SALAAT AND SAUM IN ‘ABNORMAL’ TIME ZONES

SALAAT AND SAUM IN ‘ABNORMAL’ TIME ZONES

In some regions in proximity to the North Pole, e.g. Norway, the times in relation to the rest of the world are abnormal. Some days after sunset and even before disappearance of shufuq abyadh (the whitish glow in the western horizon after the redish glow), the sun rises. Thus, the time of Isha does not set in. In some regions the sun remains above the horizon for six months, and in some places it is night for six months.

       The classical Fuqaha had discussed and elaborated on this issue. According to one group of Fuqaha, Isha and all other Salaat remain obligatory and have to be performed in view of the command of five Fardh Salaat daily, which is substantiated by the Sunnah.

       The Sunnah has not excluded any land from this obligation. These Fuqaha base their ruling on the Hadith which says that during the era of Dajjal there will be a day the equivalent of one year. It will be a long day. The Sahaabah queried the performance of Salaat on that day. Will only five Salat be performed in that marathon day of a year? Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) explained that the times of Salaat will be calculated. That is: Five Salaat for every 24 hours.

       According to the other Fuqaha, the five Salaat are conditional with their five specific times. If the incidence of a specific Salaat time does not develop in a region, then that particular Salaat is waived. They present the analogy of Wudhu which has Four Fardh acts according to the Hanafi Math-hab. If both feet have been amputated, the fardh of washing the feet falls away. Similarly, the Fardh Salaat will be waived if its time does not develop in many regions.

       Regarding the Hadith pertaining to the era of Dajjaal, these Fuqaha are of the opinion that since it is in conflict with Qiyaas (Analogical Reason), it may not be presented as a basis for a ruling. In terms of the Usool of Fiqh, the Khilaaf-e-Qiyaas narration shall be confined to its original purpose and not be used as a basis for extrapolation for extending the ruling to another issue.

       Shaikh Akbar Muhayyuddeen Ibn Arabi (rahmatullah alayh) has elucidated this issue in his Futuhaat.  According to him, the event of the long day during the era of Dajjaal will in reality not be one year literally. The times of Salaat will be normal. However, due to the deception of Dajjaal people will not observe the movement of the sun, sunrise and sunset. The people will perceive this day to be as long as a year.

Download booklet

CREATED FOR THE AAKHIRAH

SAID RASULULLAH (SALLALLAHU ALAYHI WASALLAM) NOT FOR THE HARAAM MERRYMAKING CAMPING AND AMUSEMENT FUN OF MADRESAH MIFTAAHUL ULOOM KASAAN SKEERPOORT

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“If you knew what I know (of the Qabr and Qiyaamah), you will laugh little, cry much and not derive any pleasure from your wives, and you would flee into the wilderness……”

Yes, if you knew what our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) knew, you would not organize a merrymaking stupid “Youth Program”.

Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Majeed: “The life of this world is but play and amusement while the Abode of the Aakhirah is best for those who fear (those who have Taqwa and fear Allah Ta’ala).”

It is indeed lamentable that the Madrasah in Skeerpoort is disgracefully emulating the ways of the modernist deviates and even Ulama are promoting the haraam “camping, wrestling, swimming, archery and much more” –whatever this may mean – program organized by the misguided management of this Madrasah. While the Ummah universally is ablaze with jahaalat, misery, poverty and suffering of a variety of kinds – all facets of the Athaab of Allah Ta’ala – the Madrasah, totally impervious of all the misery and suffering, indulges in merrymaking. Instead of creating awareness of the Aakhirah in the youngsters – instead of instilling fear in them for the Qabr and Qiyaamah, the Madrasah is recklessly diverting the youngsters from the Deen and casting them into the jeefah (carrion) cauldron of the dunya.

The terms, wrestling, swimming and archery are used as decoys. Since these acts are praiseworthy in terms of the Hadith, the juhala molvis have latched on to them to bamboozle the ignorant and the unwary – to deceive them into understanding that the merrymaking kuffaar style camping is a Deeni program. But in reality, it is a far, very far call from the Deen. The lecture by Molvi Kajee and the Qiraat by some miscreant qaari are mere red herrings. In fact, the bayaan and the qiraat at this merrymaking camping program are like reciting Tasmiyah when consuming pork and wine.

What has happened to the Aql of these molvis and qaaris? Are their brains so clogged with love for the dunya’s jeefah that they so miserably fail to comprehend the evil and villainy of the merrymaking camping program? Allah Ta’ala, calling Muslims to open their clogged brains for understanding naseehat says in the Qur’aan Majeed:

“And on earth there are (numerous) signs (for deriving lesson), and even in yourselves. What! Have you no intelligence?”

