Islam Reigns

By Sikandar Iqbal

In recent decades, heterodox “thinkers” have emerged, proposing “reforms” to the Islāmic position on same-sex relations. They argue that the Qur’ānic message has been misunderstood by the erudite scholars of the past or that perhaps the language itself is malleable enough to accommodate same-sex relationships alongside normative heterosexual ones.

However, Allāh has promised the protection of His Word (15:9). There are many ways to demonstrate the intellectual shallowness of those who wish to change the transcendent ethic. But perhaps the most pertinent here is how Allāh has intertextually protected the meaning of the Qur’ān.

Thus, a primary source in Islām to acquire the meaning of the Qur’ān is the verses of the Qur’ān themselves. More commonly known as ‘tafsīr ul Qur’ān bil Qur’ān,’ this intertextual hermeneutical approach is recognised by all the erudite exegetes of the past and is epistemically the strongest form of interpretation in the…

View original post 521 more words




A Brother from Pakistan says:

I met a senior ustad from Jamiatur Rasheed who is teaching Mishkaat there. He asked me what is my problem with Jamia. 

I said the first problem is making pictures halaal. You used to criticize Arab Ulama saying that they don’t have any ilm and depth of ilm, hence they make pictures halaal. Then 10-15 years later you do not make pictures only halaal, but you make them farz. So the first problem is, you don’t have any consistency. Secondly, if you truly believe that pictures are halaal then again, why should I follow or trust someone who got on the train after 10 to 15 years. It shows some serious lack of ilmi depth from you people that it takes you 20-25 years to make something halaal that Arab Ulama had made halaal 30 years ago. (I don’t trust any of them, this was just for the sake of argument).

(Our comment: Yes, they suffer from the maladies of hubb-e-jah and hubb-e-maal. The object is to please the masses and to gain name and fame for the gratification of nafsaani demands. This is the basis for their inconsistency. Their current view of permissibility is not based on any valid Shar’i daleel.

 If an Aalim retracts his earlier view on the basis of valid Daleel of the Shariah, he shall be lauded for his honesty and humility. But these liberal characters such as the treacherous molvis of Jamiatur Rasheed and Taqi Sahib present silly arguments devoid of Shar’i substance to bamboozle the masses and to exhibit academic prowess when in reality a mediocre student of Deen understands the drivel of their flapdoodle averment that a picture is not a picture when the method of production changes. Indeed there is divinely cast rijs (filth) on their brains, hence they utter such flaccid and absurd arguments. About this rijs which has deranged their intellectual balance, the Qur’aan Majeed states: “Allah casts rijs on (the brains) of those who do not understand.”)

You believe and think that deen is spreading through youtube and facebook but you fail to understand that actually Islam is becoming a joke because of these videos. The same people who subscribe to your channels will subscribe to some singer then some filmstar then some comedian. They will be drinking tea and listening to your bayaan and immediately thereafter they will be watching movies on the same youtube or listening to a song. 

(Our comment: They are indeed making a mockery of themselves by exhibiting their snouts on these shaitaani media. The Deen has become a joke and a ball to be kicked about at the behest of the nafs. It is about these youtube and facebook molvis and maaajin muftis that on the Day of Qiyaamah, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) will complain to Allah Ta’ala: “O My Rabb! These people have taken the Qur’aan as an object of rebuff (to kick around like a ball).”

He said this is right but firstly hundreds of ulama of Pakistan have agreed to media. You are going against all of them. How can you say they are wrong?

(Our comment: Even if all the ulama of the world today agree on the permissibility of interest, liquor and pork, such satanic ‘unanimity’ shall be refuted with the contempt it deserves. It shall be said that these louts are kuffaar and they come within the purview of the prediction of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) who said that “a time will dawn when the worst of the people under the canopy of the sky will be the ulama.”

 Thus, the hundreds of molvis of Pakistan and of other places who justify digital pictography on the basis of Taqi’s absurdity, are all morons. Their stupid fatwas are rejected as effects of nafsaaniyat inspired by Iblees. Indeed they all are wrong. Even a layman who “seeks a fatwa from his heart” as commanded by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) understands the glaring incongruency, stupidity and satanism of this extremely absurd and ludicrous idea of a picture not being a picture if produced by means of the camera and video.

