WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE ONE WHO CLAIMS THAT THE KUFFAAR ARE
DESERVING OF JANNAT???
Allah Ta’ala states: “Verily, the Deen by Allah is only Islam.” (Surah Aal-e-Imraan, Aayat 19) Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Bani Israeel (the Jews) split up into seventy-two sects and my Ummah will split into seventy-three sects. All, except one, will be in the Fire.’ The Sahaabah asked: ‘Which is that (one sect), O Rasulullah?’ Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) said: ‘That group which is on my path and that of my Sahaabah.”
The only valid Imaan, is the Imaan acquired from the Sahaabah – the Imaan of the Ummah: “If they believe like your belief (like that Islam which you believe in), then only will they be on guidance.” (Surah Baqarah, Aayat 137) By Allah, there is only one Faith, and that is Islam as understood with the greatest clarity from the Aayat quoted right at the beginning. Never ever does Allah accept any religion nor any multifaith concept, and those who search for any other religion or seek to integrate religions and to placate the kuffaar by condonation of their kufr and shirk, are accursed Munaafiqeen. The Qur’aan very emphatically says: “Whoever searches for a deen other than Islam, never ever shall it be accepted from him, and in the Aakhirah he will be among the losers (destined for HellFire).” (Surah Aal-e-Imraan, Aayat 85) Every Muslim is aware of the indisputable Qur’aanic fact that the Kuffaar are destined for everlasting residency and perdition in Jahannam. “Whoever practises righteous deeds, be it male or female, while he (or she) is a Mu’min, verily, they (Believers) will enter Jannat.” (Surah Mu’min, Aayat 40) It is abundantly clear from the above-cited Aayat, that righteous deeds are acceptable to Allah Ta’ala only if Imaan is present. Without Imaan, righteous deeds are not accepted for reward in the Aakhirah, hence the Aayat says: ‘While he (or she) is a Mu’min.’ Thus the basis of acceptable virtuous deeds is Imaan. Entry into Jannah –
Najaat in the Aakhirah – is dependent on Imaan according to the Qur’aan Shareef.
“Those who are Kaafir their (good) deeds are like glittering sand in a plain,
which a thirsty person thinks to be water (i.e. like a mirage). But when he (the thirsty one) reaches it, he finds it to be nothing…” (Surah Nur, Aayat 39)
The above Aayat states explicitly that righteous deeds of the Kuffaar are of no significance insofar as the Aakhirah is concerned. Righteous deeds on the foundations of kufr resemble mirages. Such righteousness is not acceptable to Allah Ta’ala. We are bound by the Shariah to accept and submit to every belief and practice of Islam. We realize from the Qur’aan Shareef and the Ahaadith that the most valuable treasure is Imaan and the greatest calamity is Kufr. Everlasting bliss is the result of Imaan while everlasting damnation is the consequence of Kufr.
What is Imaan and what is Kufr? It is of vital importance to understand properly the Islamic conceptions of Imaan and Kufr. Salvation in the Hereafter pivots on Imaan while perpetual loss and disaster will be the compensation of Kufr. A thorough understanding of these two concepts is thus imperative. In these times of liberalism, ignorance and materialism great havoc has been wrought to the pure Imaan of numerous Muslims not versed in Islamic knowledge. The modernist Zindeeqs, heavily influenced by westernism with its accompaniment of kufr theories, have thrown many unwary Muslims into confusion and doubt by attributing fanciful interpretations to Imaan. The clear, explicit and well-defined Islamic concept of Imaan has been made to appear as incorporating all theories and
views of kufr. On the basis of such ambiguous Imaan, one subscribing to kufr remains a Muslim in the opinion of modernist Zindeeqs. In view of this lamentable situation, there is a dire need for a thorough explanation of the Islamic concepts of Imaan and Kufr so that Muslims become aware of the
snares of deception strewn about them – snares which will entrap them, destroy their Imaan and their Aakhirah. Thus, we need to be thoroughly grounded in the details of Imaan, i.e. we need to ensure that we have correct beliefs (Aqaaid).