Only such molvis who are bereft of Nooraani Aql are blind to the reality of the moral corruption and spiritual harm of these merrymaking programs. To the Sahaabah, wrestling, swimming, archery and fencing were not sporting activities. These were not merrymaking and fun programs such as the khuraafaat which molvis organize today.

After Isha, the children and even the adults have to be incumbently in their homes, not is the streets and not in the bush making merry with laughter and gluttony. And from whence did these molvis acquire the epithet “Youth Program”? Is there any such program substantiated in the Sunnah or in the Qur’aan or in the lives of the Salafus Saaliheen? Did they amuse their youngsters with kuffaar style merrymaking programs?

The term ‘youth’ has now acquired a pejorative hue. It portrays the desire for tashabbuh bil kuffaar. In fact, it will not be an exaggeration to say that the word ‘youth’ in these contexts has become a stupid swear-word. It portrays the brainlessness of these molvis who use this stupid kuffaar term for their programs. The word ‘youth’ is much in use in kuffar forums. Now Muslims too, due to their bootlicking disease, deem in honourable to employ this term and to lick the boots of even their youngsters to create stupid name and fame – to show that they are moving with the times – the times of the kuffaar. Women’s empowerment and youth programmes are among the salient features of today’s atheist kuffaar. The bootlicking Muslims are also insanely aping the ways and styles of the kuffaar in all spheres of life.

“Youth” is silliness and deprecated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) who said:

“The best of your youngmen are those who emulate oldmen, and the worst of your oldmen are those who emulate your youngmen.”

The teaching of Islam is to emulate pious oldmen, not act like the mad, fussaaq, fujjaar youth of today. The molvis too are using the ‘youth’ for despicable nafsaani motives.

Far from understanding even the very rudiments of Islaah-e-Nafs, these camping and merrymaking haraam programs only aggravate nafsaaniyat. Islaah of the nafs is acquired only in the suhbat of the Saaliheen, not in stupid merrymaking camping programs graced by molvis who have lost the Path of Jannat.

And what is so ‘special’ about the ‘lecture program’ of the molvi who will be giving his talk to the morons? The molvi should examine himself to understand the special nafsaaniyat which motivated him to participate in the stupid, silly, haraam merrymaking camping ‘youth’ program organized by the miscreant management of the madrasah.

While Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) ordered sleep or ibaadat after Isha, forbidding unnecessary conversation, the molvis of the merrymaking camping are training the youngsters to do the exact opposite. After Isha’ they will be engaging in laughter, joking, and stupidity in general. It will be just eating and indulging in merrymaking. And such is not meant for those who have any understanding of the imminence of Maut, the torments of the Qabar and the horrors of Qiyaamah.

To crown the villainy of the merrymaking, they have a R50 haraam fee for participating in nafsaaniyat. Shame yourselves! You are a disgrace to Islam!

24 Safar 1444 – 21 September 2022

Ibn Al-Jawzi’s Warning on the Great Trap

By Abu Dhar -September 18, 2022

بِسْمِ اللهِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْمِ

Introduction

Praise be to الله‎ (Allah), Lord of the Worlds. The Hereafter is for the pious, and there is no enmity save toward the unjust. I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship save Allah alone, and I bear witness that Muhammad ﷺ is His Slave and Messenger. May Allah bless him, his pure Household, his noble Companions, and all those who follow them in goodness up to the day of Judgement.

The theme of this project, Overcoming the Devil’s Deception, is inspired by the book of Ibn Al-Jawzi (رحمه الله) which seeks to warn mankind against the plots of the devil. Identifying the evil of the devil’s plots is in turn a form of warning against them. One of these modern-day plots which are in play upon the masses is the abandonment of obtaining Islamic literature and pondering upon them. The masses now seek to gain their self-thought-sufficient Islamic knowledge through online media forms such as social media posts and brief clips that are forwarded without verification or from unfit “compassionate imam” simps. The first book that will be covered in this project will be Sincere Counsel to the Seekers of Sacred Knowledge by Ibn al-Jawzi.

RELATED: The Severity of Selling Out Dīn for Worldly Gain

We need to present Islamic literature to the masses even by summarizing chapters and concepts from well-known books authored by our amazing Islamic scholars of the past (may Allah have mercy on them). This is with the hope of presenting authentic Islamic knowledge from legitimate sources, directly from the books (which anybody can go back and verify) for example, to the masses and in a way that is both understandable and practical. Within these posts, we will share quotes from scholars and other books as deemed fit when summarizing and perhaps some commentary (if a modern-day issue that a concept in the text has a solution for, etc).

