Does a female have to conceal her name? Is it against modesty for a female to mention her name. Can a female reveal her name on twitter? A mufti says that it is permissible for a woman to publish her name. In support of his contention, the mufti says:
“Hence, the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) would mention the names of his noble wives and daughters in public, and he addressed and referred to many females by name.”
The mufti also supports his view with narrations of the Sahaabah and other Ulama. He also says that most scholars mention the name of the bride in the Masjid and in many cemeteries the name of the female is written on the grave. He has similar other arguments to support his view of a female exposing and publishing her name. Please comment?
The arguments of this mufti are moronic and expose his shallowness of understanding. The arguments he proffered have no relationship with the question which pertains to a female revealing her name on brothel-media. ‘Social’ media is pure shaitaaniyat. It is the primary propagator of fisq, fujoor and kufr in this era. It is filth – najaasat and haraam.
The question pertains to a female herself revealing her name on devil media thereby exposing herself to all and sundry – to fussaaq, fujjaar and kuffaar – to scoundrels of the worst kind. These media excel in pornography and in every satanic art of immorality and vice. Furthermore, the mention of the names of females by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Sahaabah and other Ulama was NEVER the case of women revealing their names to a public drunk with carnal lust. The noble Wives of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) did not publish their names. They did not advertise themselves as do these shameless, immoral women who advertise themselves on devil’s media. The women whose names were mentioned did not expose themselves. They did not reveal their names. Others mentioned their names.
The moronity, stupidity and puerility of the mufti is quite conspicuous with his stupid ‘daleel’ of women’s names appearing on boards in graveyards. This is no Shar’i daleel. It is plain stupidity. Furthermore, the dead woman buried underground has decomposed into dust. The issue of exposure may not be applied to her. She is not exposed by her name being revealed. Also, the deceased woman did not expose or reveal her name. Others did it, and there is no Shar’i validity and no real need for even mentioning her name on a graveyard board.
As for the bride’s name being mentioned during the Nikah ceremony at the Musjid, this is based on need. The Shariah emphasises the publication of marriages. Furthermore, it is not the woman who is revealing her name. Others mention the name of the bride. There is no link between others mentioning the names of females for whatever good reason they have, and a woman herself advertising her name like a prostitute on media which excel in pornography and prostitution.
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Woman is Aurah.” This applies to the whole of the woman, including her name. It is not permissible for a woman herself to reveal her name to a rotten public on media which are more rotten, filthy and immoral. A woman who advertises herself on these devil’s media is heavily sedated with the tendencies of prostitutes. She is utterly shameless, and more shameless than her is the moron mufti who halaalizes such haraam exposure.
The mufti says: “There is no reason for it to be concealed. No boy will develop an interest or get any feelings for a girl just due to her name.” It is not permissible for a chap so ignorant to issue fatwa. It is not a mere issue of a name of a female. The advertisement of the name comes with other paraphernalia which open the avenue for zina. Females advertising themselves, especially on these immoral, haraam media are prostitutes at heart. The moron mufti has soothed their immoral consciences with his zigzag stupid fatwa.
There is abundant reason for a woman NOT to reveal her name in public. The imperative need is for her to conceal her name. Just what is her motive for self-advertisement? The stupidity of the mufti is colossal. Every act is motivated. Why would a woman advertise herself on immoral, porno facebook and the like? One need not be a repository of baseerat and any erudition to understand the underlying motive of a female who advertises herself. Iblees operates cunningly by degrees. He lures and entangles with such issues which moron, maajin muftis proclaim ‘permissible’, but which in reality ignite the conflagration of sin and vice.
Stupidly and baselessly does the jaahil attempt to justify his haraam fatwa with the name of Hadhrat Faatimah (Radhiyallahu anha). O Jaahil! When did Hadhrat Faatimah (Radhiyallahu anha) ever advertise or publicize or reveal her name. She was the Queen of Jannat who had introduced the Sunnah of FIVE shrouds for the dead body of a female. She was the one who had instructed that people should not be informed of her death, and that she be buried secretly. Only a man whose brains are operating in disequilibrium has the temerity and the stupidity to justify the acts of lewd facebook women with the Name of Hadhrat Faatimah (Radhiyallahu anha).
The jaahil says that in Muatta Imaam Maalik at least 74 names of females are mentioned. Not a single one of these noble females had ever revealed their names. There is utterly no basis for the haraam fatwa of the jaahil mufti in the names of the females in Muatta.
The mufti maajin has not been able to mention one Muslim female – one among the illustrious Ladies of Islam who had advertised or revealed or exposed her name. He has merely disgorged the drivel of some Ulama having mentioned the names of some noble ladies. But this is never a daleel for justifying the exposure which prostitutes are giving to their names on these porno sites and media.