THE TREACHERY OF JAMIATUR RASHEED

Posted on by alfaida

PICTURES

THE TREACHERY OF JAMIATUR RASHEED

A Brother from Pakistan says:

“I met a senior ustad from Jamiatur Rasheed who is teaching Mishkaat there. He asked me what is my problem with Jamia. 

I said the first problem is making pictures halaal. You used to criticize Arab Ulama saying that they don’t have any ilm and depth of ilm, hence they make pictures halaal. Then 10-15 years later you do not make pictures only halaal, but you make them farz. So the first problem is, you don’t have any consistency. Secondly, if you truly believe that pictures are halaal then again, why should I follow or trust someone who got on the train after 10 to 15 years. It shows some serious lack of ilmi depth from you people that it takes you 20-25 years to make something halaal that Arab Ulama had made halaal 30 years ago. (I don’t trust any of them, this was just for the sake of argument).

(Our comment: Yes, they suffer from the maladies of hubb-e-jah and hubb-e-maal. The object is to please the masses and to gain name and fame for the gratification of nafsaani demands. This is the basis for their inconsistency. Their current view of permissibility is not based on any valid Shar’i daleel.

 If an Aalim retracts his earlier view on the basis of valid Daleel of the Shariah, he shall be lauded for his honesty and humility. But these liberal characters such as the treacherous molvis of Jamiatur Rasheed and Taqi Sahib present silly arguments devoid of Shar’i substance to bamboozle the masses and to exhibit academic prowess when in reality a mediocre student of Deen understands the drivel of their flapdoodle averment that a picture is not a picture when the method of production changes. Indeed there is divinely cast rijs (filth) on their brains, hence they utter such flaccid and absurd arguments. About this rijs which has deranged their intellectual balance, the Qur’aan Majeed states: “Allah casts rijs on (the brains) of those who do not understand.”)

You believe and think that deen is spreading through youtube and facebook but you fail to understand that actually Islam is becoming a joke because of these videos. The same people who subscribe to your channels will subscribe to some singer then some filmstar then some comedian. They will be drinking tea and listening to your bayaan and immediately thereafter they will be watching movies on the same youtube or listening to a song. 

(Our comment: They are indeed making a mockery of themselves by exhibiting their snouts on these shaitaani media. The Deen has become a joke and a ball to be kicked about at the behest of the nafs. It is about these youtube and facebook molvis and maaajin muftis that on the Day of Qiyaamah, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) will complain to Allah Ta’ala: “O My Rabb! These people have taken the Qur’aan as an object of rebuff (to kick around like a ball).”

He said this is right but firstly hundreds of ulama of Pakistan have agreed to media. You are going against all of them. How can you say they are wrong?

(Our comment: Even if all the ulama of the world today agree on the permissibility of interest, liquor and pork, such satanic ‘unanimity’ shall be refuted with the contempt it deserves. It shall be said that these louts are kuffaar and they come within the purview of the prediction of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) who said that “a time will dawn when the worst of the people under the canopy of the sky will be the ulama.”

 Thus, the hundreds of molvis of Pakistan and of other places who justify digital pictography on the basis of Taqi’s absurdity, are all morons. Their stupid fatwas are rejected as effects of nafsaaniyat inspired by Iblees. Indeed they all are wrong. Even a layman who “seeks a fatwa from his heart” as commanded by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) understands the glaring incongruency, stupidity and satanism of this extremely absurd and ludicrous idea of a picture not being a picture if produced by means of the camera and video.

Secondly, if we did not come on media, the people who are going astray because of baatil people being on media will lose their Imaan. At least we are saving their imaan. Ok they are watching movies etc but in the least we are saving their imaan.

(Our comment: A person’s Imaan cannever be saved by means of haraam – by means of an institution which is mal-oon and on which is the Wrath of Allah Azza Wa Jal. Imaan is the product of Hidaayat of Allah Ta’ala. It is NEVER the effect of haraam, immorality and the obscenities which are displayed in deluges on these satanic media.

Far from people gaining hidaayat and their Imaan being saved by these haraam media, the stupid molvis appearing on these mal-oon haraam media lose their Imaan and resort to kufr justification of their haraam concepts designed to boost their ego. Their evil objective is nothing but the insane craving for name, fame and the haraam boodle which comes in the wake of these evils. Ignorant Muslims, fussaaq and fujjaar, who watch the youtube and facebook filth and pornography do not lose their Imaan because they are 100% convinced of the evil and sin of their own perpetration. They watch the filth and evil for nafsaani gratification. They are like people who commit fornication. They understand that they are sinning and they may gain taufeeq for Taubah.

But these rubbish molvis and maajin muftis who make halaal the evil which Allah Ta’ala has made haraam are deprived of taufeeq for making Taubah because they claim that their evil and sins are halaal.

Thirdly, you should at least accept that through media an alim’s voice is heard by millions. Then he gave example of a mufti who is khalifah of Hakeem Akhtar (Rahmatullah alayh). He said right now only a hundred people hear his voice. If he comes on media millions will listen to his voice. Wouldnt that be a great work of deen.

(Our comment: Since the fellow has introduced Hakeem Akhtar into this haraam picture, it may be salubrious for him to be informed of the comments of Hakim Akhtar Sahib regarding these satanic media such as TV, youtube, facebook, etc. In fact, he likened TV to faeces.

Hadhrat Maulana Akhtar Sahib (Rahmatullah alayh) had delivered a bayaan in a Musjid in Dubai. Some employees of Sharjah TV were also present at the bayaan. After the bayaan they commented that if Hadhrat Akhtar appeared on Sharjah TV, numerous people will come close to Allah Ta’ala and even embrace Islam. The khaadim conveyed this message and request of Sharjah TV to Hadhrat Akhtar. Hadhrat responded as follows:

“Ask them that if there is a spoon fitted with diamonds worth millions of rupees, and their aunt cleans the faeces of her child with this spoon, then cleans the spoon, then presents a dish of porridge to you to eat with this spoon, would you eat it?”

The Sharjah TV employees said: ‘No!’ Hadhrat Akhtar commented: “How can I appear on TV on which they teach adultery, shamelessness, obscenity, eloping from home, court marriages, obscene dances, shameless dresses, theft, alcoholism and addiction. We are the followers of such Akaabir who do not watch even Hajj or any religious programs on TV.

TV is a device of sin. It will destroy our children. Our Deen is not dependent on any media.”

(End of Hadhrat Hakeem Akhtar’s comments)

Always remember that the Objective is Ridha-Ilaahi (The Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala), not the pleasure of millions of people. Regardless of the millions of people who view pornography and indulge in zina of the eyes, mind and heart – zina in which these satanic media excel, the objective must not be lost. We are here on earth for a temporary sojourn to cultivate the Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala, and this is possible only by means of Taa-at (Obedience to Him). His Pleasure cannever be achieved by means of Haraam.

The corruption of the brains and hearts of these vile molvis and maajin muftis is self-evident from their inability to understand that indulgence in Haraam is not among the ways of the Sunnah for gaining the Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala. Such indulgence is a snare of Iblees who adorns his traps with zukhruful qawl – arguments and ideas presented in ‘deeni’ guise to destroy Imaan.

