THE KUFR OF “WOMEN-LED WEDDINGS”

QUESTION

What is the Shariah’s view regarding “women’s-led weddings”? Is it permissible for a woman to officiate at a Muslim Nikah ceremony? She also recites the Nikah khutbah and conducts the ceremony in the same way as an Imaam does? Please comment in detail on this new development.

ANSWER AND COMMENT

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“Never ever will prosper the affair of people who entrust their affair to a woman.”

“Relegate them (women) to the background as Allah has relegated them into the background.”

When it is haraam for a woman to recite audibly even the Qiraa’t during Salaat even in privacy, by what stretch on intelligent logic and Shar’i comprehension will it ever be permissible for her to recite audibly a nikah khutbah and have it broadcast for all the kuffaar, fussaaq and fujjaar of the world to hear? When it is haraam for her to recite even the Talbiyah audibly, how can it ever be halaal for her to recite a khutbah audibly for an audience consisting of a variety of devils?

The issue of a stupid woman stupidly ‘officiating’ at a Nikah ceremony is not of technical or academic concern. It is related to the practical domain of the Shariah – to the Sunnah of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Salafus Saaliheen. It is an issue which has to be viewed in the light of the Sunnah practice of the Ummah – the Practice inherited from the Sahaabah (Radhiyallahu anhum) who were the first and the chief proponents and exponents of the Sunnah. And, obedience to the Sunnah is Waajib by the Command of Allah Azza Wa Jal repeatedly mentioned in the Qur’aan Majeed: “Obey (and follow) Allah and His Rasool.” This is the recurring theme which permeates the entire Qur’aan Majeed.

Any practice which is in conflict or in negation with the standard Sunnah is a satanic act stemming from the emporium of Kufr operated by the zanaadqah and the munaafiqeen who masquerade as Muslims. While these munaafiq modernists set themselves up as exponents of the Shariah, and proponents of the Deen, they are bankrupt in every equipage necessary for the validity of even Imaan.

Every Muslim with even the intelligence of a chicken can readily comprehend that a Nikah conducted by a woman is in diametric conflict with the Sunnah and as such stands condemned and haraam in the Eyes of the Shariah. There is absolutely no scope for this kufr accretion in Islam. Never was there such a kufr practice in Islam from its very inception. Did the greatest female Aalimah, Hadhrat Aishah (Radhiyallahu anha) ever encroach on this issue which belongs exclusively to the male domain?

This new, stupid, kuffaar-emulated practice has no relationship with Islam. It is a haraam innovation. This type of ‘wedding’ is not permissible. A couple who has suffered the satanic calamity and misfortune of having been duped into this shaitaani bid’ah should have a proper Shar’i Nikah performed.

Only women who are lesbians or confirmed prostitutes can possess the shaitaani temerity of ‘officiating’ a nikah ceremony. This office is designed divinely exclusively for males. A nikah at which a lesbian-type woman officiates is Mal-oon (Accursed).

QUESTION

Also comment on a ‘recent trend’ of women preferring to represent themselves at their wedding ceremonies instead of being represented by their Walis (Male Representatives, e.g. father, brother, etc.). Is this trend permissible?

ANSWER

This is another haraam trend. Firstly, even technically and in terms of Islamic Legality, such a marriage is not valid according to THREE of the four official Math-habs of the Sunnah, viz., Maaliki, Shaafi and Hambali. Although in terms of the Hanafi Math-hab, there is slight leeway for legal validity, it is HARAAM for a woman to bypass her male Wali and arrange for her own nikah. Thus, there is Ijma’ (Consensus) of all Math-habs, and of even deviate groups such as the Salafis, that such a nikah is HARAAM.

Again, only women whose modesty has been rent apart, who in all probability are no longer virgin due to fornication, who will have such satanic brazenness to arrange for their own marriages – to represent themselves in 100% denial of the Law of the Wali ordained by Allah Azza Wa Jal.

These lewd women are just like the Carrion Cartel such as SANHA and MJC who maintain that their certified carrion chickens and carrion meat are ‘halaal’ despite their entire killing system, packing system and mock supervisory system being haraam from A to Z. Despite the entire system being 100% In conflict with the Shariah and emphatically Haraam, these vile carrion purveyors dupe the public into the capital LIE that their meat and chicken products are ‘halaal’. In like manner are these immoral women and their Munaafiq male handlers who goad them on to perpetrate haraam and ruin their morality, their Imaan and their Aakhirat. Despite their shaitaani perpetrations being brazenly and flagrantly HARAAM, they seek legal mirages to cloak their haraam acts with a vestige of permissibility.

QUESTION

A modernist says that although Islam requires spouses to marry with a contract, this is neglected in the Muslim community. Is this claim Islamically valid?

ANSWER

The claim is a satanic invalidity. The chap who ventured this stupidity is undoubtedly a zindeeq, a munaafiq and a murtad. Islam does not require what the zindeeq moron alleges. While a contract is permissible, it is not a requisite of the Nikah nor is it a Sunnah practice. It is an isolated act which never was encouraged by the Sunnah.

The claimant is most probably a supporter of the lesbian women’s lib. movement, hence he has made this preposterous claim. The Islamic practice of more than fourteen centuries rejects this stupid notion of the lesbians and the zindeeq male handlers of these immodest women who are in entirety lacking in haya (shame and modesty) about which Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Haya is a branch of Imaan.”

These lesbian-orientated semi-women are so shameless that they advertise their zina relationship on the internet for all and sundry to see and know. They are not Muslims. They are such kuffaar who are worse than even Iblees himself, and their male handlers are even worse.

CONCLUSION

Epistasis and infusoria of this filthy, kufr type will be on the increase. Lewdness and immorality are integral to the introductory stage of Qiyaamah. According to the Hadith such satanically immoral specimens of humanity will still be literally transfigured into apes and pigs. The first stage of this process is the transformation of the hearts and brains. The hearts and brains of these immoral epistasis specimens of the human race have already been figuratively transformed into the brains and hearts of pigs and apes. The literal or physical transformation and disfigurement are yet to occur on the doorstep of Qiyaamah.

17 Zul-Qa’dh 1442 – 28 June 2021