THE KUFR OF ABRAHAM DAFOOL
Considering the snares of deception which have to be refuted, it has been brought to our notice that some chap from the Cape, Abraham DaFool who is notorious for his Kufr and for his dalliance with the scrap Kufr Cape Accord which was primarily in justification of the Shia Kuffaar, has recently claimed that an Archbishop deserves Jannat because of his ‘justice’!!! May Allah save us from such Kufr. Aameen
The Ibleesi claim of Abraham DaFool is palpable Kufr. It expels from the fold of Islam a person who subscribes to it. This Kufr belief violently militates against the Qur’aan and Ahaadith. Subjecting the Qur’aan and Ahaadith to personal interpretation, whim and fancy is Zandaqah (heresy, blasphemy) which negates Imaan. The criteria for Jannat is Imaan, not ‘justice’! Kufr is injustice – the worst! Without subscribing to the concept of Imaan propounded by the Qur’aan, the consequence is only everlasting Jahannam. There are numerous Qur’aanic Aayaat debunking the Kufr of Abraham DaFool of which a few will be mentioned below. Regarding the everlasting nature of the stay of the Kuffaar, Allah Ta’ala states:
“Whoever disobeys Allah and His Rasool, then verily for them is the Fire of
Jahannam wherein they will dwell forever.” (Surah Jinn, Aayat 23)
“Verily Allah cursed the Kaafireen and has prepared for them the Scorching Fire wherein they will dwell forever. They will not find a friend nor a helper.
That day when their faces will be grilled in the Fire, they will exclaim: ‘Would that we had obeyed Allah and obeyed the Rasool.’ And they will say: ‘O our Rabb, verily we had obeyed our leaders and our seniors. Then they deviated us from the (STRAIGHT) Path. Our Rabb! Give them a double punishment, and curse them a great curse.’” (Surah Ahzaab, Aayaat 64 – 68)
“And whoever does not have Imaan in Allah Ta’ala and His Rasool
(Muhammad-Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) verily, We have prepared for the
kaafireen (the rejectors of Imaan) a blazing fire.” (Surah Fath, Aayat 13)
“Say (O Muhammad!): Obey Allah Ta’ala and the Rasool (Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam). And, if you turn away (from this belief), then
verily, Allah Ta’ala does not love the kaafireen.” (Surah Aal-e-Imraan, Aayat 32)
“Verily, the worst of creatures by Allah are those who commit kufr, thus they have no Imaan.” (Surah Anfaal, Aayat 55)
“Verily, they spoke a word of kufr, and they committed kufr after their Islam, and they conspired such things (objectives) which they could not attain.” (Surah Taubah, Aayat 74)
KUFR is the worst form of zulm (oppression/injustice)! Allah Ta’ala states: “Verily Shirk (Kufr) is Colossal Zulm”. (Surah Luqman, Aayat 13)
Now what do archbishops propagate??? Do archbishops accept the Kalimah of Islam? Do archbishops, priests and pastors propagate that Nabi Isa Alayhis Salaam is not God? Do reverends and archbishops believe in Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam? Do they even accept Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam?
When the archbishop is guilty of compound Kufr and Shirk, and when even a small child knows that only Muslims will go to Jannat, then it reveals the Kufr status of Abraham DaFool who avers that people of Kufr are deserving of Jannat. Abraham DaFool is not ignorant of the fact that according to the Law of Allah, only Muslims will go to Jannat. But Abraham DaFool openly propagates views in conflict with the Qur’aan. He treats the Aqaaid of Islam very lightly and publicly opposes what Allah Ta’ala has stated in the Qur’aan! This renders him a Murtad besides all the other acts of kufr which he is guilty of. He should not pretend to be a Muslim. Kufr and Imaan are mutually repellent. May Allah grant us Maut upon Imaan. Aameen
“What! Do you believe in part of the Kitaab and commit kufr with part? The punishment for any of you who does so, is nothing but disgrace in this worldly life, and on the Day of Qiyaamah, they shall be driven to the worst of punishment.” (Surah Baqarah, Aayat 85)
GUARD YOUR IMAAN!!! MAKE SURE THAT YOUR BELIEFS ARE IN CONFORMITY TO THE SHARIAH!!!
By Mujlisul Ulama
THEME OF THE ATHEIST
Espousing the atheism of the Spanish Jew, Spinoza and of the atheist Einstein, one miserable character who parades himself as a Muslim, in an article over-saturated with kufr of the worst kind, captioned “Is God a Christian, Jew, Muslim or Hindu?”, outlining his religion of kufr and nifaaq, states the cardinal articles of his stercoraceous, humbug ideology to be:
* That Islam is not the sole and absolute repository of Truth and salvation. Such a belief is sectarianism for the lost character who has lost his Imaani bearings just as Iblees had lost his bearings when Allah Ta’ala had commanded the Sajdah for Hadhrat Aadam (Alayhis salaam).