 So even if you believe that pictures are not allowed, you should not criticize those who believe it to be jaiz. You should appreciate that they are doing a lot of work of deen. Even if their ijtihad is wrong they will be rewarded. 

(Our comment: It is Waajib to criticize and lambast these mudhilleen whom Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) feared “more than Dajjaal”. They mislead the Ummah with their satanic ideas and stupid arguments. Shaitaan also does a lot of work. With their haraam they are aiding and abetting Iblees in his plot to scuttle the Shariah. How can they not be criticized when they claim that pork and faeces are halaal? We are not of the ilk of the Yahood who “took as gods their molvis and buzrugs”.

The ‘reward’ for halaalizing clear-cut haraam is Jahannam. Their ‘ijtihaad’ is shaitaani ijtihaad.

I then asked him about the hadith that ulama will be the worst of creatures under the sky and from them will emerge fitnahs and in them they will return. I asked him, surely we are living in those times. Can you tell me what those fitnahs are? If all the ulama are rightly guided and ma’joor (rewarded) by Allah because of their ijtihad, then what are those fitnahs? (The moron had no valid explanation since he is part of the fitan mentioned in the Hadith).

 I don’t understand how can the majority ulama of Pakistan, or of the world make something halaal when it’s haraam and then they use the hadith that my ummat will not unite on dalalah (deviation). Please explain.

(Our comment: Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) referred to the Ijma’ of the Ulama-e-Haqq, not to the absurdities of hufaalah (rubbish) who resort to glaring rendition of haraam into halaal. Furthermore, even in this era of fitnah, there are numerous Ulama who reject the claim of these molvis who have halaalized pictures. The moron ustaadh said ‘the ulama of Pakistan”. Did he undertake a survey? There are thousands or tens of thousands of molvis in Pakistan. Innumerable of these Ulama believe that pictures of all kinds are haraam. The molvi’s claim is bereft of valid basis. And, even if the majority is united on Haraam as it will be in the eras in close proximity to Qiyaamah as predicted by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Qur’aan Majeed states: “If you follow the majority, you will be misled.” In this dunya the majority always consists of the followers of Iblees. The majority is not a daleel of the Shariah. Any view which is in conflict with the Nusoos of the Shariah are rejected and mal-oon.

9 Zul Qa’dah 1444 – 30 May 2023

THE SHAITAANI SAGA OF MOLVI AZMI AND HIS SCOUNDREL KHALIFAH

Posted on by alfaida

THE SHAITAANI SAGA OF MOLVI AZMI AND HIS SCOUNDREL KHALIFAH
A MOTHER’S LAMENT AND TEARS AND CURSE

The following is the verbatim lament of a Kenyan mother whose daughter has been betwitched and maddened by the devil Arif, khalifah of Molvi Azmi, a so-called ‘shaikhul hadith’.

“Assalamu alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu.

I am a mother to one of Arif’smureedas. My daughter, despite all the outcry, refused to see his reality and is completely controlled by him. When we approached her lastin 2022, she used to say “do you know better thenHazratmoulanaFazlurRahman sahib? If Arif was wrong he would have informed us”.

With new evidence that has surfaced, that moulanaFazlurRahmanwas informed about the murder and some of Arifs evil since may 2021, I write the following letter:

Dear MoulanaFazlurRahman,

You think you are doing us a favour by removing Arifskhilafah?. We are not in need of your favours,we have seen the outcome of those. We are here for our rights. You always talk about “hubbejah”, now Allah is testing you to see if you love yourself more or if you will make amends for your mistakes. So far you have chosehubbejah, by trying to open new alim classes in hopes of maintaining your shaikul hadith title, without making any effort to amend your mistakes. How will that help you in the hereafter when you have helped and knowingly aided someone to misguide so many and do so much zulm since 2021? What effort have you made to try and guide those people you helped misguide? You were informed of arifs evil and the murder before he was even exposed to the Kenyan public.

My daughter and many others, kept following Arif because you showed your support. Since then have you called any of them to explain to them you made a mistake and Arif is wrong and misguiding them? Dont think that they hear your audio and believe that you have dropped him. In that audio you curse the muslims of kenya more then you do Arif. You make yourself seem like your the victim.

Do my tears not matter to you? Do the tears of other mothers,whom you have helped oppress, not matter to you? Do you not fear Allah? You had enough evidence to remove your endorsement and warn the people not to follow him, why didnt you? Why did you ignore everyone’s calls, pleas and messages? Why didnt you investigate the matter? When the kenyanulema spoke out against arif why did you oppose them?Why didnt you support them? When people came to see you regarding this matter why did you ignore them? What made you re-endorse him in september after knowing everything? I had messaged you with pleas and begging for your help. Yet like others you did not respond. Yet you were responding to arifs cries of help. Why? Ready to respond to the zalim but not the mazloom? Was this the behaviour of nabisallahiualihiwassalaam? Is this what Islam teaches? Is this what you intend to teach future students in your darululoomna’maniyyah? You were sent statements from his ex followers confirming his evil last year(by whatsapp we have the copies), why did you ignore them? You knew everything, yet you kept on endorsing him, that makes you a guilty party in all this. Even if you feel vindicated from all this, which you are not, am sure you want to do the work of dawah, why not start by calling those people you helped misguide and give them dawah. What is stopping you from picking up your phone and calling my daughter and others, and explaining to them arifs evil and misguidance? Remember, Allah knows everything, and He is slowly exposing what you knew and when you knew it, as well as your involvement. It’s better that before Allah exposes more, and more people start speaking out, you fulfil your obligations by making an effort of righting your wrongs.

I am completely heartbroken for having lost my daughter and my grandson. Am not even 100% sure where she is and how she is. I wouldn’t wish this pain upon any mother, especially it happening in the name of deen. Its sad that the person who helped Arif and who has the power to try and convince my daughter, is a well known and recognised shaikul Hadith and refuses to do anything. He travels the world trying to do the work of Islam, yet the people he has hurt he does not care about. I pray daily for their well-being but I am angry also, angry that the demon is still out there, still in a position to influence others, still in a position to steal other children away from their families. My curse is upon MoulanaFazlurrahman until he fulfils his islamic duty and makes an effort to right the wrongs he did. I encourage other women like myself to speak out and dont be scared, let the world know how a great shaikul Hadith has mistreated us. We are ready to present ourselves via voice call to any qadhi he wishes.

Jazakallahukhairun

Walaikumus salaam warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu.”

1 Zul Qa’dah 1444 – 22 May 2023

Aseem Al-Hakeem

Posted on by alfaida

Question:-
I believe Sheikh Assim Al-Hakeem will visit our shores soon. Personally, I don’t watch videos, but I have been told by others about the views expressed by him. I am not comfortable with the views expressed by this person but Mufti Sahib can kindly enlighten us. Should people attend the talks of this Sheikh or refrain? I’m not sure about his Aqeedah which may be misleading.

Answer:-
We are not fully aware of the Sheikh in question. His website states that he studied at King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah and Umm-al-Qura University in Makkah. He appears on two television channels, which is Haraam for any Muslim, and is a presenter on a radio station. He enjoys a good relationship with other Salafi leaders and has studied in Salafi institutes. It is highly possible that we would differ with him in matters of Aqeedah.