Secondly, if we did not come on media, the people who are going astray because of baatil people being on media will lose their Imaan. At least we are saving their imaan. Ok they are watching movies etc but in the least we are saving their imaan.

(Our comment: A person’s Imaan cannever be saved by means of haraam – by means of an institution which is mal-oon and on which is the Wrath of Allah Azza Wa Jal. Imaan is the product of Hidaayat of Allah Ta’ala. It is NEVER the effect of haraam, immorality and the obscenities which are displayed in deluges on these satanic media.

Far from people gaining hidaayat and their Imaan being saved by these haraam media, the stupid molvis appearing on these mal-oon haraam media lose their Imaan and resort to kufr justification of their haraam concepts designed to boost their ego. Their evil objective is nothing but the insane craving for name, fame and the haraam boodle which comes in the wake of these evils. Ignorant Muslims, fussaaq and fujjaar, who watch the youtube and facebook filth and pornography do not lose their Imaan because they are 100% convinced of the evil and sin of their own perpetration. They watch the filth and evil for nafsaani gratification. They are like people who commit fornication. They understand that they are sinning and they may gain taufeeq for Taubah.

But these rubbish molvis and maajin muftis who make halaal the evil which Allah Ta’ala has made haraam are deprived of taufeeq for making Taubah because they claim that their evil and sins are halaal.

Thirdly, you should at least accept that through media an alim’s voice is heard by millions. Then he gave example of a mufti who is khalifah of Hakeem Akhtar (Rahmatullah alayh). He said right now only a hundred people hear his voice. If he comes on media millions will listen to his voice. Wouldnt that be a great work of deen.

(Our comment: Since the fellow has introduced Hakeem Akhtar into this haraam picture, it may be salubrious for him to be informed of the comments of Hakim Akhtar Sahib regarding these satanic media such as TV, youtube, facebook, etc. In fact, he likened TV to faeces.

Hadhrat Maulana Akhtar Sahib (Rahmatullah alayh) had delivered a bayaan in a Musjid in Dubai. Some employees of Sharjah TV were also present at the bayaan. After the bayaan they commented that if Hadhrat Akhtar appeared on Sharjah TV, numerous people will come close to Allah Ta’ala and even embrace Islam. The khaadim conveyed this message and request of Sharjah TV to Hadhrat Akhtar. Hadhrat responded as follows:

“Ask them that if there is a spoon fitted with diamonds worth millions of rupees, and their aunt cleans the faeces of her child with this spoon, then cleans the spoon, then presents a dish of porridge to you to eat with this spoon, would you eat it?”

The Sharjah TV employees said: ‘No!’ Hadhrat Akhtar commented: “How can I appear on TV on which they teach adultery, shamelessness, obscenity, eloping from home, court marriages, obscene dances, shameless dresses, theft, alcoholism and addiction. We are the followers of such Akaabir who do not watch even Hajj or any religious programs on TV.

TV is a device of sin. It will destroy our children. Our Deen is not dependent on any media.”

(End of Hadhrat Hakeem Akhtar’s comments)

Always remember that the Objective is Ridha-Ilaahi (The Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala), not the pleasure of millions of people. Regardless of the millions of people who view pornography and indulge in zina of the eyes, mind and heart – zina in which these satanic media excel, the objective must not be lost. We are here on earth for a temporary sojourn to cultivate the Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala, and this is possible only by means of Taa-at (Obedience to Him). His Pleasure cannever be achieved by means of Haraam.

The corruption of the brains and hearts of these vile molvis and maajin muftis is self-evident from their inability to understand that indulgence in Haraam is not among the ways of the Sunnah for gaining the Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala. Such indulgence is a snare of Iblees who adorns his traps with zukhruful qawl – arguments and ideas presented in ‘deeni’ guise to destroy Imaan.

