Atheist Logic 101: Examining the Link Between Religion and Intelligence

Ustadh Daniel Haqiqatjou recently debated Aaron Ra, an ardent representative of idiotic atheism. Ra argued the typical nonsensical rubbish that we are so accustomed to hearing from new atheism. As one of his actual arguments, he said that atheists have higher IQ scores than theists, attempting to demonstrate how atheism is true but theists are ultimately just too stupid to understand this “fact.”

Here are some interesting statistics (taken from a 2019 Forbes article) that we can show Aaron and his ilk:

This comparison between the current IQ scores with the number of Nobel Prize winners and the standardized school level of each country is interesting. Why? Because it is supposed to provide an indication of where each country is situated intellectually, past; present; and future.

Nobel Prizes illustrate the intellectual prowess of those who were educated yesterday. IQs reveal the intellectual capabilities of the current population. School levels indicate the potential of the next generation.

In addition to this, these metrics are generally accepted by atheists themselves, and there is no greater satisfaction than beating an opponent at their own game. As for us, as Muslims, we shouldn’t afford too much credit to these tests, especially since they often conceal a lot of antagonistic, normative criteria under the false pretense of neutral descriptivism.

Keep in mind that the Nobel Prizes are a very biased and controversial institution which is known to have, throughout its history, favored certain select demographics over others. As for IQ scores, they were developed by materialistic atheists that hold a subjective view of what constitutes “valuable cognitive capacities” and what does not.

RELATED: Latest Arab Youth Survey: Less Democracy and More Shariah Please!

Scientific theories and models are always changing, and no psychiatrist in the world to date can claim to have developed an exhaustive and comprehensive theory of intelligence. The study of intelligence is a field that contains many competing theories and models. To rely so heavily on such shallow metrics is already an L for atheists.

In any case, the statistics displayed above provide us with an interesting conclusion regarding the correlation between religiosity and intelligence. Contrary to the claims and predictions of these know-it-all atheists, many liberal and atheistic countries are actually in intellectual decline. For instance, consider France, which has one of the largest non-religious populations in the world and is declining rapidly in terms of intelligence. Look also at how low the Czech Republic is on the board, while being one of the most atheistic countries in the world.

In fact, the intellectual decline of these atheistic countries could very well indicate the exact opposite of what they claim. If we follow their line of thinking, irreligiosity may actually be correlated with stupidity. Now I must admit myself that this would not be a very reliable conclusion. The reason for this is that these changes are more likely an indication that Nobel Prizes, IQs and School Levels are linked to socioeconomic factors.

This just goes to show just how incompetent these atheists really are. They try to establish all kinds of corresponding links in order to try and score points, but they refuse to confront the hollowness of their empty philosophy.

There is a valuable lesson to be taken away here:

Don’t be fooled by random statistics presented to you by insincere perverted morons, and always thoroughly scrutinise their shallow arguments.

RELATED: Arabs Are Getting More Religious. Why Isn’t Western Media Reporting It?



“Say (O Muhammad): ‘O you kaafiroon! I do not worship that (atheists and idols) which you worship. And you do not worship what I worship. And I do not (and shall not) worship what you worship. For you is your religion (of atheism to bootlick), and for me is my (glittering) Deen.’ ” (Surah Kaafiroon)
“No person will die except at the appointed time with the permission of Allah.” (Qur’aan)

“Whatever calamity befalls you, is on account of what your hands have wrought. And He forgives in abundance (your transgressions).” (Qur’aan)

This pandemic of satanic fear has sifted out the people of nifaaq and kufr from the People of Imaan. While the people of Imaan follow the Qur’aan and Sunnah, the cartel of bootlicking munaafiqeen follow the kufr theories of the atheists.

These minaafiqeen bootlickers satanically use Qur’aan and hadith to “prove” veracity for the Satanism of the atheists. They grovel in the gutters to find Hadith proof for the kufr ideologies of the atheists.

The camel has to be tied only within the fetters of the Qur’aan and Sunnah. Beyond these limits is kufr.

“These are the limits of Allah. Whoever transgresses these limits verily he has oppressed his own soul.”

Turn the pages of history to see and understand how our Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahabah had tied the camel in the plague of Madinah and in the plague of Amwaas.

The plague moves, assaults and kills by Allah’s Command. No one can flee from Maut. While the ideology of the atheists advocates flight from the sick who are in need, Islam commands visiting and aiding the sick – not abandoning them as the theories of the Satanists demand. Cowardice is integral to kufr and nifaaq, hence they abandon even their aged parents believing that maintaining a distance will save them from Maut.