Secondly, from some of his posts on the internet, we understand that he is quite liberal in his rulings. He permits females to utilise nail polish during their menses which is a Kuffar custom. He states that it is superior to recite Quraan Sharif from memory rather than reciting from the Mushaf, which is contrary to the teachings of the Hadith Sharif. It is recorded in Shuabul Imaan of Baihaqi, that Hadrat Uthmaan Bin Abdullah Bin Aus Thaqafi reports from his grandfather that Rasulullah Salallahu Alaihi Wasallam said, “Reciting the Quraan from memory is equal to a thousand rewards, and reciting while looking into the Quraan increases it to two thousand.” [Fadhaa’il-e-Aa’maal Pg.344 Virtues of the noble Quraan] In a query posed to him by a female, saying that she doesn’t love her husband, he responds by saying, “Technically, if you unable to live with him or fulfil his rights, then you can divorce him,” whereas a female is unable to divorce in Islam. It is evident from the above that we would differ with him in various matters.

We, therefore, advise the Muslims to refrain from attending his lectures during his visit to South Africa, as he will cause more confusion in the Ummah. Again, there are many knowledgeable and righteous Ulama in our country who are worthy of being followed. May Allah Ta’ala guide us all. Ameen!

ALLAH TA’ALA KNOWS BEST!

ANSWERED BY:

Mufti Mohammed Desai

Date: 19 Shawwal 1444 / 10 May 2023

PROHIBITION OF PICTURESTHE ISSUE IS NOT THE METHOD OF MAKING PICTURES

Posted on by alfaida

PROHIBITION OF PICTURES

Posted on 

PROHIBITION OF PICTURES

THE ISSUE IS NOT THE METHOD OF MAKING PICTURES NOR THE OBSCURE DIFFERENCE OF OPINION

Question

Many Ulama of Deoband are nowadays saying that digital pictures are not the prohibited pictures mentioned in the Hadith. Although this does not seem to be correct, why do they differentiate between pictures on the basis of methods of production?

Muftī ‘Abū al-Qāsim Nu’mānī is the Shaykh al-Hadīth of Deoband. He also served as Muhtamim from 2011 to 2020, where after he was appointed to his current post. He’s been part of Dār al-‘Ulūm’s Majlis-e-Shūra since 1992.

One of my former colleagues in New York, an Imām and Mudarris, is Bayt to him. He had studied under Muftī ‘Abū al-Qāsim in Deoband and professed strong love for him. Yet despite his Shaykh’s well-known antipathy for photography, this colleague had an incorrigible habit of indulging in the same. He photographed and videoed students at the request of his employer, posed for others when they requested to film or photograph him, and freely watched YouTube, etc. as a pastime. I believe his admiration for Muftī Taqī Usmānī – which he expressed to me several times – helped him justify such behavior.

The situation eventually deteriorated to the extent that advertisers featuring him and Maktab children were being printed out and left inside the Musalla itself. The egregiousness of defiling a place of worship with Harām Tasāwīr was entirely lost on him. At this juncture I stopped addressing him as “Mawlana”, “Huzūr”, etc. in our personal interactions and when mentioning him to others. I resolved to write to Muftī ‘Abū al-Qāsim about this Murīd and request his intervention. A few recent discoveries have eliminated that resolve, however.

I was searching for an audio declamation against photography from Muftī ‘Abū al-Qāsim. I wanted to forward it to my colleague by way of admonition, but in the process I found that Muftī ‘Abū al-Qāsim has also started to appear on video and television. Strangely enough, he still maintains that digital photography is impermissible and vehemently criticizes those that indulge in it in his presence.

In a recent function he publicly and severely upbraided a person who had taken his photograph whilst he was giving or about to give a talk. For about seven minutes thereafter he solemnly spoke about the sin of photography and expounded on its punishment in the Ākhirah. And yet, at the very same time he was inveighing against photography, he was being filmed at close-range by multiple handheld and mounted cameras. Many onlookers and YouTube viewers were left either bemused or amused by the situation. One of the latter mockingly commented that, “Bayaan aapka kisme record hora rahe? Mufti sahab aasmaan se farishto se mangway kiya camera?”.Another said, “Photo grafi haraam hai- maolana video grafi sunnat hai, ya sawab hai? Mufti sahab zara wazaahat karden”.

Besides the aforementioned video, there’s quite a few more which are widely available on the internet. Some show him tying turbans at a Dastarbandī ceremony. In others he’s delivering a bayān, and several have him discussing local politics with TV reporters. In these circumstances, when the Pīr himself is publicly committing the same infractions, what use is it to try to get him to redress the shenanigans of his Murīdīn?

Also worth mentioning is that the current Muhtamim of Dār al-‘Ulūm, Syed Mawlānā Arshad Madanī, is himself better known as ‘media personality’ to many people in and outside of India who’re unacquainted with Deoband. As the Amīr of Jāmiāt-e-‘Ulamā-e-Hind, he’s seemingly incapable of fulfilling his duties without being on TV and other types of video broadcasts. In fact, the broader Madanī family, with the apparent blessings of Mawlānā Arshad, have inaugurated a media platform called “Madanī TV.”

(End of the Brother’s letter)

ANSWER

The deviate molvis have kicked up much dust and churned up much hot air by presenting the red herring of the method of production and difference of opinion regarding the prohibition. Bereft of any valid argument to bolster their baseless claim of permissibility, they present two flaccid and flapdoodle stupid arguments to scuttle the Prohibition of pictures of animate objects.

  • They say that while a picture drawn with pen and paint is a prohibited picture, the picture produced by the camera and the digital method is not a picture.
  • There is difference of opinion regarding the prohibition.

We as well as other Ulama have thoroughly debunked these stupid arguments which are bereft of any logic and sense. There are many publications in refutation of their absurd claim of a digital picture not being a picture. Furthermore, there is complete Consensus of all our Akaabir Ulama on the Prohibition of pictures of animate objects. Then the strongest Dalaail for the Prohibition are the Ahaadith which unequivocally prohibit and condemn pictures.

This, our present discussion, will not repeat the valid arguments in refutation of the stupidities of the deviates. Let us look at this issue from another perspective, and that is the evil, the sin and the moral filth and destruction caused to the Ummah by pictures. Assuming that digital pictures are not pictures within the purview of the prohibition of pictures stated in the Hadith, then too, it is absolutely satanic and villainous to justify such pictures in view of the evil which these pictures generate.

Only sincerity is required to understand this perspective. A vast satanic avenue of immorality and obscenity has been opened by digital pictography which the likes of Mr.Taqi Usmani has halaalized. The vast majority of the Ummah has become addicted to cellphone and video pornography, haraam movies and filth of a variety of kinds. Innumerable illicit relationships have been struck up via cellphone communication. In every such evil relationship, males and females mutually exchange pictures of themselves in various postures of nudity and zina.

The addiction to pictures has ruined the Akhlaaq of the Ummah. This addiction has created a complete desensitization regarding sins of the zina dimension. On the basis of the justification and promotion of the hallucinated permissibility of digital pictography, the addiction stemming from it has completely diluted and even eliminated inhibition for sins of zina committed on these satanic devices. No longer are there any pangs of conscience for the deluge of zina sins committed by Muslims in the wake of the halaalization of digital pictography by deviates about whom Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“I fear most for my Ummah such aimmah who are mudhillen.”