 So even if you believe that pictures are not allowed, you should not criticize those who believe it to be jaiz. You should appreciate that they are doing a lot of work of deen. Even if their ijtihad is wrong they will be rewarded. 

(Our comment: It is Waajib to criticize and lambast these mudhilleen whom Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) feared “more than Dajjaal”. They mislead the Ummah with their satanic ideas and stupid arguments. Shaitaan also does a lot of work. With their haraam they are aiding and abetting Iblees in his plot to scuttle the Shariah. How can they not be criticized when they claim that pork and faeces are halaal? We are not of the ilk of the Yahood who “took as gods their molvis and buzrugs”.

The ‘reward’ for halaalizing clear-cut haraam is Jahannam. Their ‘ijtihaad’ is shaitaani ijtihaad.

I then asked him about the hadith that ulama will be the worst of creatures under the sky and from them will emerge fitnahs and in them they will return. I asked him, surely we are living in those times. Can you tell me what those fitnahs are? If all the ulama are rightly guided and ma’joor (rewarded) by Allah because of their ijtihad, then what are those fitnahs? (The moron had no valid explanation since he is part of the fitan mentioned in the Hadith).

 I don’t understand how can the majority ulama of Pakistan, or of the world make something halaal when it’s haraam and then they use the hadith that my ummat will not unite on dalalah (deviation). Please explain.

(Our comment: Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) referred to the Ijma’ of the Ulama-e-Haqq, not to the absurdities of hufaalah (rubbish) who resort to glaring rendition of haraam into halaal. Furthermore, even in this era of fitnah, there are numerous Ulama who reject the claim of these molvis who have halaalized pictures. The moron ustaadh said ‘the ulama of Pakistan”. Did he undertake a survey? There are thousands or tens of thousands of molvis in Pakistan. Innumerable of these Ulama believe that pictures of all kinds are haraam. The molvi’s claim is bereft of valid basis. And, even if the majority is united on Haraam as it will be in the eras in close proximity to Qiyaamah as predicted by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Qur’aan Majeed states: “If you follow the majority, you will be misled.” In this dunya the majority always consists of the followers of Iblees. The majority is not a daleel of the Shariah. Any view which is in conflict with the Nusoos of the Shariah are rejected and mal-oon.

9 Zul Qa’dah 1444 – 30 May 2023





About the Book

Twisting the meaning of clear words of the true bibles has given a new shape to Christianity and has altogether changed it. These deliberate misinterpreted teachings of Moses and Christ prove that Christians and Jews have manipulated and thrusted quite different wordings and meanings into their scriptures according to their whims. They have attributed strange and funny things to the Prophets which neither appeal to human understanding nor are fit to the dignity of the personality of a true Prophet.

The Holy Quran contradicts and rejects all such wrong notions. It manifests and contains the true teachings of all Prophets. It clarifies the position and status of Jesus Christ also, his lifting up alive to heaven, and his reappearance alive on some day before the Day of Judgment.

According to Muslim belief, Jesus, son of truthful Maryam, is one of the Prophets of Allah. It strongly opposes and rejects the wrong Christian belief that Jesus Christ was “Son of God.”

In this book, Isabella, the learned author has made a successful attempt at clarifying the misleading ideas and teachings of Christianity. He has discussed various Christian beliefs, giving satisfying answers to the objections on Islam and the Holy Prophet. It is a useful treatise, in the form of a very interesting novel, on comparative study of Islam and Christianity.

Isabella, the main character of this book, is a seeker after truth. Her sincere attempt at acquiring knowledge to accept truth and justice leave everlasting effect upon the reader’s mind. A strict Christian girl, the daughter of a strict, orthodox and begotted Christian, the chief priest of Cordova, she ultimately discovers Islam to be the only soul-satisfying way of life. She lived for Islam and died for Islam.


