneeze or because the kuffaar diagnosed someone to be ‘covid positive’, is indeed a kaafir. In this context all the doctors of these munaafiq so-called ‘islamic’ associations come fully within the purview of ‘kuffaar’. They are worst kuffaar than asli (born) kuffaar.

The ‘inconvenience’ of a coughing or sneezing Musalli is the effect of brainwashing by the atheists. Why did Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah not consider the sickness acquired from the plague to be a sufficient factor of inconvenience for preventing musallis from the Musjid? There is no need for extending the garlic-stench prohibition to sickness and the plague when Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah had not done so. The qiyaas of the zigzag mufti – his inference based on stench – is stupid and utterly baseless, and the best daleel for this stupidity is the Sunnah of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

There is no need for inferences and extension of rulings when there exists explicit Sunnah practice on an issue. The Sunnah may not be scuttled and cancelled because of inferences based on the theories of the atheists.

The ‘leprosy’ argument is also stupid and utterly baseless. Despite the presence of lepers, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah did not prohibit the saick Sahaabah from the Musjid during plagues. It is pure satanism to attempt to abrogate the Sunnah on the basis of the leprosy narration because Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah did not ban people suffering from the plague from attending the Musjid.

There is not a single narration which reports that any Muslim was debarred from the Musjid on account of the plague. On the contrary, the majority of the Sahaabah in the Musjid were affected by the plague in Madinah during the time of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), but they all attended the Musjid.

The examples proffered by the zigzag mufti in support of preventing ‘covid affected’ musallis from the Musjid all pertain to garlic-stench. On the basis of this narration whoever emits a foul stench for whatever reason may be prevented from the Musjid. But it is not proper and not valid to extend the garlic narration to plague-affected persons for the simple reason that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah had not prevented such persons from the Musjid.

There is not a single Fiqhi narration adduced by the zigzag mufti which relates to the plague and to persons afflicted by the plague. His only inference to bolster his corrupt fatwa is the ‘garlic’ factor. However, not a single Faqih has utilized this narration as a basis for prohibiting people from the Musjid during a plague. The fatwa of the zigzag mufti is corrupt and baatil.

17 Zul-Qa’dh 1442 – 28 June 2021

COVID How To Overcome And Neutralize


How To Overcome And Neutralize The Satanic Plot

How to Prevent /cure Covid19 in 3 steps?

Step 1 (Prevention)

Cellular background Immunity: Upto 60% of the population have cellular background immunity to  novel corona virus as they have been infected with the previous corona viruses (cold virus) since childhood .

Here is the evidence :

Herd Immunity : Since 60% of the population is already having background immunity, rest 40% may get covered partially under herd immunity.Because of the above fact global case fatality ratio is 0.1% i.e equal to seasonal flu.

Here is the Evidence :

Mucosal Immunity : Everyday consume atleast 0.2gm of vitamin C from fruits (3 mangoes, 2 oranges or 1 guava) ro vegetables ( 4 tomatoes or one handful peas) to prevent respiratory viruses attack.

Here is the evidence:

Step 2 :

With the first symptom of flu (fever, cough, body ache, weakness) follow 3 Days Flu Diet. To learn the 3 days Flu diet go to :

The 3 Day Flu diet works and here is the evidence:

Step 3:

Incase of breathing difficulty, apply Prone Ventilation technique. It can be done at home easily without any special equipment.

Here is the evidence:

With the first sign of Flu contact us at or call us at 8587059169 for free support, guidance and treatment.


How They Kill Corona Patients in 3 Steps?

Step 1:

Face mask causes stagnation/collection of all kind of Virus (including corona virus) and frequent touching of mask. (23 times per hour) causes increase in transmission of virus  means more illness and more deaths.


Step 2:

Corona Virus in upper respiratory tract  (mouth, nose, throat) is not at all deadly and cannot cause complication or death.

