Q. I notice a growing trend among students studying in Ulooms. After becoming Aalims they pursue higher secular education, e.g. science, accounting, law. In most cases they give preference to the secular studies and the concomitant careers. Is this trend tenable in Islam?
A. They are not ‘Aalims’. They are Jaahils. These students are Signs of Qiyaamah. Among the Signs of Qiyaamah mentioned by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is that “the dunya will be pursued and acquired with the amal of the Aakhirat.” Also, a Sign is “that the knowledge of the Deen will be acquired for purposes other than the Deen.” They are the similitude of khanaazeer (pigs) mentioned by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “He (i.e. the Ustaadh) who imparts Ilm (higher Deeni Ilm) to unfit persons is like one who garlands khanaazeer with pearls, diamonds and gold.” They are vile mercenaries. They are like the disgruntled and rebellious Yahood who complained to Nabi Musaa (Alayhis salaam) about the Mann and Salwa which Allah Ta’ala daily made available for them miraculously whilst they were wandering in confusion and bewilderment, lost in the Valley of Teeh for 40 years. Instead of valuing and appreciating this food which came to them from the Heaven, they demanded lentils and onions. Hadhrat Musaa (Alayhis salaam) reprimanded them: “What! Do you want to exchange that which is best for that which is inferior?” These morons parading as Aalims, are worse than those Yahood who were tired of consuming the heavenly Mann and Salwa. These miserable molvis who should regret the day they were born, are exchanging the Deen, not food as Bani Israeel had done, for the carrion of the dunya. The Deen with its sacred Qur’aanic Ilm is a hobby for them. They are truly the khanaazeer mentioned in the Hadith.
The Curse on Those who Give Fatwa Without Proper Knowledge
Nowadays, we can witness many persons, without proper knowledge and training, giving legal verdicts (Fatwas) on numerous issues. It is one of the gravest sins and attracts the curse of the angels.
‘Ali (radyallahu ‘anhu) reported that the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said, “Whoever gives Fatwa without knowledge, the angels of the sky and those on earth curse him.” [Ibn ‘Asaakir, Tarikh Dimashq 20/52]
The place of such an imposter is Hellfire.
It was reported that the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said, “The most audacious from among you at giving verdicts will be the most hasty from among you to enter the Hellfire.” [Ad-Daarimi 1/69]
The person issuing legal verdicts without knowledge bears the sin of those following him.
Abu Hurayra (radyallahu ‘anhu) reported that the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said, “Whoever is given a Fatwa that is not based on knowledge, his sin is borne by the one who gave the Fatwa.” [Abu Dawud 3657]
Beware of those who give Fatwas on all issues without proper knowledge. In fact our pious predecessors called such a person mad.
‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ud (radyallahu ‘anhu) said, “Whoever gives Fatwa on all the questions people asked him is a mad man.” [Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr, Jaami’ Bayaan al-‘Ilm 2/154]
There is no light and easy issue in Islam. All the Masaail are important and must be given due attention.
Imam Maalik (rahimahullah) was once asked a question, to which he replied, “I do not know.” It was then said to him, ‘But the issue is a light and easy one.’ At this he became angry, then said, “There is nothing about knowledge that is light. Haven’t you heard Allah’s saying, “We will soon cast upon you a weighty word.” [Qur’an 73:6] Knowledge, all of it is weighty; especially what one will be questioned about on the Day of Judgement.” [‘Iyad, Tarteeb al-Madaarik 1/147]
The Messenger of Allah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) warned us about this situation. We are witnessing the demise of the great scholars around the world.
‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr (radyallahu ‘anhu) reported that the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said, “Verily, Allah does not withhold knowledge by snatching it away from his servants, but rather he withholds knowledge by taking the souls of scholars, until no scholar remains and people follow ignorant leaders. They are asked and they issue Fatwas without knowledge. Thus, they are astray and lead others astray.” [Al-Bukhari 100 and Muslim 2673]
‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ud (radyallahu ‘anhu), one of the greatest jurist among the Sahaba, made a somewhat similar prediction.
Ibn Mas’ud (radyallahu ‘anhu) said to the Tabi’un among his students, “You are in a time in which its scholars (Ulama) are many and its speakers are few. But after you will come a time in which its scholars are few and its speakers many.” [At-Tabarani, al-Kabeer 8066]
We end this brief article with the example of Imam Maalik (rahimahullah) showing clearly the state of a true Mufti at the time when he is being asked a question.
Imam Maalik (rahimahullah) said, “Whoever is asked about a religious matter, before responding he should imagine both Heaven and Hell before him and consider his outcome in the Hereafter. Only then should he respond.” [‘Iyad, Tarteeb al-Madaarik 1/144]
May Allah protect this Ummah from the imposters who are issuing Fatwas without proper credentials and knowledge.
[Shaykh] Ifran Nauyock Al-Kawthari Academy Mauritius
“DISEASE IS DIVERTED FROM THE MUSJID” — SO SAID RASULULLAH
(SALLALLAHU ALAYHI WASALLAM)
Question: According to a Hadith published by The Majlis, people in a Musjid are safe from contracting any disease. A Mufti says that it is possible for a disease to be contracted in a Musjid. What is the correct interpretation for the Hadith? Is the Mufti right?
The Hadith in question is: “When disease descends from the sky, it is diverted from the people of the Musaajid.”
Now, when Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that disease is diverted away from the Musjid, it is imperative for the Mufti Sahib to renew his Imaan. His implied refutation of the categorical negation of disease in the Musjid by our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is kufr. The Hadith is sufficient for us, the Mu’mineen. There is no need for lopsided interpretation to accommodate zigzag fatwas which are the inspirations of Iblees, and which are pliantly designed for acceptance by sceptic minds which incline to kufr. What the Mufti said is baseless and stems from doubt and uncertainty.