* That Allah is not an Intelligent, Real, Divine Being with Attributes, and Who creates. On the contrary He is an abstract figment or caricature of the created mind of copro-characters such as…
View original post 5,362 more words
THE MYTH OF THE TRI-ABRAHAMIC FAITHS
In a failed subtle attempt to project the kufr religions of Christianity and Judaism to be on par with Islam, the one and only Absolute Truth and
Repository of Salvation (Najaat in the Aaakhirah), the lost soul, like other interfaith agents of Iblees, presents the ibleesi mythical adage of the ‘three Abrahamic faiths’. The natural inhibition for kufr with which every Muslim is born, is diluted and even eliminated in modernist and jaahil Muslims by the baatil concept of the three religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) being ‘Abrahamic’, that is, stemming from Nabi Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam).
This concept is a satanic deception. Only Islam is ‘Abrahamic’. The other two religions as well as all other religions are never ‘Abrahamic’. They
are all Satanist cults. The Qur’aan Majeed states:
“(O Muhammad!) Say (to these mushrikeen and kuffaar): ‘What do you dispute with us about Allah while He is our Rabb and your Rabb. For us are our deeds and for you are your deeds. We are unto Him sincere. What! You are saying that Ibraaheem, Ismaaeel, Ishaaq, Ya’qoob and the Clans were
Yahood or Nasaara?’ Say: ‘What! Are you more knowledgeable than Allah. And, who is a greater oppressor than him who conceals the testification (of the Truth) from Allah?” (Al-Baqarah, 139, 140)
Hadhrat Ibraaheem (Alayhis Salaam) and the other Ambiya in his progeny were never Yahood nor Nasaara. Allah Ta’ala dismisses this myth with contempt.
“They (the Jews and Christians) say: ‘Become Yahood or Nasaara then you will be guided.’ Say: ‘In fact the Millat (Deen) of Ibraaheem is the Straight (Deen). He was not of the mushrikeen.” (Al-Baqarah, Aayat 135)
The Deen of Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam) was the Straight Deen of Islam. It was not contaminated by the slightest pollution of Christianity and Judaism.
“O Ahl-e-Kitaab! Why do you dispute regarding Ibraaheem while the Tauraah and Injeel were not revealed except after him. What, have you no brains? (Aal Imraan, Aayat 65)
“Ibraaheem was neither a Yahood nor a Nasaara. But (on the contrary) he was a Resolute Muslim, and he was not of the mushrikeen.” (Aal Imraan, Aayat 67)
“Verily, of mankind, the most befitting (to claim to be) of Ibraaheem are those who follow him, and this Nabi (Muhammad) and those who have
Imaan, And Allah is the Friend of the Mu’mineen.” (Aal Imraan, Aayat 68)
Allah Ta’ala in this Aayat explicitly debunks the tri-Abrahamic faith copro-concept of the interfaithers.
“Say: Allah has stated the truth. Therefore, follow the Millat of Ibraaheem, the Haneef, and he was not of the mushrikeen.” (Aal Imraan, Aayat 95)
Allah Ta’ala has titled Hadhrat Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam) with the attribute of Haneef, i.e. one who veers far, extremely far from all crooked
paths of falsehood. There is not the slightest resemblance between the Millat of Hadhrat Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam) and Christianity /Judaism. These two are ideologies of kufr and shirk. They are the very antithesis of the Millat of Nabi Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam). They never stem from Hadhrat Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam).
Their religions are the products of satanism. There is nothing ‘Abrahamic’ about their baatil /false religions.
Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam) was the breaker of idols. He displayed no toleration for the kufr, shirk and idols of the false religions. Describing
his extreme hatred and aversion for shirk and kufr, the Qur’aan Majeed states:
“(Remember) when he (Ibraaheem) said to his father and his community: ‘What are these idols which you are worshipping?’ They said: ‘We found our ancestors worshipping them.’ He said: ‘Verily, most certainly, you and your ancestors are in manifest deviation.’ (Al-Ambiyaa, Aaayaat 52, 53, 54)
“Then he (Ibraaheem) smashed them (the idols), except the big one so that they (the mushrikeen) may refer to it.” (Al-Ambiyaa, Aayat 58)
Even the Mushrikeen of Arabia, like the Yahood and Nasaara, had claimed that they were following the Deen of Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam). In their conception of religion, their religion of gross shirk and worship of idols was
also ‘Abrahamic’ just as the moron devils of the interfaith plot claim . But the Qur’aan Majeed rebuts this baseless claim despite the fact that remnants of the Deen existed among these mushrikeen, albeit in a totally corrupted manner. Falsehood cannot be attributed to Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam) regardless of there being any physical lineage. The Yahood being the progeny of Nabi Ishaaq (Alayhis salaam) does not warrant their baatil (false and corrupt) religion being described as ‘Abrahamic’, and the same applies to the Nasaara and the Mushrikeen of Arabia. The Qur’aan emphatically rebuts this satanic notion. The only people who can validly claim to be religiously and spiritually “Abrahamic”, are in the words of the Qur’aan Majeed:
“Verily, of mankind, the most befitting (to claim to be) of Ibraaheem are those who follow him, and this Nabi (Muhammad) and those who have
Imaan. And Allah is the Friend of the Mu’mineen.” (Aal Imraan, Aayat 68)
Thus only Muslims are ‘Abrahamic’. All others are Satanic. The idea of Judaism and Christianity being Abrahamic is a massive canard. It is devoid
of the slightest vestige of validity. The Qur’aan describes Nabi Ibraaheem (Alayhis salaam) as a Muslim and Haneef while the Yahood and Nasaara are described by the Qur’aan as zaalimeen, kaafireen and faasiqeen. Describing
their religions as ‘Abrahamic’ is stupid, absurd and false.
TAKEN FROM THE BOOK: “IS GOD A CHRISTIAN, JEW, MUSLIM OR HINDU?”
BY THE MAJLIS ULAMA OF SOUTH AFRICA
This doctrine teaches that God asked himself to go to Earth to save mankind.
Then He agreed with Himself and volunteered Himself, to Himself, to offer Himself.
Then God impregnated a woman as Himself, with Himself.
God prayed to Himself and Glorified Himself repeatedly.
God strengthened Himself and talked to Himself.
Finally God forsook Himself and sacrificed Himself to prove His loyalty to Himself.
While dead He resurrected Himself so He could exalt Himself above Himself.
Then He sat at His own right hand and waited until He placed His enemies as His footstool.
Finally with Satan’s forces defeated, God would turn His kingdom over to Himself. That all things would become everything to Himself…
“Jesus will reject man worshipping on the Day of Judgement”:
And (remember) when Allah will say (on the Day of Resurrection): “O Isa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)! Did you say to men:…
View original post 225 more words
Question:What does the Shariah say about boycotting Israeli goods? If a group organizes such a boycott, does it become incumbent on the community to observe the boycott? Is it permissible to pressurize people to observe the boycott, and to label them traitors for not observing the boycott?
Answer: Firstly, it is necessary to ascertain who the people are who initiate these boycotts. The initiators are all faasiq and faajir men and women whose relationship with the Deen is extremely deficient. The type of activities they indulge in to highlight their boycotts of Israel, confirm their fisq and fujoor. They descend to hooliganism and haraam acts. There is no regard for the Shariah’s commands and prohibitions.
The very first disqualification of a movement or an activity is the fisq and fujoor of its leaders/ initiators. If the initiators are fussaaq and fujjaar, the movement stands condemned. It will be…
View original post 515 more words
By Ibn Mosharraf
After decades of apathy we are finally seeing Muslims mobilizing and agitating against France for their continued anti-Muslim policies.
Something that many of us have been calling for years.
But these calls for boycott is not sitting well with some(or many) self-professed advocates of Laïcité (Secularism) and even some Muslims.
Here is a summary of the contentions against boycott making rounds online.
- The Prophet(ﷺ) tolerated blasphemy. Muslims who are protesting against blasphemy are radical extremists and terrorists. Or enabling them.
- Muslim nations should civilize themselves first before lecturing a Modern Nation like France which promotes Free Speech.
- Boycotting France is Hypocrisy. What about the Uyghurs?
- Boycotts are not effective.
- What about offensive verses in the Quran?
This two part series will address these contentions as comprehensively as possible.
In this first part we will discuss the following issues.
- Are Muslims unIslamic in their intolerance towards blasphemy?
View original post 2,381 more words
Peace be upon those who followed the guidance and, as for what follows… I received that you are in astonishment at how Sophie Petronin, a French woman of pure white race, Catholic Christianity, had converted to Islam after 75 years of Christianity and during 4 years of captivity among Muslims!