Giving patients-

1. Antibiotics

2. Antipyretic drugs

3. Anti viral drugs

4. Anti malarial drug

Causes the virus spread to the lower respiratory tract (Lungs). By 7th day it may cause breathing difficulties, pneumonia like symptoms and oxygen deficiency in patients.


Step 3:

Covid19 patients with breathing difficulty leads to

External Oxygen given to them  through mechanical ventilators leads to Upto 94% deaths

Click Here for Evidence :

End Note:  Lockdown/ social distancing cannot protect you from corona virus only your immunity can!

Here are the Evidences:

A  N.I.C.E  initiative by:

Dr Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury (PhD Diabetes),

Dr K B Tumane  Ex-Chief Doctor (Deputy Director Health Services) of Nagpur Municipal corporation. 

14 Zul-Qa’dh 1442 – 25 June 2021





Dr. Reiner Fuellmich explains that all the leading scientific experts (i.e. those who have not sold out or buried their heads under the sand) such as the Nobel Prize winner, Luc Montagnier, and former vice-president of Pfizer, Mike Yeadon, predict that when the vaccinated people come into contact with the mild flu disease in the upcoming seasons, there will be catastrophic consequences.

This prediction is scientifically based on decades of testing of coronavirus vaccines on animals in which the majority of vaccinated specimens suffered fatally after encountering the mild disease in the wild. Recent testing on humans also support this ominous prediction.

Luc Montagnier, for example, stated about the vaccination programme:

“It’s an enormous mistake, isn’t it? A scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that…You see it in each country, it’s the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths. I’m following this closely…many people know this, epidemiologists know it…It’s what we call Antibody Dependent Enhancement (an often fatal over-reaction by a sensitized immune system to a disease in the wild).”

(Reference: the original video and audio is widely available and easily verifiable online)

Incidentally, a fake version of Luc Montagnier’s statements has been conveniently released and made viral, along with the expected refutations by the Bill Gates’ funded fact-checkers, in order to distract from the actual and terrifying ramifications of Luc Montagnier’s original and unaltered statements above.

(End of the Scientist’s statement)

Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Majeed:

“They plot and Allah also plots, and Allah is the best of plotters.”

“Verily, they plotted their conspiracy whilst their plot is by Allah. Indeed their plot is (so villainous) that even mountains will move.”

All of these jaahil, munaafiq molvis and shaikhs who are promoting the kufr protocols of the atheists are integral cogs in this stupendous, dark, satanic plot of the western kuffaar. They are being hemmed in by the very covid-disease plot which they are promoting. They will perish like kilaab and khanaazeer, and bee bundled and cast into Jahannam.

11 Zul-Qa’dh 1442 – 22 June 2021

‘Urgent’ British report calls for complete cessation of COVID vaccines in humans

An “urgent preliminary report of Yellow Card data” issued by the UK-based Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd submitted to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) states that “the MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans.”

Similar to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), the MHRA describes the purpose of its Yellow Card system as providing “an early warning that the safety of a medicine or a medical device may require further investigation.”

The report, signed by Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy Ltd and EbMC Squared CiC Director Dr. Tess Lawrie (MBBCh, PhD), says: “we have searched the Yellow Card reports using pathology-specific key words to group the data according to the following five [sic] broad, clinically relevant categories:

Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic ADRs
Immune System ADRs
‘Pain’ ADRs
Neurological ADRs
ADRs involving loss of Sight, Hearing, Speech or Smell
Pregnancy ADRs”

The report goes on to say: “We are aware of the limitations of pharmacovigilance data and understand that information on reported Adverse Drug Reactions should not be interpreted as meaning that the medicine in question generally causes the observed effect or is unsafe to use.

We are sharing this preliminary report due to the urgent need to communicate information that should lead to cessation of the vaccination roll out while a full investigation is conducted.