The Munaafiqeen should search for themselves another religion and cease masquerading as Muslims. There is no space in Islam for these bootlicking munaafiqeen. These munaafiqeen are the slaves of the atheists who wallow in janaabat and kufr. They follow and lick these atheists right into the “lizard’s hole”, while the Mu’mineen follow the pure and holy ta’leem of the Qur’aan and Sunnah besides which there is no other directive for us. Our Pathway is bright and glittering, leading to Jannat whereas there is nothing but darkness and Divine Wrath for the Munaafiqeen who cherish an inveterate aversion for Salaat, for the Musaajid and for Islam. Like Iblees, they abhor Sujood. Iblees is their guide in abstention from Salaat and the Musjid. Our Abodes of Rahmat are the Musaajid, while the abodes of La’nat for the Munaafiqeen are the malls of the atheists whose boots they lick night and day. The La’nat of Allah and His Malaaikah are on them.

Increase Istighfaar, Durood Shareef and Kalimah Tayyibah. Keep the focus on Allah Ta’ala.

May Allah Ta’ala take us from this dunya with our Imaan intact. Aameen!

15 Zil Qa’dh 1441 – 7 July 2020

The Mock “Free Speech” Stunt of the Western Extremists’

By Daniel Haqiqatjou

Every now and then, a “brave” atheist mocks Islam, burns pages from the Qur’an, publishes a cartoon insulting the Prophet ﷺ , etc., and justifies his attack by claiming that he is demonstrating the value of free speech.

You see, he explains, in the free and enlightened West, there is this golden principle called free speech that allows us to publicly say whatever we want about anything, no matter how offensive closed minded Muslims might find it. In fact, he argues, we must strive to be as offensive as possible on occasion because the more offensive we are, the more we demonstrate how free and liberated we are from authority – the more we demonstrate our belief that there is nothing that is sacred!

Whenever an atheist or liberal secularist in the West gives you this dumb lecture, simply ask him whether he is willing to demonstrate the beautiful, inviolable principle of free speech by publicly denying or mocking the Holocaust.

Then sit back and watch him squirm.
To date, you will find the bastion of “free expression” Charlie Hebdo magazine in France insult almost every religion with crude, disgusting portrayals of Jesus, etc. But they have never mocked anything related to that particular historical event.

Or how about all these brave atheists and “ex-Muslim” murtaddin who puff their chests and tell us about how oppressed they are while spewing the most vile words against Islam. Why don’t they extend the scope of insult and demonstrate “true” freedom? Why this limit to their willingness to offend? Why this selectivity? Are some things truly sacred for them?

Of course, I’m not advocating anyone publicly mock war and genocide. But that’s because of my religious principles coupled with the fact that I find the whole liberal argument for free speech and the connection between insult and freedom stupid and incoherent.

The free speech extremists, however, have to explain their arbitrary limits. They can’t.

The real question, then, is who decided what is or is not off limits for mockery? Are the edgy satirists at Charlie Hebdo and the atheists in the West really bucking authority and demonstrating their freedom when they mock Islam, which is not even considered sacred in the societies they live in? If they are as principled and brave as they constantly tell everyone they are, why don’t they move past the soft targets and publish something “truly” obscene?

You will find that they, too, are not willing to tolerate blasphemy against their gods.



A Deeni Student from the U.K. writes:

Indoctrinated by western and secularist values of ‘tolerance’, ‘kindness’ and liberalism, many Muslims, living in the west, who do little to preserve their Imaan, often ask, how is it possible that a loving, kind Jew or Christian with exemplary character will go to Jahannam?

Implicit in this question is their lack of knowledge of explicit text of the Qur’an in which Allah Ta’ala says the only Deen acceptable to him is Islam & that every sin can be forgiven except kufr/shirk.
Some of these so-called Muslims who ask this question in various ways to obtain the answer they want, do in fact have a vague knowledge of these verses. Hence, by their continuous questioning on this issue, they demonstrate the kufr lurking in their hearts. What other conclusion can be drawn when a person implicitly and continuously questions the Law of Allah?
These youth fail to understand that values of kindness, tolerance, love etc. are divinely determined by the Almighty, not by their own intellect which has become vegetative due to the values of secularism they have absorbed over a period of time.
The abode of Abu Talib, who supported, defended and loved Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam is made clear in Qur’an, yet so-called Muslims argue that a Member of Parliament in UK, namely Jo Cox, who supported Muslim causes and was murdered will go to heaven because of her “good character.”
When the youth of today are presented with the explicit text of Qur’an and Ahadith which negate their notion that not all Jews and Christians will go to Jahannam, they then throw a curve ball in to the equation stating: “Who are we to judge, Allah is most merciful?” Yes, Allah is most merciful, but he is also the: Avenger, Just, Reducer, Abaser and Retaliator.
When He has laid out explicitly and unambiguously the position of a non- Muslim in the hereafter, regardless of his good deeds, since when did it become acceptable to impliedly plead his/her case in this dunya?
Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam was forbidden from making du’a for his beloved uncle after he passed away, due to his disbelief, yet Muslims today are praying for Ms Jo Cox.
Love, tolerance, compassion, mercy are all encapsulated within the Deen, yet lack of effort on Imaan has led to adoption of western and secularist definitions.
Little do these Muslims realise the gravity of the crime of kufr and ascribing sons to Allah. This is treason like no other, yet “Muslims”, fearful of their shadow, continue their concomitance with kufr by stating: “I break boundaries and not hearts.” The surreptitious kufr present in this statement is obvious to a person with true Imaan. (End of the Student’s article)

It is only hidden kufr lurking in the heart which constrains people to pose this type of question which is in diametric conflict with the Qur’aan Majeed. Allah Ta’ala states explicitly in the Qur’aan Majeed that:

Besides Islam, no other religion is acceptable to Him.
The deeds (i.e. good deeds) of the kuffaar are like mirages and will not be accepted in the Aakhirat.