The ‘aimmah’ are the deviate, evil scholars for dollars who pursue worldly and nafsaani objectives under deeni cover. They are labelled ‘mudhilleen’ for they mislead the ignorant Muslim masses. They lead them into the den of vice and satanism. Those who argue against the Prohibition of pictures are perfect examples of aimmah mudhilleen.

Viewing this picture issue from the perspective of the irreparable moral and Imaani damage it has caused the vast majority of the Ummah who has become addicted to cellphone zina and pornography, and which has caused the breakdown of innumerable marriages, there is no need to delve into the issue of prohibition or permissibility of pictures.

Every molvi of mediocre qualification is aware or should be aware of the simple Fiqhi principle of Hurmat li ghairihi. While something may be lawful per se, evil and harmful external factors becoming attached to the lawful practice/institution will render it (the lawful issue) haraam. Grapes are halaal. However, selling grapes to a winery is Haraam Lighairihi. Anything which causes haraam is likewise haraam.

There is no honest and sincere Muslim who will deny the colossal harm and damage to Akhlaaq and Imaan caused by pictures – digital pictures – even if we have to momentarily and stupidly insult our intelligence with the shaitaani idea that digital pictures are not pictures. The stupid and absurd argument of digital pictures not being pictures and the alleged difference of opinion are of no significance in the context of the Prohibition of cellphone and video pictures based on digital pictography. Setting aside this redherring argument, the evil and immorality stemming from these supposedly permissible pictures should be the primary grounds for Prohibition just as the winery is the primary factor of prohibition of selling grapes.

These vile molvis and moron muftis who have ruined the Ummah shall still have to circumambulate their own intestines in Jahannam. They have legalized the abhorrent institution of pictography only to gratify their nafsaani and lustful desires. They crave to display their snouts on the social media. It is the villainous nafs which goads them to recklessly perpetrate the capital sin of halaalizing a practice which Allah Ta’ala has made Haraam and for which many severe warnings of punishment have been sounded in the Hadith.

The following Naseehat of Hadhraq Mufti Muhammad Shafi’ (Rahmatullah alayh) should be salubrious for the cliques of aimmah mudhilleen.

“In the authentic Ahadith it is reported that the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

‘There will be people in my Ummat, who will change the name of wine (giving it some other fancy name) and consume it. And, at these drinking sessions music, singing and dancing, will prevail. Allah Ta’ala will cause them to be swallowed into the earth, and others among them will be transformed into apes and swines.”’

This practice (of changing the names of forbidden things with a view to legalise them) which our Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) mentioned with regard to wine has today been employed by Muslims, not only for wine, but for many other forbidden practices. Practices which the Shariah has proscribed as Haraam (prohibited) have today been painted in the colours of modernity and their names have been changed so that people could indulge in these forbidden practices without any restraint. These people labour under the misconception that they have escaped the Divine Prosecution by employing this self-deceptive trick.

If they had any insight they would have realised that by the employment of this deception they are guilty of two crimes, i.e. (1) the commission of the sin, the name of which they have changed, and (2) being devoid of regret and shame for the crime thus perpetrated. These are such people who are forgetful of repentance.

… picture-making has been named photography and has thus been declared as lawful. … interest has been named profit, and has thus been legalized.

(My complaint is lodged with Allah Ta’ala. There is no strength and no power, but with Allah, the Great, the Majestic.)

The subject under discussion is the question of photography. This too is one of the links in that chain. Shariah has branded picture-making as an absolute prohibition, and the use of pictures as unlawful. Modern Muslims of today have camouflaged this practice with a new garb. They have turned away from the obsolete methods of picture-production and have invented a new method of picture-making, giving it a new name in order to escape the verdicts of Prohibition. In this regard there is not much complaint against the modernists who have been tutored and “nourished” in only modernity. Alas! Our complaint is against those who not only have knowledge of the Quran and Sunnah, but also venture to criticise sometimes the Aimma-e Mujtahideen (the great Jurists of Islam) and our pious Pre-decessors because they labour under the illusion of being experienced and all-wise. They have dubbed picture-making with the term photography and have issued Fatwas (verdicts) of permissibility …

These (votaries of photography) in support of their claim state:

“It seems that in the present age all the modern Ulama of enlightened opinion hold the view that photography is not picture-making, and that the term, Tasweer (picture-making) is not applicable to photography.”

“Indeed, it is astonishing to note that these very “modern” Alims of “enlightened opinion” who have shrugged off the Taqleed of the Aimma-e-Mujtahideen and the Pious Predecessors in consonance with their lowly desires are the very ones who bow their heads in submission to their contemporaries (i.e. those who have issued verdicts declaring photography of animate objects lawful).

The anarchist regards the following (Taqleed) of the great Jurists of Islam as a dark blot, and he does not hesitate to portray the opinions of the overwhelming majority of Fuqahaa (Jurists) and Muhadditheen who include many Sahabas, as erroneous. It is this type of anarchist who today desires to declare a Haraam act as Halaal with the aid of the Fatwas of a handful of contemporaries. Indeed, it is most shocking to observe that he will not even consider the opinions of Hazrat Ali (radhiyallahu anhu) and Hazrat Ibn Abbaas (radhiyallahu anhu) when these do not conform to his (the anarchist’s) fancy. But, the verdicts of a handful of contemporaries are accepted by the anarchist when these conform to his desire notwithstanding the existence of the Fatwas of thousands of Ulama which contradict him.”

Shaikh Mustufaa Humaami (Rahmatullah alayh) of Egypt writes:

“The photographers of our time regard picture-making as a great skill and as a branch of the ‘fine-arts’ . . . this means that these people regard picture-making as lawful without any qualms. Now, what does the Law state regarding a person who regards a forbidden practice as lawful, and this too, when he has knowledge of its prohibition? We seek Allah’s protection. … Alas! Muslims today have been encircled by this great evil (of photography) to such an extent that there hardly remains a Muslim home without being full with photos. Ponder! Should Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) make an appearance today and observe this evil, what will be his attitude? The great misfortune of the situation is that this fitnah (the evil of photography) prevails in those cities where the inhabitants regard themselves to excel in knowledge.”

26 Shawwaal 1444 – 17 May 2023

THE PROHIBITION OF PICTURES

Posted on by alfaida

Posted on 

THE PROHIBITION OF PICTURES

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“The worst punished on the Day of Qiyaamah will be the picture-makers.”

PICTURES – prohibited pictures – are pictures of animate objects – of people and animals. Such pictures are HARAAM, and this prohibition has been commanded by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), and it has been the well-known, unanimous position of the Shariah since the era of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

In this era in close proximity to Qiyaamah many maajin moron mufis have spuriously argued the permissibility of such pictures with the preposterously stupid reasoning that pictures produced by the camera and now the digital method are not prohibited pictures because they are not pictures. The absurdity and stupidity of this argument is self-evident. Only those who seek gratification for their nafsaani desires accept this ridiculously stupid argument.