Disease descending from the sky is turned away from the Musaajid. Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said so with emphasis just as he proclaimed Laa adwaa (Disease is not contagious). This is absolute. Thus, no one will contract the disease in the Musjid as the super-munaafiqeen claim. If a musalli contracts the disease, it does not follow that he had contracted it inside the Musjid. He acquired the disease outside the Musjid by the decree of Allah Ta’ala. So if a diseased person comes to the Musjid it does not follow that he became diseased inside the Musjid. He came from outside with the disease.
There was no need for the Mufti to have embarked on his unnecessary exposition and baatil extrapolation which ostensibly is in refutation of the claim of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
Furthermore, if a munaafiq becomes afflicted with the disease in the Musjid, it simply means that Allah’s Athaab has overtaken him. There is no place for the munaafiq to hide and to save himself from Allah’s Athaab. While the descending disease dare not afflict the Mu’mineen, the munaafiq is divinely earmarked for Allah’s athaab, hence the Musjid offers no succour for him. The athaab befalling the Munaafiq in the Musjid in no way whatsoever negates the veracity of our Nabi’s categorical claim.
It is correct that the virus will not afflict one in the Musjid because Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said so. Hitherto no one has proved nor can prove that anyone contracted the covid satanism inside the Musjid.
It is incorrect to understand that the plague can enter the Musjid on account of it being a mercy and a cause for Shahaadat. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that a plague will not settle in a Musjid, and this was said bilaa tafseel. The hukm is general, without exceptions, hence may not be restricted, watered down or assailed with zigzaggery by means of personal opinion to titillate the palates of those whose Imaan is riddled with doubt and uncertainty to the degree of kufr.
There is no reason for interpreting away the clear, apparent (zaahiri) meaning of the Hadith. There is no other Hadith conflicting with this Hadith. Hence there is no need for reconciling conflicting narrations with any interpretation. If some decrepit mind conjectures some mirage of conflict based on an oblique vision of realities on the ground, then the safest for his Imaan is to hammer out an interpretation to argue away into oblivion the ostensible contradiction. But never should he resort to an interpretation which will entangle him in kufr.
Kufr has become a norm in the Ummah. There is an imperative need for extra-diligence when dealing with Ahaadith which appear contradictory to minds scarred and jarred by the flotsam of kufr spewed out by the university education. While the Qur’aan emphatically declares: “This is the Kitaab. There is not the slightest doubt in it”, the brains of Muslims of this era have become necrotized with doubts, uncertainly and even downright kufr, hence the stupid apologetic baseless interpretations in the kufr bid to appease the convoluted brains of the modernist zindeeqs such as the KUFFAAR medical doctors whose kufr, the juhhaal molvis are lapping up. Allah Ta’ala says:
“The Haqq is from your Rabb, therefore, do not become of the doubters.”
While HIZBUSH SHAITAAN, bootlicking the Atheists says that the Musjid is a ‘super-spreader” of disease, Allah Ta’ala, via His Nabi says that disease which descends from the sky is diverted away from the Musjid.
Question What is the Fatwa on selling TV’s? We always understood it to be Haraam. Please comment on the following fatwa of a mufti: “QUESTION Is it permissible for one to sell a TV? ANSWER Televisions are mainly used for the purpose of viewing Haram content. The harms of television are known to all. However, a TV does not serve a singular purpose, rather it is a multi-purpose item. It has several permissible uses such as, displaying Salah times; Deeni advices; CCTV; education. In principle, if an item has both permissible and impermissible uses, it will be permissible for one to sell it. The income from such a sale will be Halal. If the buyer uses the item for sinful activities, the seller will not be responsible if he does not employ impermissible methods to sell the TV, for example, advertising the quality of the screen and sound through animate pictures and music.” (End of fatwa) OUR COMMENT The Mufti dwells in gross error. His zig-zag fatwa is baseless. The objective of a fatwa is guidance, not misguidance. With the zig-zag fatwa the mufti aids in the commission of sin and transgression in flagrant violation of the Qur’aanic prohibition: “Do not mutually aid one another in sin and transgression.” Since this mufti has made selling televisions halaal, what is the purpose of his statement: “Televisions are mainly used for the purpose of viewing Haram content.”? It is a meaningless comment which highlights the zig-zag trajectory of today’s muftis. In view of the fact that the primary purpose of television is viewing zina, fisq and fujoor and its foundational principle is haraam pictography, the actual fatwa is that it is haraam to sell these satanic devices. It is an illustration of puerility for the mufti to introduce in his fatwa the principle pertaining to selling items which can be used for both permissible and impermissible acts. Mention of this principle is his zig-zag attempt to camouflage his egregious error. It is not like selling a knife or a gun which are primarily used for halaal purposes. Since television is primarily used for haraam, he was supposed to issue a short and crisp fatwa of hurmat (prohibition). The question pertains to television in general, and that implies television used in haraam ways for haraam purposes. The question does not pertain to monitors/screens. The questioner asks about television employed in haraam manner, that is with pictures, for haraam purposes, that is zina, porno, fisq and fujoor. No one is so stupid as to ask about permissibility of mere screens / monitors used for Salaat timetables. The mufti has degenerated into a moronic quagmire with his zig -zagging style of ‘fatwas’. Any moron can understand from the question that the person asks about pornotelevision — television displaying pictures and the deluge of filth and muck disseminated by television. While he acknowledges that television is mainly used for haraam, he issues his fatwa on something which is totally unrelated to the haraam content. Since the questioner posed his question regarding the ‘content’ which the mufti himself describes as ‘haraam content’, his fatwa of permissibility is satanically zig -zagging designed to mislead and misguide. If