With their emotions constrained by their hidden kufr, they will not be able to gain salvation for the kuffaar in the Hereafter. Regardless of their emotions and views, the lot of the kuffaar cannot be altered. How exactly Allah Ta’ala will treat the kuffaar in general, and kuffaar in particular in the Aakhirah is not our concern. We have no power over the decrees and decisions of Allah Azza Wa Jal. What we are aware of is that Allah Ta’ala is Aadil (Just)and Rahmaan (Most Merciful), and Hakeem (Most Wise).

Thus, whatever Allah Ta’la will do with the kuffaar in the Aakhirat will be in consonance with His Adl, Rahmat and Hikmat. If Allah Ta’ala wills to assign all the kuffaar to Jannat and all the Muslims to Jahannam, it will be in conformity with His eternal Sifaat of Adl, Rahmat and Hikmat.
We are bound to focus on the Shariah – on the teachings of the Qur’aan and Sunnah. We are not supposed to glance beyond the confines of the Shariah and to create turmoil in our beliefs by postulating unfounded, unsubstantiated theories acquired by means of hallucination. Regardless of how appealing and appeasing to the westernized intellect the theory of salvation for kuffaar may appear, the fact remains that it is totally unsubstantiated by the Qur’aan and Ahaadith. In fact, it is in glaring conflict with the teachings of the Deen.

If a westernized brain is overwhelmed with a peculiar conception of ‘kindness’. ‘tolerance’ and ‘mercy’, which in terms of the Shariah is kufr, the repository of such a kufr theory should endeavour to understand that his theory is firstly uncorroborated by Shar’i evidence, and secondly, his theory cannot compel Allah Ta’ala to change His Law. The Qur’aan Majeed states several times: “You will not find any change for the Sunnah of Allah.”
Then it is imperative for the westernized person who professes Islam, to understand that whatever Allah Ta’ala will do with the kuffaar on the Day of Qiyaamah will be His prerogative, and no amount of concern by people will be able to interdict Allah’s prerogative. Thus, he should convince himself that whatever treatment Allah Ta’ala will mete out to the kuffaar and to the most benevolent and kind kaafir will not be the effect of the theory he has conjectured. Now why encumber oneself with a theory/belief which could spell disaster for one’s own Imaan and which could destroy one’s salvation in the Aakhirat?

The question which these westernized minds pose is not only futile. It is destructive since it destroys Imaan. Fabricating theories of compassion will not avail Jo Cox. Whatever Allah Ta’ala has decreed for her will be her lot. It is most unintelligent to say the least, to become embroiled in an argument about the situation of Jo Cox and similar others. Our ideas and theories will not be the determinants for Allah Azza Wa Jal to decide their fate.

The springboard or the fundamental pivot of western education is atheism. It is therefore to be found that in every branch of western secular education the ethos is atheism. Atheism permeates every aspect of western secular education. Innumerable Muslims – Muslims by the million – have lost and destroyed their Imaan at the altar of western secular education. It is no wonder that the Akaabir Ulama had branded western education Haraam.

Whilst the products of western secular institutions do not openly profess to be atheists, their hearts are corrupted, brains convoluted and eternally ruined with the attitudes and ideas of atheism. May Allah Ta’ala save our Imaan from the onslaught of satanism and atheism.

30 Rabiyul Awwal 1439 – 19 December 2017


Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (Rahmatullah alayh) expressing his opinion regarding the Muslims of the city of Amritsar and Lahore (which was still in India at that time), said:

“I perceive the fragrance of Muhabbat (love for the Deen) emanating from the people (the Muslims) of Amritsar. But in Lahore, nothing but atheism and materialism are seen.”

That was 80 years ago. The condition of Imaan of Muslims, not only of Lahore, but of the world has deteriorated by leaps and bounds to enter into the realm of kufr. Today applies the Hadith narrated by Hadhrat Abdullah Bin Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu):

“A time will dawn when the people will gather in their Musaajid and perform Salaat while not a single one will be a Mu’min.”

Today, they are gathering even kuffaar and prostitutes in the Musaajid. The ‘open day’ Satanism initiated by professed ‘Muslims’ who are in reality munaafiqeen, also confirms the validity of the prediction of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Rasulullah

Thus, the universal (aam) Athaab (Punishment) of Allah Ta’ala befalling Ummah all over the world should not be surprising. May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on us. May He grant Muslims the taufeeq for Inaabat – to turn towards Him in repentance and with obedience.

25 Muharram 1441 – 25 September 2019