Now another spurious argument is being advanced by some misguided muftis of Pakistan. They argue that there never was unanimity on the prohibition. They have added this spurious contention to the camera-digital argument of Mufti Taqi. In this satanic process of arguing they have merely demonstrated their ignorance and nafsaaniyat.

Pretending to be oblivious of the deluges of sin, pornography and immorality stemming from photography and digital pictography of our era this group of moron muftis struggles with reckless stupidity to abrogate the 14 century Prohibition of pictures – a prohibition of which even the blatant transgressors are aware of. But, these miscreant muftis, bending over their backs with their stupid interpretations, and displaying absolute ignorance of the evils of pictography of our era, argue satanically for permissibility.

Even if we should momentarily accept that there is a difference of opinion and that these haraam pictures are permissible, genuine Muftis will not acquit themselves with the stupidity and recklessness of these so-called Naqshabandi-Shaazali moron muftis. The minimum demand of the Shariah in the event of permissibility is to invoke the principle of Li ghairihi and to proclaim pictures HARAAM Li ghairi without elaborating to the ignorant masses the meaning of Li ghairihi.

Grapes are a wonderful bounty of Allah Ta’ala. But will it be permissible to sell grapes specifically for the manufacture of liquor? The Ummah has been ruined by immorality and pornography of pictures. Every moron today, even small children, are in possession of cellphones which have become devices of Iblees. The morals of the entire Ummah lay in filth and the stench of pornography and immorality all based on pictography – the digital pictography which the moron clique of muftis has laboured painfully and abortively to prove permissibility.

Intelligence and Imaan demand that all avenues of sin and immorality be closed. It is the obligation of a genuine Mufti to bring Muslims closer to Allah Ta’ala, not to drive a wedge and create a chasm to separate them from Allah Ta’ala. Just what business do these wayward muftis have with legalizing a practice which has become the basis for such deluges of evil and filth in which the Ummah is drowning? The Imaan and Akhlaaq of nations have been ruined and destroyed by the digital pictography which these reckless clique of muftis as well as mufti Taqi has satanically halaalized on the basis of the most spurious arguments which portray the evil in their hearts and the convolution of their brains.

Download booklet

THE REMAINDER IS THE HUFAALAH – FLOTSAM AND JETSAM

Posted on by alfaida

THE REMAINDER IS THE HUFAALAH – FLOTSAM AND JETSAM

Hadhrat Maulana Ahraf Ali Thanvi (Rahmatullah alayh) commenting on the Shaan (Dignity, Status and Splendour) of the Ulama-e-Haqq of his time, said:

“The Shaan of all our Buzrugs was incomparable and unique. In even their seemingly insignificant words there was Noor. It was indeed a wonderful and an astonishing era.

Eyes are now searching for (the likes) of our Buzrugs. From the latter part of 1295 Hijri until 1297 Hijri numerous Buzrugs had departed (from this dunya). Maulana Ahmad Ali Saahib, Molvi Ghauth Ali Saahib, Maulana Muhammad Qaasim Saahib, Maulana Abdul Hayy Saahib, etc. (Rahmatullah alayhim) have departed. But now, the field is totally barren.”

“The field is now totally barren”: That was almost one and a half centuries ago. While for us non-entities with our smattering of knowledge and spiritual bankruptcy, it was still an age in which there were numerous Ulama-e-Haqq and genuine Mashaaikh and Auliya to whom we refer to as ‘our Akaabir’, in the estimate of Hadhrat Thanvi (Rahmatullah alayh), the world was barren. All the Ulama-e-haqq, Kaamil Mashaaikh and genuine Auliya had left the Dunya.

In his lament, Hadhrat Thanvi (Rahmatullah alayh) was merely echoing very feebly and mildly the harsh acquittal of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) on the very same issue. In this regard, our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“The Saalihoon are departing (swiftly, one after the other. Then will remain only the HUFAALAH such as the chaff of barley or wheat. Allah will have no concern whatsoever for them.”

Hufaalah: In the context of the Hadith it means flotsam, jetsam, rubbish, dirt and waste matter. It refers to the scoundrel ulama-e-soo’ – to those who masquerade as reformers of the Deen and leaders of the community – to the munaafiqoon who dig the foundations of the Deen in deeni guise – to the bogus sheikhs of fake sufi’ism operating bogus khaanqas such as the khaanqah in Lenasia.

In another Hadith Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) described future Muslims, in general, as GHUTHA:

“Then a time will dawn…when you will be GHUTHA (RUBBISH) such as the ghutha of floodwaters. Allah will eliminate fear for you from the hearts of your enemies, and He will cast WAHAN in your hearts.”

A Sahaabi asked for the meaning of wahan. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Love for the dunya and aversion for Maut.”

These are the diseases of Muslims, of the so-called ulama, buzrugs and the masses, hence there is no surprise in the calamties settling on the Ummah. The humiliation which Muslim bootlickers of the kuffaar suffer under the grinding and crushing boots of the kuffaar is a fitting punishment of Allah Azza Wa Jal for us. The Yahood and Nasaara are not blameworthy for the so-called ‘zulm’ in Palestine, Kashmir, Syria, Iraq, etc., etc. They are merely small cogs in the Divine Scheme of Allah Azza Wa Jal. It is He Who has harnessed his kuffaar servants to mete out the appropriate compensation to Muslims for their treachery.

When the world was barren of Ulama-e-Haqq and genuine Buzrugs even 150 years ago, what shall we understand and conclude from the RUBBISH who parade themselves as ulama today? In this class of HUFAALAH predicted by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are the likes of Reverend Abraham Bham, Menk, Solly Ravat, Solly Moolla, Khataani, MJC carrion halaalizers, SANHA carrion molvis, Taqi the riba and picture-halaalizer, almost all the sheikhs and molvis of madaaris and Deeni institutions, Tabligh Jamaat molvis, etc., etc.

We are in the age described by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as the ‘forlorn era’:

“Islam commenced forlorn (without friend and helper). Soon will it return to the state it was when it had begun. Therefore, congratulations for the Ghuraba.”

The ‘Ghuraba’ are the small group of Ulama-e-Haqq and those Muslims who hold aloft the Standard of Haqq, fighting the moron hordes of savages of baatil and satanism. They cling to the Haqq most tenaciously. We are in the age about which Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“Then there shall dawn an age when the one who holds on to the Sunnah will be like one who holds on to a burning coal.”

About this tiny group of the Haqq, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“There will ever remain a (tiny) group of my Ummah fighting on the Haqq until the Day of Qiyaamah. Those who oppose them or who do not aid them will not be able to harm them.”

4 Shawwaal 1444 – 25 April 2023

JAIL FOR THE IMMORAL PHILANDERING MOLVIS

Posted on by alfaida

UK SHAITAANI SAGA

DISGRACE AND JAIL FOR THE IMMORAL PHILANDERING MOLVIS

Currently in the UK, a senior Mufti is facing imprisonment for sexual misdemeanours, and so are  many other so-called ‘elders’ of the UK community.

The Molvi profession in UK is at pains to present these court cases and the prison and disgrace consequences as persecution of the molvis. In futile attempts to vindicate the fisq and fujoor of the molvis facing impending imprisonment, some molvis are comparing the scenario with our illustrious Fuqaha and Auliya of former centuries who were persecuted, tortured and imprisoned for upholding the Standard of Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahy Anil Munkar.