the device is required for a lawful purpose, the questioner would have posed the question differently. The halaal usage is the exception. Television is used for “haraam content” in 99.9% of cases. The mufti who appears to be a victim of western liberalism, viewed the question with squint eyes or in an upside down manner which obscured the reality of the hurmat, hence the zig-zag ‘halaal’ consequence. Selling television is HARAAM. The income is haraam. A glaring stupidity in the ‘fatwa’ is that the mufti has not answered the question posed to him. While the mustafti’s (the one who asked the question) question pertains to carrion, the mufti’s answer relates to halaal mutton. In other words, the mustafti’s question relates to the usual popular television depictions in which features pictures of animate objects, naked women, lewdness, immorality, fisq and fujoor. The reason why the mustafti seeks a fatwa on an issue which is conspicuously haraam, is because the ulama-e-soo’ who are stupidly understood to be ‘senior muftis’ or stupid ‘grand muftis’, have halaalized this device of Iblees. However, since the conscience of the mustafti is suffering pangs of confusion, he posed the question in an endeavour to assuage his heart which by virtue of Imaan repels baatil. Regarding the heart of the Mu’min, Rasulullah ( S a l l a l l a h u a l a y h i wasallam) said: “Sin is that which disturbs your heart.” In order to gain the correct fatwa, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) instructed the true Mu’min: “Seek a fatwa from your heart.” In this age of fisq and fujoor in which the muftis are trading the Shariah for tuppence, one has to be extremely circumspect and not hasten to seek answers from muftis. They pave the pathway of Jahannam with their corrupt and convoluted fatwas of dhalaal. The mustafti did not ask a fatwa regarding Salaat timetables or Qur’aanic Aayaat displayed on the screens of such televisions which are used for only halaal purposes. The mustafti who has more brains than most muftis, is fully aware that it will be downright stupid to ask about Salaat timetables and the like. Any moron understands what exactly the mustafti’s question is all about. But the zig zagging mufti with his zig zagging twaddle ‘daleels’, twiddles with the Deen with his silly and flaccid diversionary ‘proofs’ with which he diverts the attention from the actual question.
VARIOUS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS RELATED TO WOMEN FROM THE MAJLIS VOL 25 NO 10
Q. Is it permissible for a wife to take a job outside the home? Can the husband prevent her? A. It is not permissible for the wife to take a job outside the home even with the permission of the husband. It is not permissible for her to do any work even from home without the permission of her husband. The maintenance is the responsibility of the husband. If he provides the maintenance, and he refuses permission for his wife to work and earn even from home, then it will not be permissible for her to undertake any job even from within the precincts of the home. The husband is under Shar’i obligation to prohibit and prevent his wife from leaving the house to work or to participate in any kind of function.
Q. My husband works in an office among females who are immodestly dressed. He says that he keeps his eyes cast down. He also says that Muslim doctors and even Ulama work with women. What is the Shariah’s law in this regard? A. The doctors and even Ulama who do not observe proper Hijaab and who work with women are not the Shariah. Their activities and their mingling with women in their professions and occupations may not be presented as a valid basis. The only basis is the Shariah, not the practices of people even if they are great Ulama. If their practices are in conflict with the Shariah, it will remain haraam and not become halaal because they happen to be ‘great’ Ulama. It is not proper and not permissible for a Muslim male doctor to attend to female patients. He should divert them to female doctors. Only if there is a valid reason upheld by the Shariah may a male doctor attend to a female and vice versa. There are numerous non-Muslim female doctors who can handle Muslim female patients. A Muslim doctor is not supposed to work in a hospital where he has to incumbently interact with females. Thus, their actions are not Islamic proofs for permissibility. Your husband should himself make a sincere attempt to work elsewhere where he will not be in the company of women. He is bound to fall into the pit of zina. Shaitaan and the Nafs are deceiving him.
Q. Is it permissible to donate human milk? A. Human breast milk is haraam. Breast milk is only halaal for under two year old infants. Donating or selling human milk or any part of the human body is haraam.
Q. Will a woman be a faasiq if she does not wear niqaab? A. A woman who does not wear Niqaab in public is worse than a faasiqah. She is a faajirah (immoral).
Q. Will the wife be disobedient if she refuses to submit to her husband’s demand for oral sex? A. The one who makes such a filthy satanic demand is worse than a pig. Oral or shaitaan sex is haraam. The wife should not submit to the swine-filth of the husband. She will not be disobedient. She is under Shar’i obligation to refuse the haraam instructions and haraam lusts of her husband. How can a human being who is termed Ashraful Makhluqaat (The Noblest of Creation) descend into such depths of swine-inequity?
Q. Is marriage to a Salafi girl valid? A. Marriage with a Salafi girl is valid just as marriage with a Muslim prostitute is valid. However, such a marriage will be full of misery, hence inadvisable. There will be no compatibility and the marriage is likely to break down and end in divorce. The Deeni differences and conflicts between Salafis and the Muqallideen of the Math-habs constitute an unbridgeable chasm.
Q. Does the period of breastfeeding differ for boys and girls? A. The period of breastfeeding is two years for both boys and girls.
Q. My mother is extremely sick and complains a lot. What advice can I give her? A. Be of service to her to the best of your ability. Tell her that it comes in the Hadith that sickness is a purifier. It cleanses us from all our sins provided that we do not complain. Complaining will not cure the sickness. On the contrary the sickness will become worse. Sickness is also a ni’mat (favour) of Allah Ta’ala. He purifies us here on earth with sicknesses and other difficulties so that we can enter Jannat fully purified. Advise your mother to keep her tongue constantly engaged in Thikrullaah. Maut can come at any moment. Therefore, the tongue should always be engaged in some Thikr to ensure departure from this dunya with the Kalimah on the tongue.