Allah has bestowed upon us His Mercy and Kindness by sending His Messenger Muhammad ﷺ and His Message as the final heavenly message. He has sent this Message pure and complete. No one, except the deviated people, could be diverted from it. He has promised happiness in this world and in the Hereafter for the followers of His Shariʹah—those who have fully appreciated its value and devoted themselves to conveying it in accordance with Allahʹs Wishes and the guidance of His Messenger. Allah has called them His friends and party. He has also promised misery and degradation for those who have deviated from His Shariʹah and His Right path. He has called them the friends and party of Satan. (Excerpt from Al-Wala’ Wa ‘l-Bara’, Vol.1)

RELATED: The ‘Ulamā’ Are Like the Stars

اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ عِلْمٍ لَا يَنْفَعُ وَمِنْ قَلْبٍ لَا يَخْشَعُ وَمِنْ نَفْسٍ ‏لَا تَشْبَعُ ‏ ‏وَمِنْ دَعْوَةٍ لَا يُسْتَجَابُ لَهَا‏

I also ask Allah that He accept this humble effort from me and make it of benefit to my brothers and sisters in Islam.

“Our Rabb! Punish us not if we forget or fall into error, our Rabb! Lay not on us a burden like that which You did lay on those before us (Jews and Christians); our Rabb! Put not on us a burden greater than we have the strength to bear. Pardon us and grant us Forgiveness. Have mercy on us. You are our Mawla (Patron, Supporter, and Protector, etc.) and give us victory over the disbelieving people.” (Qur’an, 2:286)

Encouragement and Intimidation Prior to This Beneficial Exhortation

“You should know, my son, may Allah guide you to what is right, that man has been distinguished by intellect only so that he would act according to it. Bring it to the fore, use it in contemplation and spend time alone with yourself. You will conclude that you are a created being who has responsibilities and obligations and that the two angles are counting your every word and glance. Every breath is a step closer to our death. The time we spend in this world is short, the tie we are held in our graves is long, and the punishment for following our base desires is calamitous.”

This is from the first paragraph of this opening book. The last sentence, from a concerned father to his son, is a dire warning that all of us can take heed of. If you ever take a walk through a cemetery, whether of Muslims or of Kuffar, then you will undoubtedly notice the difference in the ages of those who have passed away. Consider your own age and see where it is that you fit in on the ground that you walk upon, and know that one day it will be your body laying beneath the earth.

RELATED: Life After Death According to Science?

“Where Is the delight of yesterday? It has departed leaving only regret in its wake. Where Is the soul’s desire? How many has it brought low, how many has it caused to slip and falter? People have only attained happiness by going against their lusts and desires. People have only become wretched by giving preference to the life of this world. Learn from the lives of the kings and ascetics: where is the delight of the kings and where is the weariness of the ascetics? The only thing left is the abundant reward and beautiful mention for the pious, and malicious words and calamitous punishment for the disobedient. It is as if those who starved never starved and those who ate to their fill never did so. Laziness in virtuous deeds is an evil companion indeed, and love of comfort causes regret greater than any enjoyment. So take heed and tire yourself for your self.”

The message here is very clear. Relative to this is the statement of Umar ibn Al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him):

“Bring yourself to account before you are taken to account; weigh your deeds before your deeds are weighed.” (Igathat al-Lahfan)

Have you taken the things you had done yesterday into account? Or have you forgotten and disregarded it all for it to possibly be placed on your scale of deeds as something bad?

What are your priorities? Is it this life or the next life? Islam is a way of life. Do you take care to ensure your lifestyle is in accordance with what Islam says or are you negligent?

People are asleep, and only when they enter their graves will they have a harsh awakening and regret their carefree slumber. Take heed and learn about the hereafter, whether through a series of lectures or via books. There are many books on this topic.

“Know, that performing the obligatory and avoiding the forbidden is a must; whenever a person transgresses the limits let him beware of the Fire. Then know that aspiring to virtuous deeds is the highest goal of those who strive yet virtuous deeds vary in status and ranks; some people consider them to mean abstaining from worldly vanities and others think they stand for dedicating oneself for worship. The truth, however, is that complete virtue is nothing but joining knowledge with action. When these two are combined they raise a person the level of truly knowing the Creator, Exalted and Most High, causing him to love, fear, and yearn for Him. That is the true goal. People also vary in determination: not everybody who wants is wanted and not everybody who seeks finds what he is looking for. Still, everyone must strive to reach their goals because “Everyone is eased towards what he is created for.”

Much of the Muslim masses today lack knowledge of what is obligatory and what is forbidden, which is why you see them wandering around like sheep. There is no desire within them to change or to learn the haqq (truth). If we desire to remain like sheep and continue acting like sheep, then we shall be skinned and slaughtered like sheep too.

RELATED: Reasons for the Current Miserable State and Life of Man

It is necessary for the scholars who have the knowledge to act upon that knowledge too, for abandoning action while having knowledge is like a body without a soul.

We must strive to learn the basics of Islam and our aqidah (creed) as Muslims—as taught to the noble prophetic companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and passed down faithfully throughout the generations until this day—so that we may fulfill our purpose and the honorable position bestowed upon us by Allah as the best of creation.