A Brother from UK discussing this issue, comments as follows:

Traitors are punished upon hands of Traitors

‘Those of the BaniIsra’eel who went astray were cursed by the tongue of (Sayidduna) Dawood (alayhis salam), and of Sayidduna ‘Esa-ibn-Maryam (alayhis salam). This was because they rebelled and used to transgress. They restrained not one another from the wickedness they did. Verily evil was what they used to do!’ (Glorious Qur’an)

Currently in UK, the Muslim Community is facing a very disturbing situation, where numerous Muslims are facing imprisonment on alleged misdemeanour charges and the Halal Certificate racket is imploding.

Instead of addressing fundamental flaws collectively in our conduct, UK Muslims are going to some trouble to live in denial and paint prison sentences as draconian, racist, Islamophobic and staggeringly as a similar tribulation to those experienced by Akabir Ulama Haqq (rahimahullah) for their stance on AmrBilMa’aroofNahi Anil Munkar. Some scholars are even preposterously equating these court-cases to the slander against Umm ulMu’mineenAishahSiddeeqaradhiyallahu anha.

This analogy is totally incorrect and displays lack of moral values, duplicity, deceitful judgment, ignorance, and highlights how low we have fallen and how easily people are manipulated by bootlicking celebrity ministers of religion who are openly indulging in gerrymandering. Another glaring error, especially coming from scholars, is how many are forwarding same message (shown in adjacent screenshot); minus the correct titles and salutations before and after each of these illustrious personalities.

The alleged charge here in UK is one of sexual misdemeanour with juniors; not the proclamation of Nahi Anil Munkar.

Ulama in UK are not willing to court the displeasure of Ulama-soo and correct the record:

ShaykhSufyan al-Thawri rahmatullahi alayh and Imam Abu Haneefah rahmatullahi alayh were flogged and poisoned because they refused to accept the Qadhi’s post offered by a Khaleefah.

Imam Ahmad ibn Hambal rahmatullahi alayh faced house imprisonment, dislocation of his shoulders, flogging and brutal torture because of his stand regarding the Glorious Qur’an.

Imam Bukhari rahmatullahi alayh had to leave because of enmity of other scholars.

Imam Malik rahmatullahi alayh was flogged for his support to the Ahl-e-Bayt radhiyallahu anhum.

Shaykh Saeedibn al-Mussayibrahmatullahi alayh also refused to bootlick  the Khaleefah.

Imam al-Shafi’Irahmatullahi alayh was chained and dragged to Raqqa from Yemen for his stand on Haqq.

Irrespective of whatever time span has passed, the Commands (ahqam) of Glorious Qur’an were revealed 1450 years ago – so there is no excuse or any valid defence for any Muslim male to be teaching or be alone with any Muslim girl-young lady in privacy anywhere, anytime, or anyplace.

Moreover, it is well known and documented, all our Akabir Asaatizaah and Elders (rahmatullahialayhim) had warned their students repeatedly and especially upon graduation not to ever allow themselves to be in any position of loneliness-privacy with not only a non-mahram, but also young male students; whereby anybody may ever cast aspersions. These elders have now passed away; yet their warning and foreboding have materialised.

It gets worse. Some others in UK are facing similar charges and sentencing; with the U.K. Muslim community now becoming synonymous with sexual perversion, grooming and abuse of young indigenous girls.

Yes, the media do over-hype Muslim crimes and downplay when non-Muslims engage in such villainy; but who acts so sinfully and illegally thereby giving them an opportunity to do so in the first place?

There are certain Fundamental Principles (ahqam) of Deen which need to be understood to avoid such fitna and fasad (mischief & anarchy).

Firstly, under no circumstances may any Muslim female of any age be in lone company of any male; who is not a Deeni Conscious, trustworthy Mahram (a relative whom she can never ever marry); no matter what his position, qualification or standing.

Although this appears extreme and ultra-orthodox to modern liberal minds; this also includes an irresponsible faasiq father, brother, son, nephew, uncle & grandfather.

People who view inappropriate, lewd, and Haram images on their Smartphone-Tablet-TV; all fall under this category of being unreliable, untrustworthy and fussaq.

So, any unbiased Muslim may and should decide for themselves, in this era, how many of their Mahrammaybe considered reliable?

Secondly, no Muslim, no matter how learned or otherwise, should be in a position of loneliness-privacy with any non-mahram of the opposite gender under any circumstances. This applies to males & females equally; teachers-scholars-doctors-nurses-dentists-tradesmen-businessmen-traders, etc, etc.

Thirdly, ‘children’ themselves need to be instilled with such qualities and levels of modesty, self-esteem, and self-respect whereby they immediately react like a lioness-lion to any untoward behaviour towards them by anybody, anywhere.

Now, when these basic principles of Deen are understood; we may infer:

Any Muslim Scholar who teaches opposite gender in person/privacy is sinful (and in an Islamic Country, the Qaadhi may and should order he/she be flogged for vulgar, lewd and inappropriate conduct).

Any Muslim Parent who allows their Child to be in the company of or be taught by a non-mahram is also sinful (and in an Islamic Country the Qaadhi may and should order them too be flogged for abdication of duty of care).

Any Masjid-Madrasah-Islamic Institution who allows Muslim Youth-Children placed under their care to be exposed to any non-Mahram; they too are sinful (and in an Islamic Country, the Qaadhi may and should order all those responsible to be flogged for abdication of duty and summarily dismissed from their post-office).

Any Muslim youth, who has reached age of maturity (buloogh) and is responsible enough, but still allow themselves to be in company of non-Mahram (for whatever reason); they too are sinful.

Before the Community starts pointing fingers at others; we would do well to look at how each of us conduct ourselves and why we find these basic tenets of Deen so unpalatable and too strict?

Majority of Muslim men of this era are cuckold (dayooth); they are totally careless in how their juniors – including females – interact with opposite gender; similarly, majority of Muslim women of this era have become so distanced from Deen and defeminised; they too regard concealment as some form of retrogression, backward and they must exhibit themselves, in some manner or another, even from underneath a designer shaped, glittering, tight-fitting Jubbah-scarf to reveal their identity and personality.

One more critical factor, which is conveniently being overlooked is many of the UK Scholars who were at forefront of Covid Protocols (Masajid Closures; facemasks; halalising haram vaccines) and the Interfaith Agenda, are now being rounded up on other charges – whether true or false.

This is how traitors are apprehended and punished. The reason why the Glorious Qur’an is replete with warnings issued to the Ulama of BaniIsra’eel is for this Ummah not to repeat the same errors and as a result suffer similar consequence:

Regarding the revelation of this Verse, Mufti Rasheed Ahmad Ludhyanwirahimahullah relates the narration of Rasoolullahsallallahu alayhi wasallam:

‘In the beginning, the Ulama of Bani Isra’eel used to prevent and admonish their people from sins; propagate Deen and instil fear of Allah Ta’ala in them. However, when people refused to heed; their ‘Ulama began to associate, eat, drink, and socialise with them; they failed to highlight their sins. Due to this nefarious conduct of the Ulama, the Curse of Allah Ta’ala settled over all of them.’