Q. Is imitation jewellery permissible? A. Imitation jewellery is permissible for women except rings. Rings must be of either gold or silver.
Q. Is it proper for a man to marry a second wife only for the sake of his lust? A. Allah Ta’ala permits a man to marry four women. As far as ‘lust’ is concerned, everyone marries to satisfy his/her lust. The primary motive for marrying even one wife is to gratify lust. Initially people marry only to satisfy lust even if only one wife is taken. Allah Ta’ala has created lust in people, hence He is aware that men require more than one wife to satisfy their lust lawfully. Never voice yourself against any Law of Allah Ta’ala. Recite Istighfaar and make Taubah.
Q. Why is it not permissible for women to attend walimahs. During the time of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), they would go to walimahs. A. Just as it is not permissible for women to attend the Musjid even if there are separate entrances, so too is it forbidden for women to attend ‘walimahs’ nowadays. Furthermore, the ‘walimahs’ nowadays are farcical and bid’ah. In fact, it is not permissible for even men to attend the reception organized by the girl’s parents on the day of the Nikah. Such a reception is not the walimah. Women used to attend the Musjid for Salaat during the age of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). However, this was unanimously banned later by the Sahaabah. The same applies to walimahs and to all other merrymaking functions.
Q. How many holes may a lady pierce in her ears? A. A lady may pierce her ears only with one hole in each ear. More than one is the style of the kuffaar.
Q. My husband has cheated on me. He has struck up adulterous relationships. My heart is broken. I don’t know what to do. My health is suffering. I want to run away. Please give me some advice. A. Countless women are undergoing the same heart-breaking problems. When men lack Taqwa, they conduct themselves like atheists. They really do not believe that Allah Ta’ala is seeing them and that the Recording Angels are writing their misdeeds. However, do understand well that your broken heart is a wonderful treasure by Allah Ta’ala. Allah Ta’ala, in His Own Words, said to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam): “I am with every broken heart.” Your grief will not be in vain. You will receive immense rewards for patiently bearing the grief. Focus more on Allah Ta’ala. Do not ruin your health on account of the shenanigans of your husband. Maintain your health and use it to gain nearness to Allah Ta’ala. Increase ibaadat. Life on earth is short. It is full of trials. May Allah Ta’ala grant you strength and steadfastness on the Deen. May Allah Ta’ala guide your husband and protect you.
Q. A man has two wives. The one wife lives with him while the other wife lives in her own house about 100 kilometres away. This wife demands equal nights. What is the Shariah’s rule? A. In the scenario mentioned by you, if the wife who lives 100 kilometres away desires equal nights, then she has to reside in a house procured for her by her husband in the town where he lives. She cannot demand equal nights living in her own house 100 km from her husband.
Q. I do not allow my children to visit their grandparents – my parents and my wife’s parents. They have televisions, and in general they do not observe the rules of the Shariah such as purdah, mushtabah / haraam food, etc. They are accusing me of breaking family ties. Am I breaking family ties? A. In fact, it is not permissible to send your children to relatives who are not strict on the Deen. Refraining from sending the children does not mean that you are severing family ties. It is the Waajib obligation of parents to ensure that the Akhlaaq of their children are not compromised by relatives. Nowadays, the safest is to stay at home, and not to visit even relatives. We are trapped in an era of fitnah and fasaad. A home where the Deen is observed is a holy sanctuary visited by the Malaaikah of Rahmat. On the other hand, houses such as the homes of your parents are haunts for the shayaateen. These people lack the haziest idea of the meaning of family ties and what constitutes disruption of breaking of family ties. Furthermore, it is haraam to uphold ‘family ties’ when in conflict with the Shariah.
Q. Is there a special thikr or amal for anxiety and depression? When my evil past comes to mind, I develop anxiety and go into depression. A. When anxiety develops, do not brood on the past. Do not entertain the thought which is the cause for the anxiety. Instead, lapse into Thikrullah. Perform two raka’ts Nafl and engage in Thikrullah. Shaitaan tries to derail a person by causing anxiety in this manner. A Mu’min equipped with the weapon of Thikr does not suffer depression. Anxiety is an assault of shaitaan, and its antidote is Thikrullah. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Shaitaan sits glued on the heart of man. When he (man) makes thikr, shaitaan flees. When he (man) is oblivious (ghaafil), shaitaan casts his waswasah.”
Q. I have found out that my husband is conducting relationships with women via his cell phone. He refuses to give me the password. What should I do? A. 99% of the men of this age, including molvis and sheikhs, are involved in cellphone zina and pornography. There is nothing you will be able to do in these circumstances. Men and women are drowning in deluges of moral filth – zina and porno – of the cellphone. Little children are also addicted to this device of shaitaan. The entire Ummah across the board, is buffeted madly in this whirlpool of cellphone filth. People no longer have Imaan. They have become atheists. They are in entirety bereft of any concept of Allah’s Omnipresence. They have become munaafiqs. Whilst they blabber with their mouths about the Recording Angels, they sin flagrantly in front of these Malaaikah and with Allah Ta’ala looking at them. But since they do not really believe in the Presence of Allah Ta’ala and His Malaaikah, they sin recklessly. You can only constantly offer good advice to your husband and adopt Sabr. If you are unable to bear his evil abuse with patience then your marriage will end. Thus, your choice is between Sabr and Talaaq. Q. The separation between a husband and wife was in terms of Khula’. Is it correct that the Iddat of this woman is 30 days? A. The Iddat of a woman whether separated by Talaaq or Khula is the same. It is three haidh periods if not pregnant. If pregnant, it ends with the delivery of the child.
This British Board of Juhala (Ignoramus) ‘scholars and imams’ fabricated ten questions to which they disgorged baatil rubbish answers in conflict with the Shariah, as well as in conflict with the demand of Aqeedah (Belief). Their narrative exhibits their true motive for peddling the vaccine theory vomited into their mouths by Bill Gates and the Pharma Satanist.