Let me simplify things for you Mr. Macron…
Yes, I was a prisoner of the Muslims … but they never touched me badly and their treatment of me was all appreciation and respect. They used to offer me food and drink and influence me on themselves despite the scarcity of resources .. and they respected my privacy. No one ever subjected me to verbal or physical harassment, and they did not insult my religion, Jesus or the Virgin Peace be upon them both as you do with the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him
They did not impose Islam on me, but I saw in their morals people who purify themselves with water and pray the Lord the five prayers and fast the month of Ramadan
The Muslims in Mali are poor, yes, and their country is poor. There is no Eiffel Tower and they do not know our French perfumes, but they are the cleanest of us and the purest of hearts.
Yes, they do not own luxury cars and do not inhabit tall towers, but their concern is above the clouds and their faith is more firmly than the mountains.
Have you heard the recitation of the Qur’an in your life while they recite the Qur’an in their prayer at dawn and at night?
How beautiful it is a reading even if you do not understand what they are chanting, and your body shudders and your body shudder as you listen to them chanting the words of God, for they memorize it by heart. Then you realize in your subconscious mind that this is not a human speech but rather a heavenly melody descended from the sky and you have an intense desire to know the meaning of what They chant at dawn and at night from heavenly hymns!
Have you made one prostration in your life for God and made your forehead touch the ground and whispered to your Lord about your worries and thanked Him for His blessings as they do? Have you ever felt the closeness of God to you and your closeness to Him?
Their women are black as charcoal, but their hearts are white as milk. They wear simple clothes, but in the eyes of their men they are the most beautiful, they do not mix with foreign men, they do not disturb them, and one of them does not enter a man into her home in the absence of her husband. They do not drink alcohol, do not play gambling, and do not commit adultery!
The Muslims there believe in all the prophets, even the Prophet of God Jesus whom they love more than us.
And his mother, Mary, who I named myself after her because of their great love and veneration for her and her position.
You might ask me: How do they love Christ more than we do?
I answer you: Yes, they love the Lord Christ more than we do because our country shed the blood of the innocent in the name of Christ, their countries became desolate and their wealth was plundered, so we enjoy the goods of Muslim countries and we extract the tribute from their rulers in various ways and we impose commercial and consumer projects that do not develop on them and spread sedition among them and then sell them weapons to kill each other, but we are still We consider them terrorists when they realize that we are the terrorists, not them!
But they dealt with me and other hostages with the morals of Christ that we were learning in the churches but we do not apply in reality.
In conclusion … I did not want to declare my Islam in Mali so that I would not be said to have converted to Islam under the sword, and I decided to declare my Islam while I was free on the land of France to convey the message of Islam to millions of French and to Europe with its Christian and atheist parts as a whole!
This is the religion of Islam that you are fighting day and night, it has stirred my heart and filled my mind…
I no longer see France with its glamorous beauty
The most beautiful of the poor, modest Mali
I even decided to come back to it again
But after inviting my family and loved ones to Islam
Because I want them to taste the sweetness of what I have tasted from the worship of the one and only God, for whom there is no god but He, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful, and I want them the goodness of this world and the hereafter.
I also invite you to Islam and to repeat your accounts with this great religion, which is the message of all the prophets and messengers from the time of Adam, passing through Jesus Christ, and concluding with the master of the Anam Muhammad peace be upon him.
And peace be upon those who follow guidance…
A PRIEST OFFERS ADVICE TO THE MUFTIS AND MOLVIS – TO THE BOOTLICKERS
A Brother from the U.K. writes:
Attached is a statement from a “Father” David Palmer. There are some instructive lessons for the Ulama in the UK, and frankly they should be ashamed that a person of falsehood can stand up so bravely for his beliefs, but the inheritors of the prophets can’t bat an eyelid. What sort of inheritors are they? Are they even Muslim? If a clergyman can show more backbone than “Hadhrat,” what does that say about the ‘Hadhraats, Muftis and Molvis’ and their value for Deen – the very Deen that Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam tied stones to his stomach for.
The first point in his short post demonstrates his willingness to go to the very edge to protect his religion. He is willing to be arrested. Isn’t that what all our pious predecessors did, i.e. do everything within their physical capability to uphold the pillars of Allah’s Deen?
Did Maulana Husain Ahmad Madni Rahmatullahi Alayh not go to prison for preservation of Deen? Here a clergyman is teaching the ‘Ulama’ of what value should be attached to Deen.