Allah Ta’ala have Mercy upon us all.  (End of the Brother’s dissertation)

Our Comment

The Brother has presented the factual reality. These now disgraced molvis and muftis have brought shame and disgrace to the Muslim community and to Islam with their flagrant and shameless violations of the Shariah. The calamity of disgrace and imprisonment which has befallen them is the consequence of their treachery to Allah Azza Wa Jal.

Hadhrat Muaaz Bin Yahya (Rahmatullah alayh) said:

“He who is treacherous to Allah in privacy, Allah

will rip off his veil (of concealment) in public.”

This is what is now happening to the molvis who had blatantly violated the Purdah/Hijaab ahkaam of the Shariah. Worse than their blatant violation, is their brazen justification by means of shaitaani ta’weel (interpretation) of their evil, immoral, sexual misdemeanours which are endemic in all such girls institutions where males are tutors.

The Hadith warns: “Never ever be alone with a female, for verily, the third one present is shaitaan.”

Despite being fully aware of the Hadith and Islam’s exceptionally strict system of segregation between the sexes, these miserable molvis deemed it appropriate to enslave themselves to their carnal lust, violate the Shariah’s Purdah restrictions thereby casting themselves in the cauldron of immorality in which Iblees has entrapped them. Since they were not remorseful and had no intention of Taubah and abandoning their nafsaani villainy, the punishment of disgrace and imprisonment has been inflicted on them.

The attempt by molvis to elevate these scoundrels to the lofty level of the Akaabir Ulama and Fuqaha of bygone times is absolutely scandalous to say the least. These miserable molvis and muftis, instead of heeding the command of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam): “Beware of places/occasions of suspicion.”, recklessly and flagrantly ignored all the Divine Warnings. Thus they became the victims of the nafs and Iblees, hence the disgrace which has now settled on them.

These are the same molvis who had championed the Ibleesi covid conspiratorial saga. They had closed the Musaajid, cancelled Jamaat Salaat, introduced devil’s distance in the saffs, the devil’s when the Musjid became partially opened, compelled musallis to don the devil’s niqaab, and they had also schemed other haraam acts to bootlick these very same kuffaar authorities who are today humiliating them.

May Allah Ta’ala save us from the evils of our nafs and the snares of Iblees.

20 Sha’baan 1444 – 13 March 2023

MUFTI TAQI’S CORRUPT FATWA

Posted on by alfaida

Question
Is it permissible for women to look at the picture of any Aalim, Shaikh or Buzrug whose gives talks on YouTube, television and other social media platforms? All of these buzrugs are na-mahaarem for the women?
Answer
If there is no fear of fitnah or lust then it is permissible for women to look at a video-talk of a reliable Aalim/Shaikh. But, since fitnah cannot be initially assessed, it is therefore precautionary for women not to look at the pictures when listening to the lecturer.
(End of the corrupt fatwa)

COMMENT
The aforementioned ‘fatwa’ to the question posed by a Pakistani lady, was issued by the darul ifta of Mufti Taqi. Every Muslim with healthy Imaan regardless of him/her lacking in Islamic Knowledge can understand the stupidity and invalidity of this corrupt fatwa.
Mufti Taqi is a halaalizer of haraam pictography, hence he and his darul ifta are in tight spots when such questions are posed. In seeking to wriggle out of the tight corner, these muftis adopt stupid fence-sitting stances which highlight the silliness and butlaan (invalidity) of the ‘fatwas’ which they disgorge by way of sucking their thumbs.
Firstly, the Qur’aan Majeed prohibits men and women looking at one another. “Say to the Mu’minaat to lower their gaze and to guard their chastity……” (An-Nur, Aayat 31). The first step towards zina (fornication/adultery) is the look, hence the Qur’aan prohibits looking without restrictive conditions. That is: it is haraam to look regardless of the assumption that the look is without lust. That the look is without lust is a shaitaani hallucination of the nafs. The Qur’aanic command is not abrogated on the basis of the hallucination of the look not being accompanied by lust.
The Qur’aan commands: “Do not come near to zina.” The look takes one near, very near to zina. In all cases, at least zina of the mind and heart is the first effect of the look. Even the moron mufti acknowledges in his fatwa that the Ihtiyaat (safety/precaution) necessitates abstention from looking.
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that the zina of the eyes is in looking… and the heart desires (zina).” But this wayward mufti says that it is permissible. Furthermore, he compounds his haraam, baatil fatwa with the kufr of pictures. Thus, the sin is a compounded double one: The sin of looking, and the kufr sin of believing that the haraam picture is halaal, and deceitfully encouraging women to stare at the ugly snouts of the so-called ‘buzrugs’ who advertise themselves on the worst kind of haraam media such as youtube, facebook and the like.
As far as the prohibition of looking is concerned, the Fuqaha have ruled that if one is aroused by looking even at one’s mahram female, e.g. niece, aunt, etc., then looking at her is forbidden. In one Hadith it is mentioned: “Every eye is adulterous.”
Despite the mas’alah being so palpably clear, the mufti befogs it with his stupid nafsaani answer because he is in a quandary stemming from his halaalizing of pictures.
The correct fatwa is simple and straightforward: Pictures are haraam. It is haraam for women to look at the ugly faces of the stupid molvis, shaikhs and crank buzrugs who appear on the satanic media screens. The sin is of an aggravated kind.

THE MAJLIS VOLUME 26 NUMBER 08

GATHERINGS OF THE FRIENDS

Posted on by alfaida

Posted on Fri 27 January 2023
ZINA GATHERINGS OF THE FRIENDS OF IBLEES

A justifiably exasperated Sister from Durban, correctly lamenting about a group of Friends of Iblees operating in Durban with their promotion of Zina in various guises, says:

“I wrote the following message for ulema in Durban, will email Jamiat KZN. Al Ansaar is a well known radio station, organization that allows such gatherings. I am not happy about it. Im not happy about the fact that it seems okay to make Islam modern, and to give promiscuity an ‘islamic’ cover.

Message for the Ulama

“I have a question regarding a very concerned matter.

It has been brought to my attention that gatherings which are not in accordance to Shariah are taking place. A group called FRIENDS has been active for the past 6 years. The initial purpose and intention of this group was to uplift women, give them support, help guide them to the right path, especially divorced women and widows. But now it has become a gathering for the rich. Women who are supposed to be in purdah are exposed to men in these gatherings. There are no precautions taken into consideration. The laws of shariah are being blatantly flouted. There are women who even do match making against the laws of Shariah. They have groups with men and allow the women to chat.

The members who wish to join these gatherings have to pay towards the expenses of these gatherings. It’s not voluntary. It’s like a high tea-gathering for the elite and not for the poor community.

Are such gatherings allowed by the Shariah?

As a woman I know there is a limit to what I can do and cannot. When such gatherings are becoming so popular. Why are the ulema not stepping in and stopping it? A woman like me can create awareness about it being wrong but these women who are involved in initiating such evil gatherings will not stop unless the ulema tell them this is not allowed. This cannot happen. You are breaking the law of shariah.

There are so many similar incidents occurring and some sisters have reached out to me saying they asked the ulema for help, and nothing was done.

They went to the Jamiat and nothing was done. So this gives the people who are modernizing Islam more advantage because the men are not speaking up.