It is clear from their bunkum narrative that there is a hidden, sinister agenda for underlying their advertising stunt – advertising the potion of Iblees. The satanic agenda is to promote the haraam vaccine under Shar’i guise. Hubb-e-Maal (the love for wealth) and Hubb-e-Jaah (the love for cheap name and fame) are clearly the motivating force which has blinded these juhala molvis and imams. Their spiritual blindness has induced them to become agents of Iblees and pedlars of the Pharma Satanists.
In this article we shall, Insha-Allah, briefly respond to the ghutha (rubbish flotsam) with which the gang of U.K. miscreant, bootlicking ‘scholars for dollars’ attempt to misguide the ignorant community of Muslims.
“Question: Is gelatine in vaccines ok?”
Answer: Answering their own fabricated question calculated for promoting haraam satanic vaccines, the Board of Juhala says:
“It should be noted that the currently approved COVID vaccines do not contain gelatine or any animal product.”
Firstly, the question does not pertain to vaccines. So why did this Board of Ignoramuses introduce the vaccine factor? It is not difficult to understand that their shaitaani motive is to peddle the haraam, shaitaani covid vaccine to Muslims. This board of bootlickers is in the employ of its atheist masters who are the manufacturers of the haraam vaccine.
Even if the vaccine does not contain gelatine, it does contain a host of filth, poisons and haraam substances. Furthermore, assuming that the satan’s potion does not contain any haraam ingredients, then too, the poison content and the extremely harmful health consequences render it haraam. In terms of the Shariah, vaccines are not classified as medicine. The principle of Tadaawi bil Haraam (treating sickness with haraam substances) therefore does not apply to vaccines. There is no capital for these bootlickers in this principle which they have mismanipulated in an abortive bid to halaalize the devil’s potion.
Animal gelatine is acquired from haraam animals, primarily from pigs. The argument of metamorphosis employed to halaalize such haraam gelatine is baseless.
This board of agents of Iblees casting light on their hidden agenda states:
“We are working with other organisations to make gelatine-free alternative vaccines for the seasonal flu more readily available, for those who choose to adopt the stricter position.”
This group of moron imams and scholars resembles the carrion and pork halaalizers such as SANHA and MJC. Their objective is the haraam boodle, hence haraam has to be halaalized by hook or by crook. Vaccines are filthy and dangerous poisons. The Shariah does not permit the introduction of poisons, even if of halaal substances, into the body. Vaccines are not permissible preventative measures in terms of the Shariah. The harms of vaccination have been explained and documented in thousands of pages of articles by expert western scientists and medical doctors.
Peddling the bogus covid wares of his handlers in the Pakistani government, Taqi Uthmani with regard to the hallucinated ‘second wave’, said: “Practice on all the precautions with diligence. Hospitals are full.”
What are these ‘precautions’? And, for what are the ‘precautions’? Even for genuine and valid expediencies only precautions which are lawful in the Shariah may be adopted in general while men of Taqwa have the Shar’i right to abstain from even such valid and Islamically lawful protections. Once, Ameerul Mu’mineen Umar Bin Khattaab (Radhiyallahu anhu) was severely indisposed. A Sahaabi suggested that a hakeem should be called. Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) said: “If I know that the cure for my sickness is only in lifting my hand and placing it on my head, I would desist from it.” In dismissing the suggestion to resort to medical treatment, his lofty degree of Taqwa constrained the display of this attitude of Tawakkul and Ridha. He was pleased and contented with the Will of Allah Ta’ala.
Hadhrat Junaid Baghdaadi (Rahmatullah alayh) was suffering from a severe eye problem which threatened blindness. The hakeem / doctor who examined him advised that whilst he will be under treatment, he has to abstain from applying water to his eyes thereby implying abstention from Wudhu. Hadhrat Junaid (Rahmatullah alayh) said that he was prepared to accept blindness, but not abstention from wudhu despite Tayammum being permissible in the circumstances. Thus, he refused the hakeem’s treatment.
While we lack such lofty states of Taqwa and Tawakkul, it does not follow that we have to jettison our Imaan from our hearts by submitting to the kufr of the atheists and peddled by their agents such as Taqi Uthmani and other scholars for dollars of similar ilk.
The ‘precautions’ advised by the mudhil agent of the atheists refer to the haraam covid protocols structured on the haraam basis of the kufr theory of contagion which was explicitly and emphatically refuted by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) by word and deed. Aggravating the hurmat of the conditions is the bogey of the ‘second wave’. In fact there was not even a ‘first wave’. The whole mess is a Bill Gates trillion dollar conspiracy into which he has succeeded to rope in most of the moron government officials. Taqi Uthmani and the ulama-e-soo’ cartel are all members of Hizbush Shaitaan (The Legion of Iblees), hence they lick the boots and hinds of the western atheists most obsequiously, and they do so with relish in view of the chimera of the dollars dangling infront of them.
THE DEVIL’S PRECAUTIONS
(1)The niqaab of Iblees: While Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) forbade that the face be covered during Salaat, Taqi Uthmani and the whole gamut of Hizbush Shaitaan insist on donning the niqaab of Iblees. They believing that by muzzling themselves so hideously, they will be able to thwart Allah’s decree. Even muzzled dogs present a better spectacle than those buffeted by fear into these satanic protocols of the atheists.
The Sahaabah would sharply jerk off any face-covering from the face of a musalli. Covering the face during Salaat for any reason other than the kufr theory, is haraam. But donning the hideous niqaab of Iblees on the basis of the kufr contagion theory of the atheists is kufr. It is for this reason that Salaat behind a moron imam donning the niqaab of Iblees is not valid.