According to the recent paper by Seneff and Nigh, potential acute and long-term pathologies include:

Pathogenic priming, multisystem inflammatory disease and autoimmunity
Allergic reactions and anaphylaxis
Antibody dependent enhancement
Activation of latent viral infections
Neurodegeneration and prion diseases
Emergence of novel variants of SARSCoV2
Integration of the spike protein gene into the human DNA
“It is now apparent that these products in the blood stream are toxic to humans. An immediate halt to the vaccination programme is required whilst a full and independent safety analysis is undertaken to investigate the full extent of the harms, which the UK Yellow Card data suggest include thromboembolism, multisystem inflammatory disease, immune suppression, autoimmunity and anaphylaxis, as well as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE).”

The report concludes: “The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans. Preparation should be made to scale up humanitarian efforts to assist those harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines and to anticipate and ameliorate medium to longer term effects. As the mechanism for harms from the vaccines appears to be similar to COVID-19 itself, this includes engaging with numerous international doctors and scientists with expertise in successfully treating COVID-19.

“There are at least 3 urgent questions that need to be answered by the MHRA:

  • How many people have died within 28 days of vaccination?
  • How many people have been hospitalised within 28 days of vaccination?
  • How many people have been disabled by the vaccination?”…

Vaccines are dangerous

Click to access Vaccines%20are%20dangerous09062021.pdf

Vaccines are dangerous

  1. Just as smoking could be and was predicted to cause lung cancer based on first principles, all gene-based vaccines can be expected to cause blood clotting and bleeding disorders [33], based on their molecular mechanisms of action. Consistent with this, diseases of this kind have been observed across age groups, leading to temporary vaccine suspensions around the world: The vaccines are not safe.
  2. Contrary to claims that blood disorders post-vaccination are “rare”, many common vaccine side effects (headaches, nausea, vomiting and haematoma-like “rashes” over the body) may indicate thrombosis and other severe abnormalities. Moreover, vaccine-induced diffuse micro-thromboses in the lungs can mimic pneumonia and may be misdiagnosed as COVID-19. Clotting events currently receiving media attention are likely just the “tip of a huge iceberg” [34]: The vaccines are not safe.
  3. Due to immunological priming, risks of clotting, bleeding and other adverse events can be expected to increase with each re-vaccination and each intervening coronavirus exposure. Over time, whether months or years [35], this renders both vaccination and coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom without vaccination COVID-19 poses no substantive risk.Since vaccine roll-out, COVID-19 incidence has risen in numerous areas with high vaccination rates [36–38]. Furthermore, multiple series of COVID-19 fatalities have occurred shortly after the onset vaccinations in senior homes [39,40]. These cases may have been due not only to antibody-dependent enhancement but also to a general immunosuppressive effect of the vaccines, which is suggested by the increased occurrence of Herpes zoster in certain patients [41]. Immunosuppression may have caused a previously asymptomatic infection to become clinically manifest. Regardless of the exact mechanism responsible for these reported deaths, we must expect that the vaccines will increase rather than decrease lethality of COVID-19 — the vaccines are not safe.
  4. The vaccines are experimental by definition. They will remain in Phase 3 trials until 2023. Recipients are human subjects entitled to free informed consent under Nuremberg and other protections, including the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe’s resolution 2361 [42] and the FDA’s terms of emergency use authorisation [29]. With respect to safety data from Phase 1 and 2 trials, in spite of initially large sample sizes the journal Vaccine reports that, “the vaccination strategy chosen for further development may have only been given to as few as 12 participants” [32]. With such extremely small sample sizes, the journal notes that, “larger Phase 3 studies conducted over longer periods of time will be necessary” to establish safety. The risks that remain to be evaluated in Phase 3 trials into 2023, with entire populations as subjects, include not only thrombosis and bleeding abnormalities, but other autoimmune responses, allergic reactions, unknown tropisms (tissue destinations) of lipid nanoparticles [35], antibody-dependent enhancement [43–46] and the impact of rushed, questionably executed, poorly regulated [47] and reportedly inconsistent manufacturing methods, conferring risks of potentially harmful impurities such as uncontrolled DNA residues [48]. The vaccines are not safe, either for recipients or for those who administer them or authorise their use.
  5. Initial experience might suggest that the adenovirus-derived vaccines (AstraZeneca/Johnson & Johnson) cause graver adverse effects than the mRNA (Pfizer/Moderna) vaccines. However, upon repeated injection, the former will soon induce antibodies against the proteins of the adenovirus vector. These antibodies will then neutralize most of the vaccine virus particles and cause their disposal before they can infect any cells, thereby limiting the intensity of tissue damage.In contrast, in the mRNA vaccines, there is no protein antigen for the antibodies to recognize. Thus, regardless of the existing degree of immunity, the vaccine mRNA is going to reach its target — the body cells. These will then express the spike protein and subsequently suffer the full onslaught of the immune system. With the mRNA vaccines, the risk of severe adverse events is virtually guaranteed to increase with every successive injection. In the long term, they are therefore even more dangerous than the vector vaccines. Their apparent preferment over the latter is concerning in the highest degree; these vaccines are not safe.