The extraordinary respect and honour shown to him by Buzrugaan-e- Kiraam and Awliya-e-Izaam of every spiritual order in spite of his young age; by them approaching him as with a Buzrug without formal introduction to him; the outmost consideration accorded to him and without prior meeting reposing total confidence in him are ostensible proofs of him being respected, honoured, loved and accepted. But, in reality its nature was something else, from which the veil was removed by Hazrat Moulana Gangohi’s (Rahmatullahi alaih) Khaleefa-e-Mujaaz, the emotional and ecstatic Buzrug, Hazrat Moulana Muhammad Roshan Khan Saheb (Rahmatullahi alaih).
This was when Hazrat Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi went to visit the said Buzrug at a time when he was preparing for his journey to the Aakhirat. After explaining his illness, unexpectedly he requested du’aa from Hazrat Thanwi emotionally and with tears in his eyes. He said: “Well! This is the state of my illness. Now you make du’aa for me that Allah Ta’ala makes my ending with Imaan. Allah Ta’ala has made you the Mujaddid of this century. May Allah Ta’ala cast light to this world through your faiz and barakaat and at your hands may He uproot customs and bid’aat.”

Qurbaani 1444


ZIL HAJJ 1444          JUNE 2023

THE QUR’BAANI SEASON is drawing near. Along with the execution of the obligation of Qur’baani, the needs of the poor can also be served by doing the Qur’baani in villages in which the inhabitants are extremely poor and unable to afford the luxury of meat most of the year.

We shall appreciate it very much if those who will be participating in the Qur’baani Project will send in their order and payment early. Although we shall be taking Qur’baani orders right until the Day of Eidul Adhaa (10th Zil Hijjah), early ordering and payment will make our task easy.

Full Cow R6,000 (R860 1 share)Full Cow US$420 (US$60 1 share)


Download full pamphlet



The following is the response of a Student of Deen responding to the view of a bogus ‘mufassir’ pertaining to beating wives:

Someone recently sent me a clip of Nouman Ali Khan – a popular “Mufassir” and Arabic teacher. In the clip, he relates a Hadith saying, “Do not hit the female slaves of Allah”, and proceeds to emphasise how hitting is “abuse” and completely forbidden.

I have attached the audio with this email.

I checked for the narration he is citing and found that he had committed blatant deception by omitting the rest of the narration. In summary, he omits the following crucially relevant parts of the particular narration he is citing:

1) After Rasulullah ﷺ initially forbade hitting, the women went out of control. They became emboldened and started behaving badly with their husbands

2) When Umar (radiyallahu anhu) complained of this to Rasulullah ﷺ, he gave permission to the Sahabah (radiyallahu anhum) to hit their wives by saying “Hit them”.

3) After the Sahabah (radhiyallahu anhum) then dealt with their wives’ misbehaviour by hitting them, many of the women went to complain to Rasulullah ﷺ

4) Rasulullah ﷺ did not then reinstate the prohibition. He only encouraged them not to, by saying that those who hit are not the best.

Furthermore, he omits to mention that the permission is upheld by numerous other authentic Hadith and, most importantly and undeniably, the verse of the Qur’an.

 (End of the Student’s Response)


The purpose of this rebuttal of the baseless view of the bogus ‘mufassir’ is not to encourage beating women, especially in this era when marriages are regarded as some sport to be broken and ruined on the basis of flimsy and haraam pretexts.

The need for refuting the bogus ‘mufassir’ is to assert the Truth by rejecting the falsehood which the crank propagates to appease modern women who are contaminated with lesbian tendencies.

While it is undeniable that it is not permissible to beat wives for gratifying one’s anger and the nafs, just as it is not permissible to beat children for such nafsaani reasons, the Qur’aanic fact is that it is permissible to beat them lightly when there is valid reason. Anyone who denies this Qur’aanic command loses his Imaan.

Allah Ta’ala states in the Qur’aan Majeed:

“Men are the rulers over women……….Regarding those women whose disobedience you fear, advise them (give them naseehat),  separate then from (your) beds, and beat them. Then if they obey you, do not then commit excess on them. Verily, Allah is Most High, The Greatest.” (An-Nisaa’, Aayat 34)

The ‘beating’ permitted by the Qur’aan is explained in the Hadith as light beating and as a last resort. No one encourages beating wives. But to deny the validity of this Qur’aanic command is KUFR –kufr which expels one from the fold of Islam.