Regarding the niqaab of the devil, the moron mufti asks: “What Hardship is there in wearing a mask?” We say that you, Taqi Uthmani, are either too stupid to understand the hardship involved in donning the niqaab of Iblees, or you are deliberately pretending to be oblivious of the hardship in obedience to your handlers.
Firstly, it is haraam to don the niqaab of Iblees during Salaat. Secondly, the rationale underlying the niqaab of Iblees is kufr. Thirdly, it is an imposition of corrupt, brutal mafia gangster personnel. Fourthly, it is in violation of Allah’s natural law of exhaling filth from the body. Allah Ta’ala has ordained that filthy air and menstrual blood be expelled from the body. Besides the kufr factor, inhaling and retention of filthy air and putrefied haidh blood bring in their wake diseases which have extremely harmful health consequences in the long term. While filthy air has to be incumbently expelled from the body, the devil’s niqaab constrains the diffusion of the filth into the body. All things unnatural have harmful consequences.
Fifthly, the physical discomfort caused by covering the face, especially on hot days, is a cruel hardship imposed by governments in league with Bill Gates.
The Devils’ social-distancing
Many Ahaadith explicitly inform us that the gaps between musallis in the Salaat sufoof are occupied by the shayaateen (devils). Thus, there will be a preponderance of devils in all the Musjids converted into weird temples where the satanic protocol of ‘social-distancing’ is observed. It is therefore not permissible to join a mixed congregation of humans and devils. Perform Salaat at home if a valid Jamaat is not available.
Besides the factor of devils filling the gaps, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) also mentioned that the effect of the gaps in the saff is disunity in the hearts. It causes enmity and disunity among Muslims.
The number restriction
It is haraam to debar any Muslim from entering the Musjid for Salaat. Yet, this miserable bootlicking mufti supports the protocol of the atheists limiting the number of musallis. When the protocoled number is reached, musallis are debarred entry. While this satanic restriction is haraam for all Salaat, it negates the validity of Jumuah Salaat. According to the Hanafi Math-hab, Jumuah is invalid on the basis of two evil factors: (a) The condition of Ithnul Aam is violated. (b) It is a condition structured on the basis of kufr.
Taqi Uthmani and the rest of Hizbush Shaitaan come fully within the glare of the Qur’aanic Aayat: Who is a greater zaalim than the one who prevents the Thikr of Allah’s Name from the Musaajid of Allah, and who strives to ruin the Musaajid?”
Besides the aforementioned three devilish haraam ‘precautions’ presented to Taqi Uthmani by his kuffaar handlers, there are several other haraam/kufr conditions which have been explained in many of our articles on this topic. These are available on our website.
The claim by Taqi Uthmani, viz, ‘hospitals are full’, i.e. full of covid victims, is a blatant, satanic lie. This misinformation has been fed to him by his handlers. Either Taqi is aware of the falsity of this claim or he is too dim in the brains to understand and to ascertain the misinformation which has been disgorged into his mouth. A Brother from Karachi, Pakistan, commenting on the rubbish excreted by Taqi Uthmani writes:
“Last night my uncle let me listen to mufti Taqi’s recent audio on corona. Thereafter we called a hospital. We ascertained that they were not filled as mentioned by mufti Taqi in his speech. I have ascertained from other hospitals as well and have realized the gross amount of exaggeration by him.”
Many people from U.K. and other countries have informed us of similar blatantly false claims of hospitals overrun with corona patients.
Rasulullah’s Warning for Muslims
Hadhrat Abu Tharr (Radhiyallahu anhu) narrates: “Once I was walking with Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), and he said: ‘Besides Dajjaal something is more fearful for my Ummah.” He mentioned this statement thrice. I (Abu Tharr) said: “O Rasulullah! What is this which causes you greater fear for your Ummah than even Dajjaal?” Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: ‘Aimmah Mudhilleen!”
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had a greater fear for the Aimmah Mudhilleen than for even Dajjaal. The gravest danger for the Ummah is the Aimmah Mudhilleen. They are the scholars for dollars –the ulama-e-soo’ – who misguide and mislead the Ummah with their corrupt, baatil, zigzag fatwas. And, they do so for worldly, monetary, mercenary and nafsaani objectives.
Q. I find most Ulama are vague when responding to questions. The answers do not clarify the issues. Due to such vagueness, laymen find much scope for committing sins. Also, the teachings of the Deen are watered down by the vagueness of the responses. Is this proper? Please comment.
A. The ‘vagueness’ of the answers of the molvis/muftis is due to their forked-tongues which they employ to promote their nafsaaniyat and baatil. Some are complete supporters of baatil while others are fencesitters who do not want to annoy donors. But all are promoters of baatil and concealers of the Haqq. That is why they speak dubiously. In the words of the Qur’aan Majeed: “They are neither here nor there. They vacillate between this (with doubt and uncertainty between truth and falsehood).” In fact the vagueness is understood to mean “perfect permissibility” and that there is nothing wrong with indulgence in the act.
With dubious statements of this nature, the molvis create the evil condition of Istikhfaaf in the minds of laymen. The ahkaam, are viewed with insignificance and regarded unimportant because of the dubious ‘hikmah’ (misplaced and stupid ‘wisdom’). The forked-tongue answers of most muftis of this era are nafsaani motivation. Since they themselves indulge in such practices or they do not want to annoy donors, they issue dubious and vague fatwas.
When a molvi’s brains are convoluted by shaitaan, then in the words of the Qur’aan Majeed, he blunders with shaitaani intoxication. In this regard, the Qur’aan Majeed states:
“Those who devour riba do not stand except as one who has been afflicted by the touch of shaitaan stands. That is because they say that trade is like riba whilst Allah has made halaal trade and made haraam riba.”