I feel it needs to be spoken about in the Musjids so that men can tell their wives. It needs to be spoken about in every community.

In this time of fitna and fasad, we have to start standing up against these gatherings because these women are allowing dunya’s glamor to sweep them off their feet.

Below is images of an invitation the group “FRIENDS” created . It will be held at Al Ansaar coffee shop and hall. This week. I urge you to please look into this and do something about it.

This same group, FRIENDS, is having another gathering at a bed and breakfast near the Musjid. They collaborate with Ilmsa.” (End of the Sister’s letter)

COMMENT OF THE SHARIAH

Yes, indeed this stercoraceous group of copro individuals is correctly described as ‘FRIENDS”. They are the FRIENDS of Shaitaan – the Chief Iblees. In fact they could be correctly designated as being the illegitimate progeny of Iblees. Shaitaan does have legitimate children who are devils of his ilk. But, his illegitimate progeny is made up of copro humans whom he fans out into the world as his primary agents to execute his multifarious schemes and conspiracies of fitnah and fasaad. Zaani-aat of the category of this group, not ordinary prostitutes plying their immoral trade, and Zanaadaqah who misinterpret the Qur’aan and Ahaadith to fabricate meanings as cover for their kufr and nifaaq, are among the illegitimate progeny of Iblees.

We find ourselves in this era which is the initial phase of the Age of Dajjaal. In this era of Dajjaaliyat most of the minor signs of Qiyaamah are being enacted in preparation for the final stage when Dajjaal himself will emerge as predicted by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

While we lament and Islamically rant against all agents of Dajjaal and Iblees, we should not be surprised nor weaken our resolve regarding the vital and sacred obligation of Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahyi Anil Munkar which must be perpetuated until the very last regardless of who accepts or rejects. The Ulama should not abandon Amr Bil Ma’roof because of the wide-scale, intensive and extensive prevalence of shaitaani fitnah and fasaad. The process of fitnah is incremental. It will not decrease. We are heading for Qiyaamah, and the dunya has to be destroyed. Our objective is not to provide hidaayat (guidance). Hidaayat is the prerogative exclusively of Allah Azza Wa Jal. Confirming this reality, the Qur’aan Majeed states:

“Verily, you (O Muhammad!) cannot guide whom you love. But Allah guides whomever He wills, and He knows best who are to be guided.”

This ‘Friends’ group as described by the Sister and as their pictures and write-ups further elaborate, is undoubtedly a shaitaani ZINA group of shayaateenul ins (human devils) which Iblees has harnessed to lure stupid women into his snare of immorality, vice and Zina. All the women who are taking a leading role in the implementation of the Zina Plot of Shaitaan are confirmed zaani-aat who are being handled and mishandled by the zaani menfolk. The evil men in whose hands Shaitaan has placed the reins of this extremely jahannami insidious plot of zina has most cunningly trapped the prostitutes into the plot of Iblees.

These zaani-aat are satanically camouflaged as self-esteem coaches, psychiatrists, reflexocologists, coprocologists, najaasatocologists, sataniocologists, dajjaalocologists, etc., etc. Understand well, that all ‘psychiatrists’ and ‘counsellors’ are agents of Iblees. Whatever they dole out as ‘advice’ and ‘therapy’ are satanic ‘sciences’ inspired by Iblees. Only such ignorant Muslims whose Imaan dwells in the doldrums of moral corruption, who are bereft of any Yaqeen in Allah Ta’ala, visit such she and he-devils for advice. These villains who are qualified in the satanic ‘science’ of psychiatry and the like are in the same category as fortune-tellers and satanic astrologers. Your Imaan dangles by a thread when you visit these shaitaani rubbishes, and your Imaan says ‘goodbye’ to you after you emerge with confidence from these agents of Iblees.

The Sister is justified for her extremely mild criticism of the Durban Ulama for their silence. She mentions that this ‘Friends’ group of shaitaani zaani-aat has been inexistence in Durban since the past six years. It was therefore necessary for the Ulama to have castigated and excoriated this haraam, zina group operated by the Illegitimate Daughters of Iblees. The silence of the Ulama is a primary cause for sin and vice becoming indurate and embedded in the community.

While most Muslims in this age are absolutely jaahil, corrupt and evil, numerous among them are sincere and genuinely astray. Amr Bil Ma’roof will benefit such ignoramuses. As for the zaani-aat who are executing the plot of Iblees and who are operating under the appellation, ‘Friends’, there is no hope of reformation for them. They are not like ordinary prostitutes who are in the business only for money. While there is always hope for the reformation of commercial prostitutes, there is no hope whatsoever for such ZAANI-AAT who are the agents of Iblees – whose function it is to entrap other stupid women who have the tendencies of prostitutes.

The Qur’aan Majeed negates hope of reformation for these kind of copro-hybrid human-devils. In regard to the progeny of Shaitaan, Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Majeed:

“We have created numerous humans and jinn (specifically) as fuel for Jahannam.”

The Qur’aan describing the fodder of Hell-Fire variously epithelizes them as “Wuqooun Naar and Hasabu Jahannam.

The shameless intermingling of the sexes, the satanic match-making, the shaitaani glamour of tea parties, and the very satanic attitudes associated with this shaitaani group of copro individuals are some of the factors which even stupid Muslims can understand why this group is HARAAM and why their shaitaani functions are HARAAM.

“O People of Imaan! Save yourselves and your familes from the Fire… (Qur’aan)

Do not fall into the shaitaani trap of this shaitaani “Friends’ group consisting of human devils.

5 Rajab 1444 – 27 January 2023

Ulama Retirement Fund

Posted on by alfaida

Posted on 

Ulama Retirement Fund

QUESTION

Please comment on  Darul Iftaa Mahmudiyya’s  proposal of a retirement fund for Ulama. Does this fund have Islamic credibility? Something does not seem right with this fund. Please study the attached proposal.

ANSWER

It is your Imaani conscience which indicates to you that “something is wrong” with the retirement proposal. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Sin is that which agitates  your conscience.” It is a proposal  in conflict with both Islamic teaching and  Islamic spirit. The proposal sets Allah Ta’ala aside.  It fails to understand that the Rizq of all creation is the responsibility of Allah Azza Wa Jal, and that Rizq is predetermined and sealed, hence Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: 

“Rizq is sealed, and the  one of greed is deprived.”

The proposal is the effect of doubting the Razzaaqiyat of Allah Who is the Sole Provider.  He says in the Qur’aan Majeed: “Many are the animals  which do not load their rizq on their backs. It is Allah Who provides their rizq and your rizq.” 

The proposal is in keeping with kuffaar ethos and the capitalist system.  The proposal is remarkably oblivious of the objective of Ilm-e-Deen and of the Darul Ulooms. In fact, the Darul Ulooms of today are largely ignorant of the Maqsood of Ilm, hence Deeni Knowledge is imparted for the sake of the dunya, for the attainment of mundane goals. The Darul Ulooms have become signs of Qiyaamah. According to the Hadith, among the signs of Qiyaamah, is that the Knowledge of the Deen will be imparted for purposes other than the Deen, and acts of the Deen will be for the sake of worldly gains.

books_ulama-retirement-fund_ereadDownload