“And [know that] I have not created [either] jinn or human beings [for any other purpose] but to [know and] worship Me [alone].” (Qur’an, 51:56)

And ultimately Allah is the source of all help.

RELATED: Who Is Allah?

MuslimSkeptic

Unfit Imams Attack Muslim Marriage – Their New Strategy

By Daniel Haqiqatjou -August 28, 2022

Unfit and incompetent Imams are spreading a new type of deviance. They are encouraging Muslim women to force men to sign contracts before marriage vowing not to marry additional wives and to grant divorce upon the woman’s request.
No Muslim man should agree to such stipulations. The fact that she would propose such things is a red flag indicating that this is a person who doesn’t care to follow the rulings of Islam.
The fact is, marriage in Islam does not grant equal power and authority to husband and wife (nor does it require equal responsibility).
But feminists want to nullify this Allah-ordained imbalance in power by creating these kinds of pre-nikah stipulations in the marriage contract.
RELATED: The Muslim Marriage Crisis: Diagnosis and Prognosis
This is because they are not satisfied with the ruling of Allah and they desire to change this sacred institution of marriage in the image of feminism.
These imams will defend themselves by saying, “But this type of stipulation is allowed in some schools of fiqh.” Ok, if such stipulations can be made, then maybe Muslim women should also sign binding contracts pre-nikah that they will forego secularized court systems if there is any problems in the marriage. And they will accept the minimum mahr. And they will not fight for custody of children in case of divorce. And… and…
Would any of these feminists agree to that?
The problem is, even if she does agree, no secular court will uphold such a contract. This is because the secular court systems severely disadvantage men as far as family law, divorce, and custody are concerned. This is the oppressive reality, and many Muslim women take advantage of this while disregarding the Sharia and basic Islamic ethics.
Unfit imams are so ignorant about this oppressive reality that they want to go even further and make sure to destroy even the last-remaining vestiges of privileges that Islamic marriage gives to men. They think that they know better than Allah and His Messenger ﷺ.
These are the kinds of things that are destroying marriage for the Muslim community today. Let’s not forget the role of Unfit Imams.
RELATED: How To Be a Good Muslim Wife
MuslimSkeptic

“Difaaul Ulama International” STUPIDITY OF A STUPID BUNCH

?????????????????????????

“Difaaul Ulama International”

THE STUPIDITY OF A STUPID BUNCH OF YELLOW-LIVERED ANTI-HAQ COWARDS

In a purportedly ‘open letter’ addressed to Maulana Abdul Hamid Saheb, Principal of Darul Uloom Azaadville, an anonymous NNB jamiat clique of a couple of cowards dubbing themselves Difaaul Ulama International, proffer an array of stupid and spurious claims in their tirade of baseless criticism againt Maulana Abdul Hamid in particular, and against the Ulama-e-Haq in general.

While this miserable, unknown group of miscreant molvis dub themselves with a high-sounding epithet, they portray manifest cowardice by not providing even an e-mail. What type of ‘international’ ulama entity can this group of epistasis and infosoria wallowing in their decadent infusions of fisq, fujoor, bid’ah and kufr be the cowards, while presenting grandiose stupidities, display their abject fear the Haq by seeking refuge in a fortress of total anonymity, failing to provide even an e-mail. The morons state in their stupid article:

“We, the members of Difaaul Ulama International…….” If you morons are an ‘international gang of ulama’, who are they? You cowards have made an assault against Maulana Abdul Hamid. You mention his name and you proffer spurious and stupid arguments to assail his Shar’i stances, yet you conceal your names and your fear for the clobbering rebuffs of the Haqq which has constrained you to slink in the darkness of an anonymity of a cowardly kind. An ‘international conglomerate of ulama’, but not even an e-mail!!! This by itself is indicative of your baatil and jahaalat.

Let us now commence the demolition of the spurious and stupid arguments of this miserable gang of miscreants.

Mufti Taqi is their primary patron and leader in fisq, fujoor and haraam. The first point in the stupid litany of the stupid miscreants is their defense of Mufti Taqi.

We say with emphasis that Mufti Taqi has deviated from Siraatul Mustaqeem in a variety of ways. Most certainly he is in a head-on-clash with his noble father, Hadhrat Mufti Muhammad Shafi (Rahmatullah alayh). Taqi Sahib’s halaalization of pictography is a total rejection of Mufti Shafi by Taqi Sahib. The technical arguments of the difference in the methods of producing pictures is spurious and stupid. It is a satanic inspiration urinated into Taqi Sahib’s brains by Iblees. Even a child laughs and mocks at the stupid arguments proffered in condonation of the method of digital production of pictures.