Although the specific circumstance for the revelation of this Aayat is the prohibition of riba, it has a general application. Those who halaalize any of Allah’s prohibitions come within the scope of this Qur’aanic stricture.
The niqaab of Iblees, i.e. the covid mask designed, advised and forced by the atheists and the enemies of Allah Ta’ala, is haraam. Even a face covering not designed by the kuffaar and not accompanied by the kufr contagious belief, and not donned to bootlick the kuffaar, is haraam to wear during Salaat. That is, a man may not cover his face with any cloth or garment whilst performing Salaat. There is specific Nass on this prohibition.
The UK molvi, most ludicrously, stupidly and satanically elevates the haraam niqaab of Iblees to the stature of Sunnah. He disgorges the follow kufr effluvium:
“The blessed Sunnah of the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wasallam was that whenever he would wear something (clothes, shoes etc) he would start from the right. And when he would remove something he would remove the left side ﬁrst.
For example when he sallallahu alayhi wasallam would wear footwear he would wear the right ﬁrst and then the left. And when removing he would remove the left ﬁrst and then the right.
Yesterday our respected Shaykh, Mawlana Muhammad Saleem Dhorat Saheb haﬁzahullah mentioned nowadays we are constantly a wearing the face mask. When wearing the mask we should tie the rightstrap ﬁrst (behind the ear) and then the left. And when removing the mask we should remove the left strap ﬁrst thereafter the right strap and whilst doing this a person should make the intention of acting upon the blessed sunnah. We are wearing and removing the mask multiple times in a day. Like this imagine how much reward we can reap in one day.”
(End of the molvi’s kufr rubbish)
“Like this”, those who don the niqaab of Iblees should imagine how much Wrath and La’nat of Allah Ta’ala settle on them in one day. The molvi has gone haywire with his kufr. Shaitaan has indeed “driven him to madness with his touch” as is mentioned in the aforementioned Qur’aanic Aayat. Satanism has blinded the eyes of his heart. He has sunk deep into the gutter of kufr by promoting the niqaab of Iblees and by elevating it to the status of Sunnah.
It is prohibited (Makrooh Tahrimi) to cover the face during Salaat because of the Hadith of Abu Hurairah (Radhiyallahu anhu): ‘Verily Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) forbade that the musalli covers his face…….
He prohibited talath-thum in Salaat. (Talath-thum: i.e. covering the face with a veil), and in it tashabbuh (emulation) of the Majoos during their worshipping the fire.”
The mushrik Majoos (Fire-Worshippers) don the niqaab of Iblees when they worship the fire. Today molvis are promoting this face-covering of the devil and even elevating it to the status of the Sunnah during Salaat. The molvi’s rubbish kufr advice is in stark conflict and denial of the prohibition proclaimed by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
“Imaam Maalik (Rahmatullah alayh) narrates from Abdur Rahmaan Bin Al-Mujeer that he saw Saalim Bin Abdullah who would forcefully rip off the cloth (the veil/face-covering) from the face of a person performing Salaat.”
“Imaam Abu Hanifah (Rahmatullah alayh) narrated that Ibraahim (Nakh’i) regarded as Makrooh that a man covers his face in Salaat, and he (also) regarded as Makrooh that a woman performs Salaat with a face covered with niqaab.”
“Ibraaheem Nakh’i said: It is Makrroh that he (the musalli) covers his face. Imaam Muhammad said: ‘This is our view. We also regard as Makrooh that he covers his nose. And this is the view of Abu Hanifah (Rahmatullah alayh).
The molvi’s advice is clearly kufr. He has implied by his satanic advice his rejection of the prohibition stated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). This rejection is tantamount to kufr.
“Salaam on those who follow the huda of Allah”
The advice given by this molvi has been satanically calculated to convey the absolutely baatil idea of the niqaab of Iblees being permissible, hence the aadaab pertaining to other permissible acts should be extended to this haraam act as well. This stupid haraam advice is similar to saying that when eating pork or carrion one should commence with Bismillaah and eat with the right hand. It is similar to advising men to bestow the Masnoon Aadaab of dressing even if they clothe themselves with female garments or the type of garments which are the styles of immoral fussaaq and fujjaar. The elevation of a kufr act to the level of Sunnah is itself kufr.
UK WIFAAQUL ULAMA, NNB JAMIAT (FORDSBURG), MJC (CAPE TOWN), TAQI UTHMANI, REVEREND ABRAHAM BHAM, TAHA KARAAN, MENK AND OTHERS OF HIZBUSH SHAITAAN (THE LEGION OF IBLEES) ARE ALL PART OF
A Brother from U.K. writes:
ANGLICIZATION OF UK MAULVIS
Anglicization of UK Maulvis
‘They have taken their scholars and monks for lords beside Allah Ta’ala.’ (Glorious Qur’an, 9:31)
Rasoolullah sallallahu alayhi wasallam stated, ‘Your leaders are a reflection of your deeds.’
It is the incumbent duty of every Muslims to consider all developments in life with an unbiased approach in light of the Moral Code of Glorious Qur’an, Hadeeth, Fiqh and rulings/ethos of our Salf-Saaliheen. In this context, many of the recent fatwas of UK Darul Iftaa’s are found wanting, mind-boggling, embarrassing, weird and way short of the high standards and Maslak of our Akabireen rahmatullahi alayhim and Darul Uloom Doband. The entire edifice and modus operandi of UK Muftis/Maulvis, Madaris, Tableegh Jamaat and Khanqaahs now reeks of bootlicking and appeasement to atheist and the apparently wealthy – just like the Ulama of Banu Isra’eel:
Recently, the call of UK Muftis for Masajid Closures, before the UK Government had announced closure for places of worship; secondly, their diktats for Madaris to unnecessarily close – at a time when schools continued to operate but local authorities and public health bodies transgressed beyond their remit to cajole these Chaplains to transfer onto online teaching and now, thirdly, the ultimate act of folly – for many Darul Ifta’s to quite unnecessarily legitimise, approve and promote the glut of Covid-19 Vaccines that have miraculously mushroomed.