  1. Le Bert, N.; Tan, A.T.; Kunasegaran, K.; Tham, C.Y.L.; Hafezi, M.; Chia, A.; Chng, M.H.Y.; Lin, M.; Tan, N.; Linster, M.; Chia, W.N.; Chen, M.I.; Wang, L.; Ooi, E.E.; Kalimuddin, S.; Tambyah, P.A.; Low, J.G.; Tan, Y. and Bertoletti, A. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457–462
  2. Tarke, A.; Sidney, J.; Methot, N.; Zhang, Y.; Dan, J.M.; Goodwin, B.; Rubiro, P.; Sutherland, A.; da Silva Antunes, R.; Frazier, A. and al., e. (2021) Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees. bioRxiv -:x-x
  3. Anonymous, (2020) Scientists uncover SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in recovered COVID-19 and SARS patients.
  4. Beasley, D. (2020) Scientists focus on how immune system T cells fight coronavirus in absence of antibodies.
  5. Bozkus, C.C. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells without antibodies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20:463
  6. Grifoni, A.; Weiskopf, D.; Ramirez, S.I.; Mateus, J.; Dan, J.M.; Moderbacher, C.R.; Rawlings, S.A.; Sutherland, A.; Premkumar, L.; Jadi, R.S. and al., e. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181:1489–1501.e15
  7. Mateus, J.; Grifoni, A.; Tarke, A.; Sidney, J.; Ramirez, S.I.; Dan, J.M.; Burger, Z.C.; Rawlings, S.A.; Smith, D.M.; Phillips, E. and al., e. (2020) Selective and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes in unexposed humans. Science 370:89–94
  8. McCurry-Schmidt, M. (2020) Exposure to common cold coronaviruses can teach the immune system to recognize SARS-CoV-2.
  9. Palmer, S.; Cunniffe, N. and Donnelly, R. (2021) COVID-19 hospitalization rates rise exponentially with age, inversely proportional to thymic T-cell production. J. R. Soc. Interface 18:20200982
  10. Sekine, T.; Perez-Potti, A.; Rivera-Ballesteros, O.; Strålin, K.; Gorin, J.; Olsson, A.; Llewellyn-Lacey, S.; Kamal, H.; Bogdanovic, G.; Muschiol, S. and al., e. (2020) Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19. Cell183:158–168.e14
  11. Drake, J. (2021) Now We Know: Covid-19 Vaccines Prevent Asymptomatic Infection, Too.
  12. Bossuyt, P.M. (2020) Testing COVID-19 tests faces methodological challenges. Journal of clinical epidemiology 126:172–176
  13. Jefferson, T.; Spencer, E.; Brassey, J. and Heneghan, C. (2020) Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectivity assessment. Systematic review. Clin. Infect. Dis. ciaa1764:x-x
  14. Borger, P.; Malhotra, R.K.; Yeadon, M.; Craig, C.; McKernan, K.; Steger, K.; McSheehy, P.; Angelova, L.; Franchi, F.; Binder, T.; Ullrich, H.; Ohashi, M.; Scoglio, S.; Doesburg-van Kleffens, M.; Gilbert, D.; Klement, R.J.; Schrüfer, R.; Pieksma, B.W.; Bonte, J.; Dalle Carbonare, B.H.; Corbett, K.P. and Kämmer, U. (2020) External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
  15. Mandavilli, A. (2020) Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
  16. Cao, S.; Gan, Y.; Wang, C.; Bachmann, M.; Wei, S.; Gong, J.; Huang, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, L.; Lu, K.; Jiang, H.; Gong, Y.; Xu, H.; Shen, X.; Tian, Q.; Lv, C.; Song, F.; Yin, X. and Lu, Z. (2020) Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China. Nat. Commun. 11:5917