4 Zul Qa’dah 1444 – 25 May 2023




In the vein of Amr  Bil Ma’roof Nahyi Anil Munkar, a U.K. Student  of  the Deen offers  the following  naseehat:

Nowadays in UK job interviewers are beginning to ask: “What are your views on having to work with a gay colleague?” Muslims think they are being astute by saying that what people do in their private lives has no effect on how they would deal with such a person in the work environment.

Far from being astute, this is implicit acceptance of LGBTQ & evidence of the lack of abhorrence for the sin of homosexual acts. The reason is if a Muslim recites Qur’an and reads Ahadith on the actions of the people of qawm-e-Lut, it is apparent that the severity and categorical condemnation of these acts is such that it leaves a Muslim absolutely no grounds to manoeuvre or squirm.

It is also implicit rejection of the Hadith that when evil deeds predominate in a society, regardless of them being in private, Allah’s anger and punishment descends. So how can it be the case that what people do in their private lives is of no concern to us? As vicegerents of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam on this earth we command the good and forbid the evil? How then is it astute or intellectual to then say that what sins people commit privately and then promote openly as normal and equal is of no concern to us?

As university graduates, Muslims have been indoctrinated in the satanic art of zukhruf al-qawl and they think they are being smart with answers on topics such as LGBTQ. We can deceive the people as to how intellectual we are with our word play, but Allah Ta’ala knows that it is the weakness of Imaan in our hearts which has compelled us to answer in a wishy washy manner.

Further, by answering in a roundabout manner in the first place, this opens a can of worms, which eventually leads to questions: “Do you believe gays have equal rights?” Or, “Do you believe that gay marriage is equal to heterosexual marriage?” The Qur’an warns us that they will never be happy until we reject our Deen, meaning one compromising answer will necessitate more compromising stances.

And there is no better evidence of this than the Scottish MP Hamza Yousaf recently who made statements of kufr publicly on the issue of LGBTQ after being pushed by a kafirah interviewer to clarify his stance on gay marriage. “Muslims” then tried to support him saying ikrah (compulsion) was involved without even knowing the Shar’i threshold for compulsion. Then there is the case of “Mufti” Menk who became discombobulated on the issue of homosexuality because his first answer on this issue was to appease the kafirah interviewer. By the end of his answer, he had performed such mental and verbal gymnastics, he had either become a gymnast, kafir or homosexual himself.

If western secularist atheists unashamedly promote immorality, a Muslim should not be ashamed to politely yet categorically outline the haq from the outset, which in the setting of a job interview is a simple statement: “My religion forbids homosexuality, the promotion of it and regarding those who act on it as equals.” This nips the issue in the bud. Nobody can ask you anything further after you have made your stance clear.

To hell with the subsequent labels. Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam was labelled far worse by his opponents such that Allah revealed the verses in Surah Al-Qalam taking qasam: “By the pen and what everyone writes! By the grace of your Rabb, you (O Prophet) are not insane. You will certainly have a never ending reward. And you are truly of outstanding character.”

Being labelled a homophobe is a very small emulation of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam, for which we should be proud, and InshaAllah we too will have a never ending reward. In the hereafter we will see “Bi ayyikumul maftoon,” i.e. who is really mad? Whenever a person encounters any consternation or difficulty from the kuffar for proclaiming the haq, they should immediately resort to the Seerah of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam and the Sahabah. This will bring comfort to his soul. Allah Ta’ala says in Qur’an: “And each (story) we relate to you from the news of the messengers is that by which We make your heart firm.” This is the way to obtain steadfastness on such subjects.

I could write much more, but this shall suffice. In conclusion, a Muslim should not even set one foot on the path of compromising their stance with these so-called astute answers. Because once a Muslim puts one foot on that path, they will end up treading that path. No job is worth potential compromise of Imaan. A Muslim should have Tawakkul in Allah & know that his rizq is preordained. Not a grain more or less will reach a person than what Allah Ta’ala has decreed. And his death shall not occur until he has received his full allocation.

4 Zul Qa’dah 1444 – 25 May 2023