This article is not for presenting the arguments of the Haq against the stupidities of Taqi Sahib and his cronies. Several booklets and articles have been published in which every moronic technicality and spurious ‘daleel’ of Taqi has been thoroughly demolished. These booklets are available. In brief, his claim that a digital picture is not a haraam picture is a stupid, shaitaani idolum whispered into his mind by shaitaan.

Taqi Sahib, in addition to his kufr of halaalizing haraam pictures, is guilty of fisq and fujoor. His embrace of and subservience to the kuffaar riba capitalist bankers have completely deranged his brains. He thus comes within the purview of the Qur’aanic Aayat which states that those who deal in riba “stand like one who has been driven to madness by the touch of shaitaan (Takhabbutush Shaitaan)”.

Taqi Sahib has brought disgrace to himself and to the Deen by bootlicking the riba capitalists for the dollars. He is one of the prime scholars for dollars. The lucre and boodle are the primary concerns of all scholars for dollars whose primary job is to churn out fatwas of jawaaz (permissibility) for the haraam products of the capitalist riba-guzzling bankers. His embrace of the capitalist bankers whose products he legalizes in lieu of the tens of thousands of dollars on the basis of a garble of spurious interpretations of the masaa-il, in particular of the Maaliki Math-hab, designed as cover for his haraam legalizations, added to his halaalization of pictography, nails him securely to the gibbet of takfeer. Ulama-e-Haqq readily understand the gibberish and rubbish of his spurious “dalaa-il”.

His brazen and blatant participation in the fisq and kufr Independence Day celebrations of Napakistan and his flagrant violation of hijaab by conversing with a kaafirah journalist are some of the facets which confirm his fisq and fujoor.

His emulous imitation of the West is more than adequately displayed at his madrasah where he has abolished the Sunnah style of eating and the Sunnah style of teaching the Kutub of the Deen in the manner we have inherited from the Salafus Saaliheen. His daarul hadith class has been converted into a stupid and laughable circus. It is a circus because despite his emulous attempts to cloak the madrasah with the nonsense he has observed in Oxford or Cambridge, he has miserably failed to accord dignity to his daarul hadith. It should be understood that while ‘nonsense’ is befitting for Oxford and Cambridge, and while nonsense does bestow a mundane dignity to these kuffaar institutions, it brings nothing but disgrace and stupidity to Muslims who bootlick and follow the Yahood and Nasaara right into “the lizard’s hole”.

Whatever Maulana Abdul Hamid said regarding the prohibition of digital picture-making and his comments on Taqi Sahib are 100% correct. Most certainly there is no view of permissibility. Those who claim permissibility for haraam pictography which includes the digital form, are not of the Ulama-e-Haq. They are of the ulama-e-soo’, hence their spurious, nafsaani views are of absolutely no Shar’i purport. Most certainly they are guilty of a major crime akin to kufr. Yes, they all are fussaaq. Yes, it is correct that they should resort to Taubah and publicly issue retractions of their corrupt, haraam, baatil views.

In their nonsensical article, the morons of this stupid ‘international’ body of phantoms ask: “Those Ulama and ministers of Islamic Governments (e.g. the leaders of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan) that appear on YouTube and other channels to defend Islam and Muslims – are we to say that, according to Molana’s Bayaan, they all are perpetrators of Haraam and are Faasiq and Faajir?”

There is absolutely no conundrum on this score. Most certainly they all are FUSSAAQ and FUJJAAR. Furthermore, the morons of this phantom entity have no idea of the meaning of an Islamic Government. Today there is not a single Islamic government on earth. All governments of all Muslim countries with the single exception of the Taliban, are not only faasiq and faajir. They are KUFFAAR. They have abolished the Shariah. How can they be ‘Islamic Governments’ as claimed by the clique of moron NNB scoundrels parading under the fiction of difaaul ulama international.

While the Taliban have as yet not entered into the domain of kufr by abolishing the Shariah, it is also among the bootlickers of the kuffaar. The Taliban too are confirmed fussaaq and kuffaar. Their bootlicking the kuffaar has driven them into the camp of the fussaaq and fujjaar. They have betrayed Islam and the Ummah. They have betrayed Allah Ta’ala and Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). There is no gainsaying in this incontrovertible fact and reality which stares us all in the face. Only those who opt for deliberate blindness in their pursuit of worldly objectives will deny this reality.

The difference which the Ulama-e-Haq have with the likes of Taqi Saheb are not of the category known as Ijtihaadi. The views of Taqi Sahib and his likes on this issue are tantamount to kufr. Their view is the product of deliberate convolution of the brains, which has dumped them into a cesspool of iniquity comprising of fisq, fujoor and kufr. The degree of desensitization of their Imaan has made their glaring facets of fisq and fujoor impalpable for them. They brains are clogged and blocked, hence they fail to see the glaring kufr of their kufr view. All their spurious arguments are bereft of Shar’i substance. Bootlickers always philander with Iblees. This is the effect of the circumfluence of the filth of western liberalism whose every facet of life is being incorporated into Muslim society on the basis of the baseless arguments presented by the bootlicking ulama-e-soo’ with its incremental membership of reverends of the munaafiq category.