He then makes public repentance for his previous stance which was also made public. Let alone private repentance, we have Ulama in the UK behaving like compliant poodles over a ‘plandemic’ that has an infection fatality rate of less than 1%.
Thirdly, the clergyman is teaching UK Ulama the value of the hereafter and the insignificance of this putrid dunya which has been equated to a carcass.
It is mind boggling how a clergyman can unwittingly provide advices the essence of which should be the belief of the Muslims.
We’re in the era where the Sahabi mentioned that not a single person in the Masjid will be a Muslim. May Allah Ta’ala grant David Palmer the hidaayat of Imaan. (End of the brother’s letter)
THE STATEMENT OF THE PRIEST
Wales has decided to close the Churches again. I will be arrested before I deny the sacraments to the people of God again. And I repent for having backed down before. Eternal life comes before this life…or our faith means nothing. Fr David Palmer
(End of the priest’s statement)
The “instructive lessons” are not only for the molvi cartel of U.K. The advice of the priest is valid for all the bootlicking molvis all over the world.
According to the Hadith, a word of Wisdom is the property of Muslims. He should take possession of it wherever he finds it. In this era, Imaan of even the Buzroogs and genuine Shaikhs is exceptionally weak. While it cannot be expected of them to acquit themselves like the Akaabireen of former times, the bare Waajib minimum expectation is that they do not become bootlickers – that they should not acquit themselves like munaafiqeen – that they should not mislead and deceive the ignorant and unwary with baseless, weird interpretations to justify the kufr theories of the atheists and to support the kufr protocols of the kuffaar governments.
An Aalim of the Haqq, if unable to proclaim the Haqq vociferously, should maintain silence and in privacy teach Muslims the Haqq. He should not become a bootlicker nor act like a munaafiq.
After reading the advice and stance of the priest, molvis, sheikhs and buzroogs who have become bootlickers, should hang their heads in shame, resort to Taubah, proclaim the Haqq, and if they refuse, then it is best that they drown themselves in their cesspool of inequity, fisq, fujoor and kufr.
4 Rabiul Awwal 1442 – 21 October 2020
Custodians of the Haq
QUESTION: The other day, Maulana Ebrahim Bham was on a particular local radio station discussing the topic of ‘spirituality under lockdown’ with various faith group leaders of SA, such as a Rabbi and a Reverend. Kindly comment on this issue. Shukran
ANSWER: Brother, take solace from the Blessed words of our beloved Rasool-e-Kareem (Sallallahu alaihi wasallam): “Islam began as GHAREEB (something strange / odd /queer) and will soon return to that state. Thus, blessed are the GHURABAA’ (strangers –i.e. those who are odd (in society) due to their following Deen fully).” (Saheeh Muslim) These days, it is ‘strange’ and ‘odd’ or ‘queer’ for Muslim scholars who are trying to uphold the Laws of Allah NOT to be involved in the misdoings, HARAAM and sins that are committed by the modern-thinking deviated scholars publicly! Take for example, TV. Due to the modern-thinking ‘Ulama’ appearing on this accursed tool of the devil, laymen think it is permissible. Hence, Ulama who don’t approve of TV are regarded to be the ‘odd’ ones in society! We are in that Zamaanah (time) in which those who are practicing Islam in the Light of the Qur’an, Hadith, etc., are regarded as ‘strange’ by the laymen due to the mass destruction and bulldozing of the Sacred Laws of the Deen by the modern-thinking scholars.
Furthermore, a Muslim is not supposed to feel comfortable amidst Kuffar religious leaders.
More so when the dialogue is that of interfaith! How can a Muslim bear to quietly sit and listen to the genuine and direct Kufr and Shirk uttered by religious leaders? This Kufr and Shirk is dinned into the ears of ALL listeners – scholars or otherwise. It will ultimately have a ‘negative-result’ in one’s (spiritual) heart, which will then affect one’s Imaan – the best and most valuable commodity of life!
We make Shukr to Allah Ta’ala that the above program you mentioned did not involve any Aalim of the Haq. It is expected to hear of those scholars who are de-sensitized to the Laws of Deen – by their breaking the Laws of Deen on a mass scale, daily – to comfortably sit and participate in these type of programs, which then results in them becoming deImaanized. May Allah have mercy upon this Ummah and save us from the mob of deviated Ulama, Aameen.
There is no need to elaborate further on this issue. Muslims who apply their Imaani intellect will understand.