SHAITAANI GAPS AND MASKS INVALIDATE IMAAN
The satanism called ‘social distancing’ and the masks invalidate not only Salaat. This shaitaaniyat invalidates the Imaan of those who deliberately introduce it in the Musaajid. The innovaters of this shaitaaniyat, in addition to destroying their own Imaan, involve the ignorant ones in haraam acts.
Why does this shaitaaniyat invalidate Imaan?
(1) The Saff (Salaat row)
Those who have initiated these practices are atheists, kuffaar and mushrikeen.
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) commanded: “Stand shoulder to shoulder!” The atheists command: “Don’t stand shoulder to shoulder. Stand wide apart.” In obedience to the atheists, the molvi/imam or committee of the Musjid gives preference to the instruction of the atheists.
The instruction of the atheists is adopted on the basis of it being valid and correct while the command of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is denied and rejected on the basis of it being flawed and being a threat to life and health. This is glaring KUFR.
The articles and statements issued by the likes of Bogus uucsa, Bogus jusa, Jaahil mjc and others of this kufr-nifaaq hue, have made it abundantly clear that these vermin believe that standing shoulder to shoulder is a danger to health and life. It spreads the disease.
For a detailed explanation of the shaitaaniyat of ‘social distancing’, read our booklet: “TARAAS-SOO!” – HARAAM SATANIC SAFF FORMATION, SOCIAL DISTANCING
Insha-Allah, a further treatise on this subject shall be published.
The atheists advise and instruct wearing masks. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) prohibited wearing masks in Salaat. Again, preference is given to an innovation of the atheists on the basis of the belief that performing Salaat without masks constitutes a danger to health and life.
This preference for the act of the atheists and rejection of the prohibition of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) intentionally and deliberately is KUFR.
Those in charge of Musaajid, who profess to be Muslims, are enforcing these artefacts of KUFR because they believe that the theories of the atheists are correct, and that the methods of Salaat (i.e. saff-formation and prohibition of masks) are baseless and a danger to health and life. Their attitude and belief have eliminated their Imaan. They are no longer Muslims. Salaat behind such renegades is not valid.
Duress, Arrest, Compulsion, Majboori, etc.
This is a bogey of the Munaafiqeen who enforce the shaitaani kufr regulations on ignorant musallis. The argument that the government is enforcing the wide gaps thereby allowing the shayaateen to occupy the vacant spaces, is baseless and false. Non-observance of the shaitaaniyat of ‘social distancing’ is not a criminal offence.
Social distancing, Spacing, Masks and Sanitizers
In a letter issued by the South African Police Services to the entire police hierarchy of the country, some of the salient statements are:
(5) “Complaints of torture, excessive use of force, inhumane treatment and punishment of the community by enforcement officers (including members of the SAPS) during the State of Disaster have come to the attention of the National Commissioner. Conduct of this nature by members of the SAPS is unacceptable and will be dealt with in terms of the criminal law and the disciplinary process of the SAPS.”
(6.2.1) “A member may under no circumstances arrest a person in order to punish, scare or harass such a person or to teach him or her a lesson.”
(6.2.3) “Members must ensure that a particular offence exists in law before arresting a person for the commission of an offence. Where certain conduct has not been criminalized (such as the wearing of masks or social distancing)
members must sensitize “transgressors” that their conduct is endangering their health and that of others.”
(6.2.7) “A member who uses force for any other purpose (such as to punish or teach the suspect a lesson), may himself or herself be guilty of an offence, such as assault, assault GBH, attempted murder, etc.”
(6.2.14) “Members may not use private equipment or equipment not issued by SAPS such as a “sjambok”, etc.”
In Guidelines regarding social distancing, the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans, and also the Minister of Police state:
“Social distancing is currently not an offence, therefore, it cannot be enforced. However, Enforcement Officers may encourage and sensitize members of the public to adhere to social distancing.”
The Deputy Provincial Commissioner: South African Police Service Limpopo Province, in a directive to the entire South African Police Service, states:
“1.1. It has come to the attention of this office that members of the public are arrested for not wearing a cloth or other mask. It has further come to the attention that drivers of public transport vehicles are arrested for allowing passengers more than 70% of the maximum loading capacity of the vehicle.
1.1 There are a number of regulations of which the contravention thereof are not criminal offences. ………….. The following are examples of regulations of which the failure to comply, is not a criminal offence.
220.127.116.11. Although the regulations specifically provide that every person must wear a mask, the failure to do so is not an offence and no person may be arrested for the contravention thereof.
Regarding sanitizers, the Deputy Provincial Commissioner states:
“18.104.22.168 The failure to comply with these sub regulations is not an offence and no person may be arrested for such failure.
22.214.171.124 The failure to comply with any of the above-mentioned directives is not an offence and no person may be arrested for such failure.
5.2 The arrest of persons for the contravention of the regulations and directives mentioned above is not allowed and will be taken in a serious light. In case of a civil claim against the SA Police Service, members may be held liable for any loss incurred by the state.”
Among the regulations for which arrests may not be made for non-compliance is the use of sanitizers which the Munaafiq committees of some Musaajid are enforcing. These committees surpass the government and the police in the shaitaaniyat of enforcement of kufr demands.
“126.96.36.199 The regulations provides that the person in control of retail stores or institutions must:
a) Provide hand sanitizers for use by the public at the entrance of the business ………..The failure of a business owner to comply with the sub regulation is not an offence and no person may be arrested for such failure.”
If a gathering is unlawful in terms of the oppressive and draconian measures of the government, e.g. instead of 50 there are 100 persons present, then the law states:
“An enforcement officer must, where a prohibited gathering takes place —
(a) Order the persons at the gathering to disperse immediately; and
(b) If the persons refuse to disperse, take appropriate action, which may, subject to the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No.51 of 1977), include the arrest and detention of any person at the gathering.”
(Government Gazette – 28 May 2020)
Thus, the police may not summarily arrest. An arrest without first ordering dispersal is unlawful.
Non-observance of shaitaani gaps (social distancing) is not a criminal offence.
Not wearing a haraam mask is not a criminal offence.
Not using the haraam sanitizer is not a criminal offence
If the gathering exceeds 50, arrests are unlawful prior to ordering dispersal.
There is no compulsion, no dhuroorah and no majjboori to compel compliance with the host of haraam-kufr conditions which the munaafiqeen have introduced at the Musaajid. All these shaitaani conditions have been accepted and adopted in flagrant rejection of the commands of Allah Ta’ala, hence the KUFR is glaring and flagrant. As such Imaan is invalidated.
The KUFR is of an aggravated nature in view of the fact that the Munaafiq enforcers believe that these conditions advised by the atheists are correct and their observance is imperative whereas the explicit Nusoos of the Shariah debunking the ideology of the atheists is erroneous and practical expression thereof spreads the disease, harms the health and kills.
Those who claim that salaat performed in this evil state is valid are in grievous error. They are either munaafiqs or ignorant or short-sighted or plain stupid.
“Who is a greater zaalim (oppressor) than the one who prevents the Thikr of Allah in the Musaajid (and added to this villainy) he strives in the destruction of the Musaajid?” (Al-Baqarah, Aayat 114)
15 Shawwaal 1441 – 8 June 2020