The miserable ‘international’ conglomerate of morons mentions ‘Islamic Governments’ and gives as an example Afghanistan. Should we momentarily assume that the government in Afghanistan is Islamic (although this is not the factual reality), which other Muslim land has an Islamic government? The morons have claimed that there are such governments. Who are they? Where are they? Which Muslim country today has a government which governs by the Shariah? It is a monstrous and a satanic LIE to utter the notoriety of the existence of an Islamic Government in any Muslim country today. Every government in every Muslim country is the arch enemy of Islam. The entire Shariah has been abolished. All of them are confirmed kuffaar and murtaddeen.

Yes, most certainly, the Aayat of the Qur’aan Majeed: “Do not confuse the Haq with baatil”, does apply to Taqi Sahib and to all other modernist members of the ulama-e-soo’ clique. The reverends in this group are adept in the satanic art known as Talbeesul Iblees.

The morons wish Muslims to believe that Taqi Sahib and others of his liberal ilk are ‘mujtahids’. This is indeed a laughable stupidity of extreme absurdity.

The age of the Mujtahideen has terminated many many centuries ago. Informing us of the ending of the age of the Mujtahideen, our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“Verily, the noblest of you are my Sahaabah; then those after them (the Taabieen); then those after them (the Tabe-e-Taabieen). Thereafter KIZB (falsehood/lies) will become prevalent.”

Thus, the cut-off date for Ijtihaad and the repositories of Ijtihaad, i.e. the Ammah Mujtahideen, has coincided with the termination of the era of Khairul Quroon. Moron, maajin muftis and so-called ‘grand muftis’ of this age do not measure up to the toes of the Aimmah Mujtahideen. They feature nowhere within the scope of the first six classes of Ulama delineated by Allaamah Shaami (Rahmatullah alayh). Yes, they fit snugly in the category called Haatibul Lail, i.e. they gather firewood during an intensely dark night in a dense and dark forest. They do not know whether their hands fall on snakes or excreta. Many of their fatwas portray putrid socialism and stark superficiality.

The morons have mentioned the name of Mufti Saeed Palanpuri (Rahmatullah alayh) in a stupid bid to eke out support for their disgorgement of tripe and trash. One year prior to his demise, Mufti Palanpuri was in Port Elizabeth. Commenting disdainfully about the state of Daarul Ifta of Deoband where he was a senior Mufti, he personally said to this writer that he has to contend with eight Muftis before he issues a fatwa. He added: “Aap to azaad he” (You are free.) Expressing agreement with our views and stances, Mufti Palanpuri (Rahmatullah alayh) implied that he was not entirely free to issue fatwa as he desired.

Furthermore, this writer heard personally from Hadhrat Masihullah (Rahmatullah alayh) about 45 years ago during his (this writer’s) student days that maudoodi’ism had crept into some Ustaadhs of Darul Uloom Deoband. Thus we do not suffer from the malady of deglutition of the fatwas churned out by the darul iftas of this era. Every fatwa prior to acceptance is subjected to scrutiny and examination for determining its Shar’i worth.

Now remains the age of moron molvis in pursuit of pecuniary gain. The corrupt view of Taqi Sahib and of others of the same liberal breed is the effect of corrupt objectives. Their views of liberalism are devoid of Shar’i substance.

The attempt to differentiate between a picture produced by the camera and a video picture, and on this hallucinated basis to issue the fatwa of permissibility for the latter, speaks volumes for the shaitaaniyat and nafsaaniyat of these miscreant muftis who have deviated very far from Siraatul Mustaqeem. They are scoundrels who have opened numerous avenues of fitnah and fasaad with their haraam narratives and their excretion of haraam fatwas. They are the scoundrel muftis who have embedded cellphone fisq, fujoor and pornography in the masses. They have opened colossal avenues of immorality with their haraam digital pictography fatwa.

Any mufti and any daarul ifta of any Madrasah, including Daarul Uloom Deoband, who condones the haraam pictures produced by the digital method, are followers of Iblees. They need to depurate their brains from the evil effects of satanic sanatization. Iblees ‘sanatizes’ human brains with his urine. According to the Hadith, Iblees is capable of urinating in the ears of people. Allaamah Abdul Wahhaab Sha’raani (Rahmatullah alayh) claimed that he had once observed the urine of Iblees physically dripping from the ears of a mureed who had overslept and missed Fajr Salaat. Thus, Iblees deranges the brains of these liberal molvis with his urine. That is why, they are so stupid and fail to realize the manifest stupidity of their arguments presented in their abortive bid to make halaal what Allah Ta’ala has decreed to be haraam.

