The world has gone absolutely crazy…
The New York Post reports:
A gay, polyamorous California throuple made history in 2017 when they became the first family in the state to list three dads on a birth certificate.
Their reproductive journey and legal battle to become fathers to Piper, now 3, is detailed in “Three Dads and a Baby” (out March 9, Cleis Press), written by one of her dads, Dr. Ian Jenkins.
Jenkins and his partners, Jeremy Hodges and Dr. Alan Mayfield, don’t see their family — which now also includes their son, Parker, 1 — as unusual.
It is very interesting to note that the only forms of family that are fiercely opposed by the West are nuclear marriage and polygyny. It truly is decency that they are at war with, above any “human rights infractions” or patriarchy.
These extremists permit the existence of almost any kind of union, regardless of number, type, species, etc., as long as it is in the name of love. For them, everybody who opposes any such union is actually against love. Children and the society at large may suffer because of these degenerates but that’s not a problem at all, as long as we’re out here defending “love.”
How convenient it is that an abstract word such as “love” is employed towards trying to make all kinds of degenerate filth not only tolerable but also things to be “celebrated.”
I find it quite ironic how they call for love when their very own hearts have become so hardened that are simply incapable of comprehending or manifesting “love” in its truest and fullest meaning. What they feel is probably closer to affection, infatuation, lust or dependency, rather than love with a capital L.
In any case, such people cannot fathom what true love ultimately is.
The truest love that anyone can have is their love for Allah.
RELATED: The Believer’s Love for Allah
To make the matter even more confusing, how do they explain why two women that both wish to marry the same man, say out of their love for him, aren’t both allowed to marry him in the West? Isn’t this the worst kind of enmity against love? If one man is the “true love” of more than one woman, why can’t they both be afforded the opportunity to marry him and live happily ever after? Just consider all the women who are in love with a man that is already married but are by law unable to marry him.
The liberal world is clearly oppressing these poor women by depriving them of their fundamental “right” to marry the one they love.
At this point, they are left with two options:
- either they accept that this logic is sound and therefore they must rise up in protest and pressure their governments into legalizing polygyny; or
- they reject their own slogans of “love is love,” etc.
This is a simple dilemma that they cannot solve.
The first option would oppose contemporary feminist sensibilities, and as we know all too well, they are absolutely terrified of offending women.
The second option would force them to reconsider the entire LGBTQ+ movement, along with the marital law reforms of the past decade.
Unfortunately though, no amount of clear, evidence-based argumentation will be sufficient to change their minds. They aren’t, and they never have been, rational or consistent to begin with. As long as the Muslims remain weak—and add to the equation all the feminism-peddling, liberalism-enabling, “compassionate,” simp Imams—their evil and unjust laws will prevail.
In the meantime however, polygynous households are forced to hide their love under the oppression of liberalism. They must they live in constant fear of being discovered and persecuted for their love; and the horror of being torn away from their beloved.