  17. Moghadas, S.M.; Fitzpatrick, M.C.; Sah, P.; Pandey, A.; Shoukat, A.; Singer, B.H. and Galvani, A.P. (2020) The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117:17513–17515
  18. Johansson, M.A.; Quandelacy, T.M.; Kada, S.; Prasad, P.V.; Steele, M.; Brooks, J.T.; Slayton, R.B.; Biggerstaff, M. and Butler, J.C. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 Transmission From People Without COVID-19 Symptoms. JAMA network open 4:e2035057
  19. Yeadon, M. (2020). What SAGE got wrong. Lockdown Skeptics.
  20. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2020) Global perspective of COVID‐19 epidemiology for a full‐cycle pandemic. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 50:x-x
  21. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2021) Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID‐19: An overview of systematic evaluations. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. -:x-x
  22. CDC, (2020) Science Brief: Community Use of Cloth Masks to Control the Spread of SARS-CoV-2.
  23. Orient, J.; McCullough, P. and Vliet, E. (2020) A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment.
  24. McCullough, P.A.; Alexander, P.E.; Armstrong, R.; Arvinte, C.; Bain, A.F.; Bartlett, R.P.; Berkowitz, R.L.; Berry, A.C.; Borody, T.J.; Brewer, J.H.; Brufsky, A.M.; Clarke, T.; Derwand, R.; Eck, A.; Eck, J.; Eisner, R.A.; Fareed, G.C.; Farella, A.; Fonseca, S.N.S.; Geyer, C.E.; Gonnering, R.S.; Graves, K.E.; Gross, K.B.V.; Hazan, S.; Held, K.S.; Hight, H.T.; Immanuel, S.; Jacobs, M.M.; Ladapo, J.A.; Lee, L.H.; Littell, J.; Lozano, I.; Mangat, H.S.; Marble, B.; McKinnon, J.E.; Merritt, L.D.; Orient, J.M.; Oskoui, R.; Pompan, D.C.; Procter, B.C.; Prodromos, C.; Rajter, J.C.; Rajter, J.; Ram, C.V.S.; Rios, S.S.; Risch, H.A.; Robb, M.J.A.; Rutherford, M.; Scholz, M.; Singleton, M.M.; Tumlin, J.A.; Tyson, B.M.; Urso, R.G.; Victory, K.; Vliet, E.L.; Wax, C.M.; Wolkoff, A.G.; Wooll, V. and Zelenko, V. (2020) Multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 21:517–530
  25. Procter, {.B.C.; {APRN}, {.C.R.{.; {PA}-C, {.V.P.; {PA}-C, {.E.S.; {PA}-C, {.C.H. and McCullough, {.{.P.A. (2021) Early Ambulatory Multidrug Therapy Reduces Hospitalization and Death in High-Risk Patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). International journal of innovative research in medical science 6:219–221
  26. McCullough, P.A.; Kelly, R.J.; Ruocco, G.; Lerma, E.; Tumlin, J.; Wheelan, K.R.; Katz, N.; Lepor, N.E.; Vijay, K.; Carter, H.; Singh, B.; McCullough, S.P.; Bhambi, B.K.; Palazzuoli, A.; De Ferrari, G.M.; Milligan, G.P.; Safder, T.; Tecson, K.M.; Wang, D.D.; McKinnon, J.E.; O’Neill, W.W.; Zervos, M. and Risch, H.A. (2021) Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection. Am. J. Med. 134:16–22
  27. Anonymous, (2020) Real-time database and meta analysis of 588 COVID-19 studies.