The entity of ‘international’ morons asks: “Have any of the senior Muftis from our Madaaris and Darul Ifta’s around the world (who regard digital photography as Haraam) – issued a Fatwa against those that regard digital photography as permissible – that they are committing an act of clear Haraam and are becoming Faasiq and Faajir?”

Let us divest the vermiculated brains of these moron chaps. Maulana Abdul Hamid and the Ulama-e-Haq in general are NOT the muqallideen of the Madaaris and Daarul Iftas of this era. What these Madaaris and Daarul Iftas churn out nowadays is suspect. Our proclamation of the Haqq is not at all reliant on the humbug of these Madaaris and Daarul Iftas. We are not their followers. In fact, the vast majority of them are astray, having deviated from the Sunnah and Siraatul Mustaqeem. Therefore, this question of the moron enity is spurious, stupid and rejected with contempt.

Digital picture-making is HARAAM just as HARAAM as any other method of producing pictures. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that pictures of animate objects are haraam. He mentioned ‘pictures’ not the method of producing pictures. Regardless of the method of production, the end product is a haraam picture. So whether a picture is drawn by hand, by a brush, made by a camera, by television, by video, by the digital method, by donkey’s tail or any other new method which science will still invent, it remains a haraam picture which may not be halaalized on the basis that the method of production did not exist during the era of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Whoever halaalizes digital pictures of animate objects is guilty of kufr, not only fisq.

Yes, it is correct that Salaat behind these fussaaq imaams is Makrooh Tahrimi. Yes, it is correct, that the testimony of such fussaaq is not admissible. The ‘international clique of morons’ proffers a list of molvis and madrasahs who indulge in videos and digital pictures, then asks if Salaat behind this array of molvis is Makrooh Tahrimi, and if yes, should Muslims stop performing Salaat behind them and the Imaams of the Haramain Shareefain?

Without doubt, Salaat behind these deviates is Makrooh Tahrimi. However, the morons should endeavour to equip themselves with better knowledge of the masaa-il. According to the Ahlus Sunnah, Salaat behind every Birr and Faajir is valid notwithstanding his fisq and fujoor. Hence although the Salaat of Fussaaq such as the Imaams in the Haramain as well as Taqi & Co., is Makrooh Tahrimi, those who have no control over the appointment of Musjid Imaams will not be perpetrating a Makrooh Tahrimi act when they perform Salaat behind the Fussaaq Imaams. Circumstances compel them to follow these Fussaaq in Salaat.

Those who appoint these Fusaaq and the Fussaaq Imaams themselves will bear the burden of their fisq. It is not permissible to abandon Jamaat Salaat on account of the fisq of the Imaam.

The Ulama-e-Haq will continue, Insha-Allah, to scream the Haqq from the rooftops regardless of the antics and tantrums of people of baatil. The moron muftis of the liberal daarul iftas of the world are all members of Dajjaal’s league. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had expressed greater fear for these miscreant molvis and sheikhs than for even Dajjaal.

Reverend Gadero (Reverend Abraham Bham) and Reverend Waandro (Reverend Solomon Rawat) of the NNB junk jamiat of Fordsburg who cherish hasad and bughd for Wifaaqul Ulama will not succeed to derail the Wifaaq with their shaitaani shenanigans.

Haqq has come and baatil has vanished, for baatil by its very nature must perish. (Qur’aan)

They should disembowel themselves of the flapdoodle idea that the view of the array of Ulama whose names they have cited has Shar’i validity. A majority does not constitute daleel in the Shariah. Their inability to present solid Shar’i dalaa-il for their repugnant views of kufr testifies to their total lack of perspicacity in the sphere of Shar’i proofs and evidences. No one is awed by the galaxy of molvis the humbug entity has cited in an abortive attempt to browbeat ignoramuses into acceptance of their stance of baatil designed to further the kufr liberalism of the deviated ‘muftis’.