What doubt is there in the haram nature of all these vaccines? For those enamoured with foreign ways, there is ample scientific/medical evidence published by even Western scientists to show the harms of almost all vaccines. It is palpably naïve and downright foolish, nay stupid in the extreme, to expect these multi-national pharmaceutical companies to release the exact ingredients of their vaccines – which by their own standards have not been tested or monitored over the usual period of time and have already proven to be fatal, with documented casualties.
A former (sic) UK Mufti, to pull wool over the eyes of lay people, has even allegorised the use of vaccines to the Sunnah act of cupping. This is sheer lunacy and blasphemy. In cupping, an impure substance (foul blood) is removed from the body – whilst in vaccination, impurities and a concoction of dangerous elements are introduced into the body. The same former Mufti even has the temerity to argue, ‘We don’t understand from where they got the details of the ingredients. The manufacturers have not yet given the details. How did the Mufti Saheb come to know of the contents?’ By his own admission, he does not have the ingredients (nobody does – they are commercial secret’s – government regulations are wildly flouted because these very pharmaceuticals have paid parliamentarians to enact ‘exemption laws’ granting them protection from liability). When the norm is for non-Muslim businesses and kufr entities to incline towards impurity (napaaki), then the de-facto response must be to assume they contain impure substance, unless we have 100% reliable information otherwise.
For UK Maulvis/Muftis to keep quoting the Korangi Mufti is disingenuous and paradoxically they are the ones bringing his name into disrepute. Recent example of well documented glaring errors by Darul Uloom Korangi include:
Granting Permissibility to Mastooraat to travel overseas without a Sharee Mahram. To legitimise TV and participate in chat shows with non-mahram presenters. To approve Riba-based Yahoodi Arabian finance by branding it as Islamic. To approve and undertake those practices which are in diametric conflict with the Sunnah of Rasoolullah sallallahu alayhi wasallam, the Sahabah radhiyallahu anhum and generations of Akabireen, for example, eating off tables-chairs in their Madrasah.
Let us return to the shenanigans of UK Maulvis. Notice how they are silent and in tacit agreement to the removal of the Glorious Quran from our Masajid – yet dubious magazines and leaflets bearing names of these celebrity shaykhs are still promoted and distributed whilst the Qalaam of Allah Ta’ala is somehow to be viewed with trepidation and removed from public viewing – lest a reader catches something.
Our cartel of UK Maulvis proclaim blind observance (taqleed) of all such measures, even describing them as Waajib (compulsory), whereas some of these measures are not even mandatory – merely guidelines.
Which UK law says it is compulsory to close Ablution Areas and Toilets?
Which UK law says we must have ‘crosses’ marked on the Masjid Carpet?
Which UK law said we have to close down our Madaris – when UK Schools, Shops and a host of other Out-Of-School-Settings may continue to operate?
How many of the other UK laws do these Maulvis/Masjid Committees/Trustees adhere to?
Are they just as law-abiding when it comes to money-laundering, benefit claims, free medical prescriptions, regular overseas first-class trips, charity regulations, tax-returns, H&S, building and fire regulations, payment to staff/employees, etc, etc?
Are cash collections, gifts and payments to these visiting Shaykh’s declared?
When such glaring errors are highlighted – when their image of infallibility is rent asunder – their lackeys, bootlickers and hangers-on are the first to take umbrage and disparage the voice of Haqq.
Anti-Vax, anti-ulama, fitna-mongers, conspiracy theorists, extremists and a host of vitriolic hot-air is fired-back in an attempt to create a smoke-screen from the real issues – which is bootlicking of atheists and wanton disregard of the rulings of Deen. Why do these UK Maulvis/Muftis not respond to these charges with Sharee Daleel? Why do they hide behind the Korangi Mufti’s?
They, like the Bani Israeel Ulama before, use Deeni terms and names of globe-trotting Maulvis to befool a gullible public, dilute and water down Deeni Commands and serve the agendas of their atheist financiers. Servitude to the wealthy and atheist has so convoluted their brains, despite Deeni Maloomaat – they are no longer able to guide the Muslim Ummah.
Despite these Maulvis spending from 6-10 years in Madrassah, the majority graduate as incompetent, unable to undertake further in-depth study, research or commit themselves to teaching or any other service of Deen without perks. Almost all are drowned in love of this world (hubb-e-dunya); we are not talking about a reasonable residence, income, car and phone – their sights are now on mansions, executive cars, multiple holidays, latest mobile gadgets in multiple numbers and regular consumption of take-away junk. Attend any Masjid in a locality in UK synonymous with a large number of Huffaz/ Maulvis, one will be fortunate to observe a single other person from this profession besides the paid Imam.
Should all the blame go to the Maulvis? No, they are merely a reflection of the misdeeds of UK Muslims.
‘And do not barter my signs for a paltry price and take protection in Me alone. And do not mix truth and falsehood and do not knowingly hide the truth.’ (Glorious Qur’an, 2:42-43) (End of article)
THEY ARE ANGLICIZED AND SATANIZED!
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“The Saalihoon are departing (from this world in quick succession, one after the other. Then will remain only hufaalah (i.e. rubbish/flotsam/muck) such as the chaf of dates or barley. Allah will have no care whatsoever for them.”
Now there remain only the juhhaal who are “the worst of people under the canopy of the sky. From them emerge fitnah and the fitnah will rebound on them.” (Hadith)