Q. A person takes a Covid test. The test shows positive. Either they are symptomatic or asymptomatic. There are 4 questions that arise:
(A) They, in accordance with government guidelines, isolate for the stated period in the belief of indiscriminate contagion. What is the state of such a person’s Imaan and Nikah?
(B) Some argue, that Islam teaches us to take reasonable precautions and this constitutes a reasonable precaution. This in reality is a disingenuous argument to cover for their belief in contagion contrary to the explicit teaching of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam. What is the state of such a person’s Imaan and Nikah?
(C) Persons in above 2 categories then tell others that they should test themselves and isolate if need be. In other words they are pushing their ideology on to others. How should a Muslim deal with such requests which are constant?
(D) There are many “Muslims” who hold such beliefs. Does this mean a whole swathe of them exit the fold of Islam?
A. 1) If the isolation is self-imposed, not forced by the zaalim government, and if this person has been informed that disease is not contagious, then his belief based on what the atheists inform him, is kufr. He should renew his Imaan as well as his Nikah.
2) While Islam advises laymen such as us to adopt reasonable, lawful precautions, it NEVER advises adoption of kufr. Kufr is not a precaution. It is satanism. If these protocols of the atheists are valid precautions, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah would have adopted same on the command of Allah Ta’ala. However, the Qur’aan and Sunnah emphatically negate these acts of shaitaan being precautions. Please read the numerous articles and booklets we have published on this subject. All are available on our website.
3) Their ideology and advice to others are kufr with the same consequences mentioned in No.1 above.
4) Most certainly it “means that a whole swathe of them exit the fold of Islam.” And, this is not surprising because Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had predicted this type of kufr which cancels Imaan. Hadhrat Abdullah Bin Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu) narrated the following Hadith:
“An age will dawn when the people will gather in their Musaajid and perform Salaat whilst not a single one will be a Mu’min.”
FROM THE MAJLIS 26/03
The notion that diseases are contagious is a result of our worship of the means. No matter what present day research may say, the
research of the Sharī‛at is that the One who caused the first person to fall ill has caused the second one to fall ill as well. It is possible that others in the same house may also succumb to that illness. However, if our gaze is on the Absolute Power, then is it not better to attribute that illness to divine will than to the means? Is the will of Allāh ta‛ālā not even equal to the effect of means? We seek refuge in Allāh ta‛ālā.
The fact of the matter is that every person who is weak in his faith will rationalize his worship of the means by saying: “I do not deny the power of Allāh ta‛ālā but it is His norm that when a contagious disease enters a house, it is also passed on to others in that house.” The tauhīd of a Muslim demands that he attributes every single thing to the will of Allāh ta‛ālā. When this is realized, the means will become inconsequential in his sight. And if he has been blessed with full confidence in Allāh ta‛ālā, then the mysteries behind the effects of the means will be fully exposed to him.
Hadrat Maulānā Badr ‛Ālam rahimahullāh As quoted from Aqwāl-e-Salaf, vol. 9, pp. 605-606.
Q. Why did our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) say that one should flee from the leper? Does this not indicate that disease is contagious?
A. You may pose this question to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) on the Day of Qiyaamah if you are afforded an opportunity of meeting him. Why are you stupidly seeking to cancel Rasulullah’s explicit La Adwaa (Disease is not contagious) declaration with the leper Hadith? Why are you casting a blind eye in this direction? Only nifaaq or kufr or extreme deficiency of Imaan constrains a person to abrogate the Ahkaam of the Shariah by means of creating satanic contradictions. Regardless of the reason for fleeing from a leper, the irrefutable fact is that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “La Adwaa”. This suffices for a Mu’min, not for a munaafiq. If someone decides to flee from a leper, he may do so, but he may not utilize the narration
to deny the immutable Truth of the statement made by our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) regarding his negation of the kufr idea of contagion which was the belief of the mushrikeen, and which is still the idea of the atheists of this era. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) advised fleeing from a leper because of Imaani
weakness of people such as you. The fleeing is not for those whose Imaan is sound. While people cite this narration to bolster the ideas of the atheists, they conveniently ‘forget’ that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) ate together with a leper from the same bowl. He said to the leper: “Eat and have tawakkul on Allah.” They will not mention that the lepers were not banned from the Musjid nor were they quarantined,
etc. A person who cites this or similar narrations to bolster the kuffaar theory and to scuttle the negation of contagion by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) do so at the peril of losing their Imaan.
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam said:
“LAA ADWAA – DISEASE IS NOT CONTAGIOUS”
The infamous and notorious red herring of the munaafiqeen and morons is their dangling of two alleged views of the Ulama in front of the ignorant and unwary laymen to obfuscate them. This is a hoodwinking stunt inspired by Shaitaan to detract focus from Allah Ta’ala and to give preference to the kufr contagion theory of the atheists as the basis for the introduction of the host of filth and shaitaaniyat into the Musaajid.
Their allegation is that there are two valid views regarding disease being contagious or not. The one view according to the munaafiqeen and such morons who may not be munaafiq, but are sufficiently stupid to swallow the kufr idea of the atheists and the agents of Iblees, namely the molvis and sheikhs such as Reverend Abraham Bham, Tony Karaan and the Menk character, is that disease is contagious, and the other view is that it is not contagious.
On the basis of the first alleged view, the munaafiqeen peddle the hallucinated correctness of the theory and protocols of the atheists. Be assured that there is only ONE view of the Authorities of the Shariah. Not a single Faqeeh has proffered a view in conflict with the explicit LAA Adwaa declaration of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
The one group of Fuqaha who say that disease is contagious clearly restrict the contagion to the Mashiyat (Will) of Allah Ta’ala. That is: a disease can be contagious only if Allah wills. Without His will and command, a disease cannot be contagious.
The other group of Fuqaha who say that disease is not contagious clearly mention that a disease can be contagious with the Mashiyat of Allah Ta’ala. How is it ever possible for even an ignorant Muslim, leave alone a Faqeeh, to claim that a disease is not contagious even if Allah so wills?
It should thus be clear that there is no difference of opinion regarding contagion. So what is the hullabaloo about? The difference pertains to inherent sababiyat, i.e. attributes created by Allah Ta’ala and instilled in an entity to act accordingly. This is known as the natural cause. This issue is explained in detail in our booklet: The Red Herring Presentation of Ahadith on the Issue of Contagion. This booklet is available on our website. Hard copies will also be available.
25 Zul Hajj 1441 – 15 August 2020