23 Muharram 1444 – 22 August 2022

LISTENING TO THE TALKS OF YASMIN MOGAHEAD

BY MUFTI MOHAMMED DESAI DB

Question:-
I would like to find out if we are allowed to listen to talks by Yasmin Mogahed or read her books?
Answer:-
We don’t have much information pertaining to Yasmin Mogahed of Almaghrib Institute. However, it is quite clear from her profile that she is a modernist female who doesn’t don the Purdah, appears on You-Tube channels, and travels around the world to deliver ‘motivational lectures’ at various venues. We understand that both males are females are her audience and listen to her lectures. The above profile is sufficient to prove that she doesn’t adhere to the Shariah and, in fact, openly violates the laws of Allah and His messenger Salallahu Alaihi Wasallam. Sinning causes the heart to be blackened, and consequently the flowery and motivational words of the speaker will bear no effect whatsoever. Yes, the simple-minded audience will outwardly praise her lectures, but its effect will drive them away from Deen, instead of it bringing them closer to their Creator. She is continuously under the curse of Allah Ta’ala due to openly displaying herself in public, and over the internet.
Imaam Raaghib Isfahaani Rahimahullah has written in Mufradatul Quraan that, the curse of Allah actually means that one is distant from the mercy of Allah Ta’ala. When a person is distant from the mercy of Allah Ta’ala, they cannot be saved from the evil of the Nafs. It is only the one who is enjoying the mercy of Allah Ta’ala that will be protected from the evil of the Nafs.
When Yasmin Mogahed is deprived of the mercy of Allah Ta’ala and is spirituality dead, then how will she guide others towards Allah Ta’ala. She is, in actual fact, treading the path of misguidance and taking others in the same direction. She is just another agent of Shaytaan who is attracting the masses towards herself with her flowery words, which are actually, thorns.
When Shaytaan planned to drive Adam Alaihis Salaam out of Jannah, he attained his objective and goal by influencing Hadrat Hawa Alaihas Salaam. Similarly, on another occasion, Shaytaan passed by Ayub Alaihis Salaam (when he was inflicted with his lengthy illness) in the form of a physician. The wife of Ayub Alaihis Salaam requested him to treat her husband, to which Shaytaan replied, “I shall treat him without charging you for the treatment and medicines. However, when he is cured, I want you to say that I cured him.” She agreed to do so. When she mentioned this to Ayub Alaihis Salaam, he became angry because, accepting the condition of treatment entailed uttering words of Shirk since Allah Ta’ala is the only One Who can cure. Again, Shaytaan influenced the woman. The great Abid of the Bani Israeel whose Duas would be readily accepted in the court of Allah Ta’ala, Bal’am Bin Ba’oora, was also influenced by his wife to accept the gifts or rather bribes presented to him by the Amaaliqah people and in turn, curse Moosa Alaihis Salaam and his army. He fell prey to their request on the insistence of his wife and made Dua against the Nabi of Allah. Consequently, he was also misguided and lost all the treasures of Deen which he was blessed with, which included the ‘Ism-Aa’zam.’
Therefore, we shouldn’t be deceived by this agent of Shaytaan. The Hadith Sharif warns us, “Fear Dunya and fear (the Fitnah of) women, for verily the first Fitna of the Bani Israeel was of women.” [Muslim]
In conclusion, her programmes should not be attended, nor should she be entertained by any institute or organization, nor should one read any of her books. There is ample, authentic literature available, which have been written by our righteous and pious Ulama, which can be studied to reform our lives.
ALLAH TA’ALA KNOWS BEST!
ANSWERED BY:
Mufti Mohammed Desai
Date: 15 Muharram 1444 / 14 August 2022

The Not-So-Subtle Way Some Modern Imams Are Secularizing the Ummah

What if I told you that it is OK to drink wine in Islam as long as you believe that drinking wine is haram?

What if I told you that it is OK to engage in zina in Islam as long as you believe that zina is haram?

What if I defended these claims by saying: Actions are separate from beliefs in Islam. As long as you have the right beliefs, you can commit whatever actions you want, no problem.

You would think that I am crazy. More accurately, you would think that I am an apostate because I have invented a principle that does not exist in Islam and actually contradicts the fact that actions are indeed part of Islam.

But this is exactly what those who say we can separate morality from politics are preaching.

RELATED: [WATCH] Yasir Qadhi Responds on LGBT, Still Refuses to Say 5 Simple Words

They say that Muslims can support LGBT politically as long as they know that morally it is haram.

They say that Muslims can support unlimited abortion as long as they know that morally it is haram after 40 days.

They say that Muslims can support laws that give men and women equal inheritance as long as they know that morally, inheritance should be given based on the Quranic commands.

Etc.

The principle these imams use is: Politics are separate from morality in Islam. As long as you have the right moral beliefs, you can support whatever political positions, legal system, or government system you want, no problem.

This is what some Unfit Imams have been preaching with no shame. Where did they get this principle? They made it up! It has nothing to do with Islam and, in fact, it contradicts Islam because politics, legislation, and government are, indeed, a major part of Islam!

So we have to recognize that the people who separate religious morality from politics are nothing other than secularists.

RELATED: Secularism Is Not Neutral. It Is Suppression

They are secularists who want secularism. It doesn’t matter how many times they say they are against secularism or Islamic reform. It doesn’t matter if they dress and act like traditional imams. They are secularists.

This separation of religious morality from politics is exactly what secularized Christianity and Judaism. They are working hard to do the same with Islam. They want Muslims like you to believe that secularism is fully compatible with Islam.

That way, you will never strive for a united Ummah under a khilafa that implements the Sharia.

MuslimSkeptic