  28. Hirschhorn, J.S. (2021) COVID scandal: Feds ignored 2016 law requiring use of real world evidence.
  29. Anonymous, (1998) Emergency Use of an Investigational Drug or Biologic: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators.
  30. Anonymous, (2021) EMA assessment report: Comirnaty.
  31. Anonymous, (2020) FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
  32. Giurgea, L.T. and Memoli, M.J. (2020) Navigating the Quagmire: Comparison and Interpretation of COVID-19 Vaccine Phase 1/2 Clinical Trials. Vaccines 8:746
  33. Bhakdi, S.; Chiesa, M.; Frost, S.; Griesz-Brisson, M.; Haditsch, M.; Hockertz, S.; Johnson, L.; Kämmerer, U.; Palmer, M.; Reiss, K.; Sönnichsen, A.; Wodarg, W. and Yeadon, M. (2021) Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns.
  34. Bhakdi, S. (2021) Rebuttal letter to European Medicines Agency from Doctors for Covid Ethics, April 1, 2021.
  35. Ulm, J.W. (2020) Rapid response to: Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us.
  36. Reimann, N. (2021) Covid Spiking In Over A Dozen States — Most With High Vaccination Rates.
  37. Meredith, S. (2021) Chile has one of the world’s best vaccination rates. Covid is surging there anyway.
  38. Bhuyan, A. (2021) Covid-19: India sees new spike in cases despite vaccine rollout. BMJ 372:n854
  39. Morrissey, K. (2021) Open letter to Dr. Karina Butler.
  40. Anonymous, (2021) Open Letter from the UK Medical Freedom Alliance: Urgent warning re Covid-19 vaccine-related deaths in the elderly and Care Homes.
  41. Furer, V.; Zisman, D.; Kibari, A.; Rimar, D.; Paran, Y. and Elkayam, O. (2021) Herpes zoster following BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a case series. Rheumatology -:x-x
  42. Anonymous, (2021) Covid-19 vaccines: ethical, legal and practical considerations.
  43. Tseng, C.; Sbrana, E.; Iwata-Yoshikawa, N.; Newman, P.C.; Garron, T.; Atmar, R.L.; Peters, C.J. and Couch, R.B. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One7:e35421
  44. Bolles, M.; Deming, D.; Long, K.; Agnihothram, S.; Whitmore, A.; Ferris, M.; Funkhouser, W.; Gralinski, L.; Totura, A.; Heise, M. and Baric, R.S. (2011) A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J. Virol. 85:12201–15
  45. Weingartl, H.; Czub, M.; Czub, S.; Neufeld, J.; Marszal, P.; Gren, J.; Smith, G.; Jones, S.; Proulx, R.; Deschambault, Y.; Grudeski, E.; Andonov, A.; He, R.; Li, Y.; Copps, J.; Grolla, A.; Dick, D.; Berry, J.; Ganske, S.; Manning, L. and Cao, J. (2004) Immunization with modified vaccinia virus Ankara-based recombinant vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome is associated with enhanced hepatitis in ferrets. J. Virol. 78:12672–6
  46. Czub, M.; Weingartl, H.; Czub, S.; He, R. and Cao, J. (2005) Evaluation of modified vaccinia virus Ankara based recombinant SARS vaccine in ferrets. Vaccine 23:2273–9
  47. Tinari, S. (2021) The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability. BMJ 372:n627
  48. Anonymous, (2021) Interview with Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Krüger.

27 Shawwaal 1442 – 9 June 2021